• 0

Post 3DMARK03 scores


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
3612

ati 9700 pro / with catalyst 3.1 drivers

p4 2.53 @ 2.85

512 megs of ddr333

asus p4pe motherboard

2 80 gig wd special edition hard drives

lian-li pc6083a case

antec 430 power

audigy 2

yamaha f1 44x burner

pioneer 16x slot load

hmm... your score seems to be a little low ... i got almost the same hardware that you got and i benchmarked 4625.... so you migh wanna check your pc for problems...

where would you suggest to look.

everything ( as far as i know ) is fine.

games play great, full detail with no problems.

things did seem pretty choppy though during the 3dmark2003 benchmarks.

i adjusted the settings for my vid card to be set at optimal performance and turned off things like vertical sync and trueform.

any suggestions ?

i thought my score seemed a little low. :blush:

  • 0

Well i read somewhere probably on Neowin that 3DMark03 is geared towards shader performance and directX 9 stuff and all that so the GF4 series wont be up to the challenge as well as a GeForce FX card would be. Dont be bothered about benchmarks they dont really show real world performance and thats all that matters.

You want to spend ?1000's just so you can get a higher benchmark score i have one thing that you should ask yourself "Do i have a life?"

  • 0

Every time I've executed 3D Mark (now and in the past), it's never NOT depressed me about my current hardware setup.

I got 1081 marks. :wacko:

Then again, my processor is nearing 2 years old :) And I'm not looking to upgrade. This app is just what computer makers LOVE.

  • 0
poor Photoshop skills... try getting the text the right size.

hahahahaha dazzla has poor photoshop skills? if he photoshops something and doesn't want you to know it, you won't. plain and simple.

anyways thanks..i was needing that laugh today.

  • 0
Scored a mere 4512 points : http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=17512

:laugh:

?! How the hell? I have a faster CPU than you and I even oc'ed my 9700 Pro to 350/680 and you have double of my score...?

I did notice that our BIOS version for 9700 is different... can that have anything to do with it... mmm

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=21331

  • 0
1479 3DMarks

Athlon XP 2100+

1GB DDR 2700

VisionTek GeForce ti4600

Windows XP

I understand the whole DX9 issue and why Nvidia cards score lower than the ATI 9700s, but I'm still seeing a lot of people with slower CPUs, less RAM and older GeForce cards beat my score. Thought it might be because I'm running a dual display, but disabled that, and the score remained the same.

mine gets 1487 3DMarks

and i have a 1.5ghz p4, 640mb RDRAM, and a GeForce4 Ti4200

i will give a compare link when the site actually works...i tried to send it but it says their server is down...

  • 0
1479 3DMarks

Athlon XP 2100+

1GB DDR 2700

VisionTek GeForce ti4600

Windows XP

I understand the whole DX9 issue and why Nvidia cards score lower than the ATI 9700s, but I'm still seeing a lot of people with slower CPUs, less RAM and older GeForce cards beat my score. Thought it might be because I'm running a dual display, but disabled that, and the score remained the same.

mine gets 1487 3DMarks

and i have a 1.5ghz p4, 640mb RDRAM, and a GeForce4 Ti4200

i will give a compare link when the site actually works...i tried to send it but it says their server is down...

Yeah, I couldn't submit my results. Perhaps that's what I need to do to show grafXguru how 1337 I am with my "fake, photoshopped" score...

9000+ = instant e-penis...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!