Recommended Posts

I really don't think this is a good idea, to disable direct text input in the <input type="file"> input box, as a security "fix" against a theoretical attack. The reasoning is IMHO ridiculous, it's like saying to prevent potential phishing attacks, all text input box should be disabled. Or to prevent possible trojan downloads, file download should be disabled. The change is really annoying and a great usability drawback, especially when uploading multiple files at once. And it can be easily bypassed by truly malicious sites with flash, java applet, silverlight, etc. making this security "fix" mostly moot. And that's why Firefox 3 has anti-phishing and anti-malware features from the first place right?

Also I think there can be many better alternatives than just disabling the file input box and leaving a confusing interface, like disabling certain stylings of the file input control, gave warnings when there are file uploads to a site for the first time, etc.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/644517-file-input-box-in-firefox-3/
Share on other sites

How is it not a reasonable security measure? And where is there a confusing interface now? If you've used a file open dialog, you know how to choose a file for upload.

The interface is confusing as there's a text input box, but when you click the input box, a file open dialog pops up, that goes against any user expectation of a text input box (or at least the appearance of one).

It's not a reasonable security measure because it outright disabled the text input function just because someone can custom style it to trick people into entering sensitive data. It's like saying, since someone can custom style a page to look like some online banking service and trick people into entering their bank account password into it (phishing), so we should outright disable direct text input in web pages? I think Firefox 3's anti-phishing and anti-malware features are added exactly to counter this kind of bad guys, so we don't need to disable text input or file download to prevent possible exploits from them.

And it's mostly a moot security measure since real malicious people can bypass it easily. So Firefox 3 tried to fix a theoretical security hole (and this "fix" can be bypassed easily) by completely altering the expected behavior of the file input box that leads to great usability problems and resulting in a completely non-sensical UI (a text input box that functions like a button). And this same "security hole" can be fixed with far less drastic means. I don't think this is a good idea IMHO.

And people are allowed to turn the Anti-Phishing and Anti-Malware features off in Firefox3, but there's no option to turn the file input box back on? I'd say that makes little sense.

Safari doesn't even have a text field with a file form element.

yea, and Safari didn't even have a download confirmation dialog (until they just fix it in 3.1.2). It's from Apple, so I guess it's expected to have some great neat features accompanied by some really strange weird usability problems and/or quirks. But then at least Safari's implementation doesn't show a text input box, thus less confusing.

The real problem for me is that Firefox 3 file inputs only seem to return the file name, not the full path.

This is different from Firefox 2 and with Internet Explorer when working from the same 'URL security zone' (see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms535128.aspx).

See www.samdutton.com/firefox.html for an example.

The reason they've done this, is so you can't hide the button via CSS and trick people into thinking it's a normal text-box (so you can upload files on their system without them knowing it).

People whined and bitched at Safari for doing the same thing.

There is a work around for it: http://damnmachine.com/128/fx3_upload-fix.html

well, "drag n' drop" doesn't help the situation much, since one still can't just copy&paste multiple file names without the file browser popping up repeatedly, a real usability drawback with multiple file uploads.

The reason they've done this, is so you can't hide the button via CSS and trick people into thinking it's a normal text-box (so you can upload files on their system without them knowing it).

well, by the same logic, to prevent phishing, they should disable all input box by default, and enable them only after you have scanned through the whole URL with the mouse pointer or cursor keys.

really, there are much better ways to deal with this potential "security hole", without drastically changing the behavior of the file input box and ending up with a confusing UI.

But then people can be tricked into uploading files with a simple flash form anyway.

People whined and bitched at Safari for doing the same thing.

Apparently they still need to whine and bitch some more to make Apple add an option to prompt before saving files in the Mac OS X version :laugh:

The file selector uploads files, it isn't comparable to a plain text box, I don't see why you're even using that argument.

And just because there are multiple ways to do it (like through Flash), doesn't mean we shouldn't bother fixing any of them ("I was going to lock my door, but then I noticed my window was open, so I left my door unlocked").

The file selector uploads files, it isn't comparable to a plain text box, I don't see why you're even using that argument.

It's changing the behavior of the file input box drastically, so it's very comparable to drastically changing the behavior of the plain text box for some potential exploits.

A site exploiting the file input box to trick you into uploading files in disguise of a normal text input is comparable to a site exploiting the password text input to trick you into entering your password in disguise of an online banking site. So Firefox "fixing" the file input box by completely disabling the text input, it's indeed comparable to "fixing" the password text box by requiring you first scan through the URL to prevent phishing.

They are both examples of over-reactions against some "security holes", one is already implemented in Firefox 3, the other hypothetical, but both are at the same level of absurdity, both are "let's fix a security hole by a drastic measure that greatly reduces the usability, while other much less drastic and more user-friendly alternatives are clearly available". That's why I'm using this argument. There's no good reason behind this file input "fix", just like there'd be no good reason to disable password input box until a full scan of URL.

And just because there are multiple ways to do it (like through Flash), doesn't mean we shouldn't bother fixing any of them ("I was going to lock my door, but then I noticed my window was open, so I left my door unlocked").

The point is that such drastic "fix" leads to great usability problems, in the name of "fixing" a "security hole" which it doesn't patch up anyway. It's like giving your door a complex lock that takes hours to open, but leaving the windows with a normal lock, so the legal inhabitants of the house has to spend hours to enter their own home, while a real thief can still enter the house easily under minutes, is just not logical.

Not to mention when they have enforced such drastical measures against the file input box with no option to turn it off, but give easy options to turn off the anti-phishing and anti-malware features, it's simply ridiculous and shows a severe lack of consistency in their logic and reasoning regarding "security".

This new text box drove me CRAZY. I couldn't take it one more minute so now I use IE (ugh) when I'm doing a lot of uploads or other such activities.

At work I upload updated data files to various websites, ours and our clients', so there are endless variations of the same bunch of data. I might need to import a set of 5 files in 3 or 4 different formats (ex: NewData1.csv, NewData2.csv; NewData1.txt, NewData2.txt, etc.) to 9 different websites.

Before this crappy new feature ruined my life, I was able to browse for the first file, then copy and paste the path/filename into the other admin pages, and THEN simply change a number in the filename and click import to upload the next file. Now with copy/paste and editing disabled I have to browse through dozens or hundreds of files and click the file I need every single time, over and over and over and over and over and over. It's a MAJOR pain. I broke up the dir with hundreds of data files, then I made separate "recent ULs" dirs, but with so many formats that filled up too, so then I was constantly shifting files into old, new, staging, recent (and onandonandon) directories, trying other things to make life easier. By the time I got to making "AAADataFile6.csv", then renaming it after the upload, I realized I'd gone off the deep end and was going to need to check into a rest home. I wised up and dusted off my IE icon.

I haven't had IE visible on my desktop in years, but now there it is in all it's glory. I hope the FF developers that came up with this garbage feature are proud of themselves.

I hate, hate hate that new feature.

It's changing the behavior of the file input box drastically, so it's very comparable to drastically changing the behavior of the plain text box for some potential exploits.

A site exploiting the file input box to trick you into uploading files in disguise of a normal text input is comparable to a site exploiting the password text input to trick you into entering your password in disguise of an online banking site. So Firefox "fixing" the file input box by completely disabling the text input, it's indeed comparable to "fixing" the password text box by requiring you first scan through the URL to prevent phishing.

They are both examples of over-reactions against some "security holes", one is already implemented in Firefox 3, the other hypothetical, but both are at the same level of absurdity, both are "let's fix a security hole by a drastic measure that greatly reduces the usability, while other much less drastic and more user-friendly alternatives are clearly available". That's why I'm using this argument. There's no good reason behind this file input "fix", just like there'd be no good reason to disable password input box until a full scan of URL.

The point is that such drastic "fix" leads to great usability problems, in the name of "fixing" a "security hole" which it doesn't patch up anyway. It's like giving your door a complex lock that takes hours to open, but leaving the windows with a normal lock, so the legal inhabitants of the house has to spend hours to enter their own home, while a real thief can still enter the house easily under minutes, is just not logical.

Not to mention when they have enforced such drastical measures against the file input box with no option to turn it off, but give easy options to turn off the anti-phishing and anti-malware features, it's simply ridiculous and shows a severe lack of consistency in their logic and reasoning regarding "security".

Can you explain to me exactly what has your panties in a twist? Like what action I need to take to duplicate the behaviour this non-issue fix, as you call it?

Can you explain to me exactly what has your panties in a twist? Like what action I need to take to duplicate the behaviour this non-issue fix, as you call it?

can you explain to me exactly what you mean by this? I think I've already stated quite clearly what this so-called "security fix" affects, the file input box, ie. any <input type=file> HTML control.

if you want an example, then just go to http://xs.to and click the input box before the "Choose..." button.

Can you explain to me exactly what has your panties in a twist? Like what action I need to take to duplicate the behaviour this non-issue fix, as you call it?

Well, did you read my post (right before yours)?? You just TRY selecting 10-20 files and see how long it takes in FF as opposed to IE or the old FF, where you can copy and paste, or [heaven forbid!] actually TYPE a path/filename.

In the new FF, at least 5-10 seconds each. 20 files with dir browsing is well over 3 mins, just to select the files.

In old FF or IE, it takes as long as you need to go to the next tab, click the box, and hit CRTL-V. Less than 2 secs, all 20 files ready for upload in less than a minute. Less than ONE THIRD the time.

And, yes, 3 mins is a big deal. It means just one of my tasks takes 3x longer than necessary. 3 mins or 3 hours, it adds up.

  • 2 weeks later...
Well, did you read my post (right before yours)?? You just TRY selecting 10-20 files and see how long it takes in FF as opposed to IE or the old FF, where you can copy and paste, or [heaven forbid!] actually TYPE a path/filename.

You know you can type paths in the file upload dialog box, right? What's the difference? You click in the upload field in Fx3 (like you would anyway to make the cursor go there). and you paste the path in the File Name line.

The time you waste opening multiple tabs and hitting Upload multiple times is a saver to you?

can you explain to me exactly what you mean by this? I think I've already stated quite clearly what this so-called "security fix" affects, the file input box, ie. any <input type=file> HTML control.

if you want an example, then just go to http://xs.to and click the input box before the "Choose..." button.

It does the same as if you hit the browse button. What is the big deal?

  • 4 weeks later...
You know you can type paths in the file upload dialog box, right? What's the difference? You click in the upload field in Fx3 (like you would anyway to make the cursor go there). and you paste the path in the File Name line.

The time you waste opening multiple tabs and hitting Upload multiple times is a saver to you?

Another problem with this "feature": because you can not edit in the text box, it is IMPOSSIBLE to remove a file once it's in there. I selected a file and then made a lot of edits on the page. Then I decided that I didn't want to replace the file on the server, but there was NO WAY to remove the contents of that box. I had to cancel the entire transaction.

THIS can not be fixed by pasting into the File Open dialog box.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Weekend PC Game Deals: Anno 117, Final Fantasy VII, Rematch, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Weekend PC Game Deals is where the hottest gaming deals from all over the internet are gathered into one place every week for your consumption. So kick back, relax, and hold on to your wallets. The Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways may have ended, but its regular freebies didn't miss a step this week. The double drop was for copies of Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks and The Ouroboros King. Speed Freeks lands for multiplayer racing fans, but with plenty of competitive shooting elements too. You will be piloting Ork buggies, tanks, and aircraft modeled after the popular tabletop miniatures while trying to complete objectives and pass finish lines. Next, Ouroboros King is a crossover between chess and tactical roguelikes, offering the chance to create your own army with special rules to beat incoming foes on the board. The double giveaway on the Epic Games Store will be available until June 11, and replacing it will be Citizen Sleeper and ROBOBEAT. The Humble Store brought a new charity bundle to check out this week too. Landing with the name The Complete Inkle Library, this is a large collection of interactive narrative puzzle games from the publisher Inkle. This begins with Heaven's Vault, four parts from the Sorcery series, 80 Days, Overboard, and Pendragon: Narrative Tactics within the starting tier for $9. Hopping up a step to the $12 tier gets you TR-49, Expelled, and A Highland Song for paying at least $12. If you go for the $20 tier, you get four e-books from the Heaven's Vault series. The bundle has almost three weeks on its counter before it goes away. Big Deals There is a larger than normal amount of weekend specials happening this time, including multiple publisher deals, franchise discounts, and indie gems to grab. With those and more, here's our hand-picked big deals list for the weekend: Anno 117: Pax Romana – $44.99 on Steam Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 – $39.99 on Steam Timberborn – $27.99 on Steam EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 6 – $26.39 on Steam Rust – $19.99 on Steam FINAL FANTASY VII REBIRTH – $19.99 on Steam Street Fighter 6 – $19.99 on Steam Returnal – $19.79 on Steam Shape of Dreams – $17.49 on Steam Far Cry 6 – $14.99 on Steam Assassin's Creed Valhalla – $14.99 on Steam Quarantine Zone: The Last Check – $14.99 on Steam REMATCH – $14.99 on Steam EA SPORTS FC 26 – $13.99 on Steam FINAL FANTASY VII REMAKE INTERGRADE – $13.99 on Steam Magicraft – $12.79 on Steam Cult of the Lamb – $12.49 on Steam Dying Light 2: Reloaded Edition – $11.99 on Steam Cuphead – $11.99 on Steam Assassin's Creed Odyssey – $11.99 on Steam Hunt: Showdown 1896 – $11.99 on Steam Sektori – $11.99 on Steam Just Shapes & Beats – $11.99 on Steam Gunfire Reborn – $10.99 on Steam 33 Immortals – $9.99 on Epic Store Baby Steps – $9.99 on Steam Sifu – $9.99 on Steam Hearts of Iron IV – $9.99 on Steam DREDGE – $9.99 on Steam DAVE THE DIVER – $9.99 on Steam Pacific Drive – $9.89 on Steam Mycopunk – $9.74 on Steam Sons Of The Forest – $8.99 on Steam Jotunnslayer: Hordes of Hel – $8.99 on Steam Nuclear Throne – $8.99 on Steam Mechabellum – $8.99 on Steam Deep Rock Galactic: Survivor – $8.44 on Steam TerraTech Legion – $7.99 on Steam Inscryption – $7.99 on Steam Assassin's Creed Unity – $7.49 on Steam Minishoot' Adventures – $7.49 on Steam The Stanley Parable – $7.49 on Steam Oxygen Not Included – $7.49 on Steam Megabonk – $6.99 on Steam Look Outside – $5.99 on Steam Vampire Hunters – $5.24 on Steam MOTHERGUNSHIP – $4.99 on Steam My Friend Pedro – $3.99 on Steam The Messenger – $3.99 on Steam Vampire Survivors – $3.74 on Steam Brotato – $2.99 on Steam Enter the Gungeon – $2.99 on Steam Loop Hero – $2.99 on Steam GRIS – $2.99 on Steam Exit the Gungeon – $2.49 on Steam Hitman: Absolution – $1.99 on Steam CARRION – $1.99 on Steam Don't Starve Together – $1.49 on Steam Golf With Your Friends – $1.49 on Steam Hotline Miami – $0.99 on Steam The Ouroboros King – $0 on Epic Store Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks – $0 on Epic Store DRM-free Specials Hopping over to the DRM-free deals, the GOG store has plenty of discounts running this weekend too. Here are some highlights: Fallout 4: Game of the Year Edition - $15.99 on GOG Fallout: New Vegas Ultimate Edition - $9.99 on GOG Disco Elysium - The Final Cut - $9.99 on GOG Crysis - $9.99 on GOG Tyranny - Standard Edition - $7.49 on GOG Frostpunk: Game of the Year Edition - $7.35 on GOG Banished - $6.79 on GOG Fallout 3: Game of the Year Edition - $6.59 on GOG The Forgotten City - $6.25 on GOG The Age of Decadence - $5.99 on GOG SimCity 3000 Unlimited - $4.99 on GOG Assassin's Creed: Director's Cut - $4.99 on GOG SimCity 4 Deluxe Edition - $3.99 on GOG Vampyr - $3.99 on GOG Torchlight II - $3.99 on GOG Deus Ex GOTY Edition - $3.49 on GOG Primordia - $3.09 on GOG Theme Hospital - $2.99 on GOG SimCity 2000 Special Edition - $2.99 on GOG Total Annihilation: Kingdoms + Iron Plague - $2.99 on GOG Deus Ex: Human Revolution - Director’s Cut - $2.99 on GOG Master of Orion 1+2 - $2.39 on GOG Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time - $1.99 on GOG Prince of Persia: Warrior Within - $1.99 on GOG EVERSPACE - $1.99 on GOG Total Annihilation: Commander Pack - $0.99 on GOG Keep in mind that availability and pricing for some deals could vary depending on the region. That's it for our pick of this weekend's PC game deals, and hopefully, some of you have enough self-restraint not to keep adding to your ever-growing backlogs. As always, there are an enormous number of other deals ready and waiting all over the interwebs, as well as on services you may already subscribe to if you comb through them, so keep your eyes open for those, and have a great weekend.
    • When will the Photos app be updated to remember the window size and position when reopened? They addressed this issue in a 2024 version of the app (though I can't recall the build number). Unfortunately, after that specific version, the problem persists! Please prioritise this fix in your K2 schedule. Additionally, the Snipping Tool has lost the ability to capture the Windows Taskbar starting from the 2024 version!
    • Same, never saw it on Android or iOS. Guess only some people got it *shrugs*
    • Anthropic pulls Fable 5 and Mythos 5 after US export control order by Pradeep Viswanathan In April this year, Anthropic launched the Claude Mythos Preview frontier model with state-of-the-art cyber and coding capabilities for a select set of companies around the world. After preparing appropriate guardrails, early this week, Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5, its most capable AI models. Claude Fable 5 is for general users and comes with strict safeguards, while Mythos 5 is designed with fewer safeguards for cybersecurity and biology use cases. Today, Anthropic abruptly suspended access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 AI models for all customers after receiving an export control directive from the US government. The company received the directive from the government today at 5:21 p.m. ET, and the received letter did not provide any details regarding the national security concern. Anthropic understands that the government became aware of a method to bypass, or “jailbreak,” Fable 5, which might be the reason behind the directive. The order was issued under national security authorities and requires the company to suspend all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by any foreign national, whether they are inside or outside the United States. The restriction also applies to foreign national employees working at Anthropic. As a result, the company has disabled both models for all customers to ensure compliance. Access to previous Anthropic models like Opus and Sonnet is not affected by this government order. The company highlighted that it had developed strong safeguards to reduce the possibility that Fable is misused for tasks related to cybersecurity. In fact, many developers are complaining that the safeguards are going overboard. Additionally, the company worked with the US government, the UK AISI, multiple private third-party organizations, and internal teams to red-team Fable’s safeguards for thousands of hours. Finally, Anthropic noted that no testers have yet been able to find a universal jailbreak on Fable 5. As expected, Anthropic disagrees that a narrow potential jailbreak should lead to the recall of a commercial model used by hundreds of millions of people. It warned that applying this standard across the AI industry could effectively halt new frontier model deployments. Anthropic concluded by mentioning that it is working to restore access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 as soon as possible and plans to share more details within the next 24 hours.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      92
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!