• 0

Post 3DMARK03 scores


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

870 is my score and I expected better! Shoot! Was thinking of getting an engagement ring this summer. After these scores, looks like a Radeon9700 is my future! :laugh: Just kidding! But seriously, I did expect better. Thought maybe I'd crack at least 1000. Oh well.

AthlonXP 2000+

Radeon8500DV AIW 64MB

SB Audigy MP3

MSI KT333 Ultra-2 Mobo

640MB DDR

  • 0
870 is my score and I expected better!  Shoot!  Was thinking of getting an engagement ring this summer.  After these scores, looks like a Radeon9700 is my future! :laugh:  Just kidding!  But seriously, I did expect better.  Thought maybe I'd crack at least 1000.  Oh well.

AthlonXP 2000+

Radeon8500DV AIW 64MB

SB Audigy MP3

MSI KT333 Ultra-2 Mobo

640MB DDR

how in the world did you get this to work.

I have a AthlonXP 2200+

Radeon 8500 AIW 128 mb

SB Live!

Soyo Dragon Ultra platinum

512 MB RAM

when i run it i get 5 warnings prior to getting the main window. it says none of the tests are supported and will not run the demo.

i know i have direct x 9 and 3dmark 2002 worked. what's up with this?

  • 0

1479 3DMarks

Athlon XP 2100+

1GB DDR 2700

VisionTek GeForce ti4600

Windows XP

I understand the whole DX9 issue and why Nvidia cards score lower than the ATI 9700s, but I'm still seeing a lot of people with slower CPUs, less RAM and older GeForce cards beat my score. Thought it might be because I'm running a dual display, but disabled that, and the score remained the same.

  • 0

well i knew it would be bad anyway but i had to try it ....

score 128 !

:(

i have being wanting to upgrade for ages but i am waiting for the new AMD and ATI chips

Spec

AMD 800

512 133 SDRAM

Geforce 2 GTS

looking though the post .. it seems that i didnt do too bad concidering my spec :huh:

  • 0
well i knew it would be bad anyway but i had to try it ....

score 128 !

:(

i have being wanting to upgrade for ages but i am waiting for the new AMD and ATI chips

Spec

AMD 800

512 133 SDRAM

Geforce 2 GTS

looking though the post .. it seems that i didnt do too bad considering my spec :huh:

how did you even get it to run

aren't the minimum specs

1ghz cpu?

  • 0
3612

ati 9700 pro / with catalyst 3.1 drivers

p4 2.53 @ 2.85

512 megs of ddr333

asus p4pe motherboard

2 80 gig wd special edition hard drives

lian-li pc6083a case

antec 430 power

audigy 2

yamaha f1 44x burner

pioneer 16x slot load

hmm... your score seems to be a little low ... i got almost the same hardware that you got and i benchmarked 4625.... so you migh wanna check your pc for problems...

  • 0
Posted on Feb 12 2003, 04:43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P4 2.26Ghz

512DDR

64MB GeForce Ti4200

Score: 850..... WTF?

haha, well thats 3dMark for ya.

why do u guys care so much, its ONLY a benchmark, what really matters is how games play. Don't upgrade just to get a higher 3dmark score thats just stupid.

I know, I don't really care about it, only about the games I actually play :) like Q3 which I play at 1600x1200 :) usally get 150-200 fps

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!