Dodge SX 2.0 (aka Neon) - Opinions?


Recommended Posts

Greetings!

Within the next two weeks, I'm planning on buying my first car, now that I've finished school and got a new job and all. So today, I went around to find out which models I should look into and I'm seriously considering getting this 2005 Dodge SX 2.0. It's got 64 000 km, loaded, a spoiler, very good fuel economy (8.0 L/100 km city, 5.9 L/100 km highway), and a 5-speed manual; and it's currently selling for $8000 CDN. In spite of this, I am also concerned about whether such a low price point could indicate something bad, seeing how other 2005 cars such as the Mazda3, Civic, and Corolla sell for at least $14 000 CDN. Yet on the other hand, I know some people who used to drive older Neons and they were pretty reliable.

While I plan to do a test drive next week, I would like to know what some of the other forum members think about the SX 2.0 (Neon in the USA) and see whether I should go for that or one of the following alternatives I'm also considering:

- 2005 Honda Civic (70 000 km, loaded, sunroof, 5-speed manual; $14 500 CDN) - However, I could also get one for less than $11 000, which does have some dents on the roof resulting from a recent hail storm.

- 2008 Toyota Yaris Sedan base w/ 5-speed manual ($14 535 after $500 grad rebate and eligible for $1000 government rebate)

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/646069-dodge-sx-20-aka-neon-opinions/
Share on other sites

OK. I've checked out some reviews for this vehicle and while they indicated issues such as noise levels and cheap interiors; these problems are also reflected in the other domestics for that year (2005) and these problems are minor to me for now. What I am looking for is a used vehicle that is fuel efficient, fun to drive, somewhat reliable, and no more than four years old.

Now to set the record straight, I would much rather get a Civic or Corolla over the domestics any day, but the problem is that I find the prices of the used versions to be unjustified. After all, I could purchase a new 2009 Corolla CE (base model) for around the same price as the 2005 model ($15 000)! The other domestic compacts are similarly priced, but I feel the SX 2.0 is superior to the Cavalier/Cobalt and Focus; given its comparable performance and superior fuel economy, especially with the 5-speed manual. So my question is the following: Is it really worth paying double the price of a used domestic compact in order to get a used import (or a new Corolla)?

OK. I've checked out some reviews for this vehicle and while they indicated issues such as noise levels and cheap interiors; these problems are also reflected in the other domestics for that year (2005) and these problems are minor to me for now. What I am looking for is a used vehicle that is fuel efficient, fun to drive, somewhat reliable, and no more than four years old.

Now to set the record straight, I would much rather get a Civic or Corolla over the domestics any day, but the problem is that I find the prices of the used versions to be unjustified. After all, I could purchase a new 2009 Corolla CE (base model) for around the same price as the 2005 model ($15 000)! The other domestic compacts are similarly priced, but I feel the SX 2.0 is superior to the Cavalier/Cobalt and Focus; given its comparable performance and superior fuel economy, especially with the 5-speed manual. So my question is the following: Is it really worth paying double the price of a used domestic compact in order to get a used import (or a new Corolla)?

if it means you aren't getting an sx 2.0 then ya, it's worth it. As I said, I love Dodge, I used to sell them. I NEVER encouraged anybody to buy and sx 2.0. They are very unreliable. I'll list a few common things: engine mounts: they suck; alignment issues galore, you nudged that curb when parallel parkng? You need an alignment; lighting, there's gremlins in the lights I tells ya! Why is ONE foglight on without any of the other lights being on for instance? These happen very frequently. The engine itself is pretty good, but everything else is quite the opposite.

After 2003 the above mentioned issues were taken care of... The fog lights were a big deal, including overheating of the switch but the mount and gasket issues were also all taken care of. I almost bought a 2003 and was trying to sell my 05 Honda Civic Si coupe to get one because my coupe is a pretty car, but an auto. This baby right here. I think I'm just gonna keep it until I'm no longer upside down on the lien though. 2005 Civic Brian If you're looking for an SX at least make sure it's the R/T in my opinion though... 150 hp over the base's what, 120 some?

They definitely were. To the OP, read around some more, the car isn't a bad buy... You have to understand that the noise level is a subjective opinion and the 2.0 is a very reliable engine. I would say take it for a drive and make your own decision. I absolutely love the clutch feel and steering of the car compared to standard Civics I drove and I was quite impressed with the trim of the car I drove. I will say that the one I drove had the leather option and the 6 CD changer but the A/C is top notch compared to my car and I was happier with the stock stereo in that car over mine. Definitely avoid the automatic transmission in those cars, the setup didn't change from when they were a three speed so it is a little rough but the 5-speed, just like any Neon from the beginning was a good buy. Take it for a drive and base your own opinion on the drive rather than the reviews. I like my Civic but I liked the SX 2.0 better. I will never buy a 2 door sport compact again I will tell you that!

Dude, I've seen hundreds of these cars and almost every one of them that came to us used had these problems, no matter what year it was. These problems were not "fixed" in the 2003 model of the SX2.0, it was the first year for them. If you're comparing to the neon, then ya, they fixed a lot of the neon's problems, but the issues I listed are in every year of the SX2.0 (2003-2005). It sounds like you are just comparing to one you drove on a rental or something. As I said I've seen hundreds of these things when I was selling them. They are not good cars at all.

It's the same car, the only addition for 2003 was the name change and the 4 speed auto. The 2003 and later cars DO have the issues fix, especially the 2004's and 2005's, and if you look at the predicted reliability of the cars from CR for those years, you'll see above average. Looking back on them now as well, you'll see that from 2003 and onwards (2003 being the start of the fixes) the cars were solid. The issue you get will small sportyesqe cars is the drivers, and if you drive any car into the ground you'll have an issue. Just like with a Civic, make sure before you buy it you learn it's history because you can have a car that the previous owner slaughtered because they thought it was a sports car. I'm not a Dodge fan, but I evaluated the SX for over 6 months, drove 13 different cars, talked to mechs and read every possible thing I could because I wanted the car. To the OP, give it a shout, try it out and read some more reviews but don't let them sway your opinion. As long as the car is 2003 or newer, it's a good buy. Please, please, please don't buy a Cavalier or Sunfire though :D

I really reccomend a used Civic, although I know you just wrote it off for being expensive. I just bought an 02 Civic in great shape at CarMax for ~$10,000, with very low mileage. Yeah, it's more expensive than a comparable domestic, but the track record for the Hondas are much better, as well. Plus, it gets ~40 mpg. I don't think Neons do that, but not sure.

Lots of hate for the poor Neon. Not gonna lie, there ARE better choices but I wouldn't fully discount it is what I'm getting at. The 2005 Civic you're listing is about on par with what I was asking for mine, I was trying to sell it for 15.5 but it's got just over half the mileage of that one.

Earlier model Neons were some of the better ones. The age when Chrysler wasnt cost cutting so much, as they have from about 2002+. Neons are very very VERY small cars, so if you are a big person, dont even bother. Head room is limited, side space is limited, and you can probably park the darned thing in your hallway. But other than it being a small car, it does have good fuel economy, and I see them left and right running strong. The only problem is, you have to choose the right one, inspect the hell out of it and ask if there are any extended warranties available. These cars were a big elderly people attraction, and Ive seen elderly people go 17K miles without an oil change, among other things. Check its background, how many owners its had, reason for sale, etc etc and you should be fine.

My biased opinion? Go for a Chrysler 300M. Its the car I drive and I love it! Roomy, comfortable, sporty look, powerful enough. But I never said that. :rolleyes:

  • 1 month later...

Well FYI, I chose not to get the Dodge SX 2.0 after all. Instead, I just put a down payment on a 2008 Civic DX-G with manual transmission and will be picking it up tomorrow. Drives so much nicer than the 2009 Corolla and gets similar fuel economy.

Great choice on the Civic (Y)

Why didn't you get the LX? It's only $1000 more. :p (And so goes the ugly rims :| )

The LX is a bit too expensive for me, but I like those rims better anyway! :D However, driving a stick sure takes some time to get used to. First drove it yesterday and I must have stalled at least ten times, but I'm starting to get the hang of it now and it's definitely better than with the automatic I did the test drive on a couple of weekends ago.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!