Not sure which iPod I want...


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

I am looking at buying a new iPod within the next 2-4 weeks but I'm not sure which model I want to purchase. I have a music library with 12 GB of music currently, however I don't see myself needing to keep my entire library on the iPod, just some songs for when I am out for a few hours jogging or mountain biking for example, I am not planning on really playing videos or games with it.

Currently I am considering either the iPod nano (8 GB), iPod classic (80 GB), or possibly iPod touch (8 GB). I know that the iPod classic has a small form factor hard disk drive inside of it so I'm not sure if it would be the best choice for an active lifestyle, however if anyone can correct me on this please feel free to do so.

I have heard great things about the Apple Refurbished Store, and have seen one success so far -- I purchased an iPod nano (previous generation, the ones that look like an Apple remote) for my girlfriend and it looks like it's brand new, so it is definitely an option I will be considering with this purchase as well. My budget is $350.

Thank you all in advance for your time and help in this matter.

Edited by Cadium
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/644385-not-sure-which-ipod-i-want/
Share on other sites

yeah, I'd say the nano 8GB, I'm my experience I have a very small library so the nano is perfect for me...but seeing how you have more than 8GB, I guess you'd have to ask yourself, at what rate does your library grow? will it consume 8GB in a small time, if so then the 80GB since it may seem better in the long run.

the touch has the perfect capacity but seems too delicate for what you'll use it for.

yeah, I'd say the nano 8GB, I'm my experience I have a very small library so the nano is perfect for me...but seeing how you have more than 8GB, I guess you'd have to ask yourself, at what rate does your library grow? will it consume 8GB is a small time, if so then the 80GB since it may seem better in the long run.

the touch has the perfect capacity but seems too delicate for what you'll use it for.

As far as library growth, I usually only add a few songs here and there each month, however I have a lot of music that I do not like any more (my library reduction will be targeted towards my death metal and electronica that I really can't stand), so it should make up for it and give the library some lee-way.

As far as library growth, I usually only add a few songs here and there each month, however I have a lot of music that I do not like any more (my library reduction will be targeted towards my death metal and electronica that I really can't stand), so it should make up for it and give the library some lee-way.

well then, the nano seems to be a perfect fit for you.

Nothing, it's just designed to do more than play music and video. The other iPods are tailored for music, but the iPod Touch runs a version of OS X, has lots of applications and has other things in it such as Wi-Fi.

It might be too much, but it is not delicate.

I've slammed mine in car doors, and when I ride the bus I will intentionally knock it against the wall in time with music. I know it's tough, so I don't treat it carefully.. if you know what I mean.

The only reason I went for the touch is because I don't like the click wheel. That's basically my reason.

If you're familiar with the wheel and like it, get the Nano.

The only reason I went for the touch is because I don't like the click wheel. That's basically my reason.

That's one of the reasons I bought an iPod touch (32 gig). Plus, I just got tired of the same old iPod. I wanted something new and different, not just the same thing with a bigger hard drive and new looks.

I've had an iPod touch before and it broke due to an accident, I'm not sure if another iPod touch would be beneficial to me as the area I live in does not have a lot of Wi-Fi hot spots so internet connectivity would be limited, although now that I have a .Mac subscription (soon to be MobileMe) it may be a bit more useful but I still don't know... [sigh].

I think I have made a decision on the iPod nano (8 GB) in either silver or black for use as a media player when I am on the go, however I am also considering replacing my cell phone on the 11th of July with an iPhone 3G which could kill two birds with one stone so to speak (I really don't like the Motorola RAZR V3). I'll keep everyone updated on what happens.

Get the iPod Classic. I run ALOT at around the 6 min/mile mark and I hold the iPod in my hand and it plays with no problems at all. If you want a dedicated music player with a bonus ability to play videos, then that's all you need. iPod Touch and iPod Nano are more like fashion statements than anything else.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!