No more Windows 2008 for me..


Recommended Posts

Hello..

First of all I must say I'm a Windows user and Power user, and have no intentions of working with Linux or MAC OS, when at work it's needed I'll work with Linux and MAC but I'm no fan boy of them..

So don't think this just another hate topic on Vista and Server 2008.. Far from that.. This is my own experience and that's all..

I have a Server machine at home, where I have my own shared files for my home network and work on VPN's from my clients using it..

Also, I have legit Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008 licenses, for enterprise versions..

Yes very expensive licenses, but I had and have the money so why not and it's not like I have to buy it each year or two :)

Also it's good to have a nice real Test Lab ( I use sometimes server virtualization software, but prefer the real deal ) when I need to test configurations to apply to my clients servers..

I had Windows Server 2003 32bit, installed until 3 months ago, when I made the decision to migrate for Windows Server 2008 32bit, so I could learn the new features and changes made since 2003.. Always best to know what your costumers may need and how to do it..

My hardware is not a High-end Luxury System or last or current generation, but for a file server and VPN connections I think it's very good..

P4 3.0 HT Prescott - Nvidia 6200 256MB, 2 Sata disks 320GB and 500GB, Gigabit LAN, 2 GB of DDR 400 Kingston..

So after I installed Windows Server 2008, I noted a very big decrease on performance, comparing to 2003, on daily use..

But I thought well, maybe the drivers aren't really Windows Server 2008 optimized, I guess I should just wait a few months to see what the Manufactures release..

Also, I understand that every new OS uses more System resources and I don't have a problem with that, I mean XP was released on 2001, Vista on 2006, more new features usually mean more Hardware power needed to run it and Hardware Manufactures need to earn more money for there shareholders ;)

And now after installing a Torrent client, Azureus 3.1.0.0 ( yes it's not the more light one, but it works like I want ), it uses 100MB - 150MB and Windows Server 2008 has 0 free RAM available.. And no other 3rd party software is running..

So how the hell ( apology for the expression ) does Windows Server 2008 needs 2 GB of Ram to run a Torrent client?

And yes, this is after a fresh restart..

Sure Windows Vista has the feature of using all RAM available to load the applications faster, but Windows Server 2008 has that off by default..

My pagefile.sys is being heavily used on a machine with 2 GB of RAM..

My last retry will be with VLite, I'll try to remove some components that I don't need and check if is one of them that's causing such a bloated OS.. It's bad for me since I may need to test one of them, but well...

Is this acceptable, 2 GB of RAM wasted by Windows Server 2008 on a Torrent client?

Sure RAM is cheap this days, but please do I need 3 GB or even migrating to 64 bit and have 8GB of RAM to run a Torrent client on Windows Server 2008???

Thank you for reading my Topic :)

Edited by Digitalfox
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/646215-no-more-windows-2008-for-me/
Share on other sites

A better question would by why are you running a Torrent client on a server?

I have recently setup server 200 on my dev box. an old dell dimension 2800 with 1GB RAM and a celeron 2.8 processor. And it runs fine. No slowdowns with the usual roles installed: AD, DNS, DHCP, etc

A better question would by why are you running a Torrent client on a server?

I have recently setup server 200 on my dev box. an old dell dimension 2800 with 1GB RAM and a celeron 2.8 processor. And it runs fine. No slowdowns with the usual roles installed: AD, DNS, DHCP, etc

It's simple, my desktop MB has broken on Friday, and I have to wait 2 weeks for a replacement..

So I need the Server to run the torrent client..

Also what's the problem on that? I mean, is there a reason for a Windows Server OS not to run a torrent client application?

I don't think so.. :)

But back on topic, the only thing I can think of, are the drivers..

But drivers for Vista should run fine on Windows Server 2008, after all they share the same core :)

Edited by Digitalfox

Well, servers are just that, servers. They should be configured and left alone.

I have not used Azureus in a while but last time i did it was Java based. Could be that Java is creating your high usage? Have you tried other torrent clients?

Seems to me you installed Azureus and then spat your dummy out because it used too much CPU.

Did you even look at what was eating up your cpu usage?

i think your biggest problem here is running 2008 on an old platform. that machine is considered ancient these days. i bet most of those issues would completely disappear w/ modern hardware. i beta tested 2008 on an older Pentium 4 server and it ran really well. i havent used it since RC1 though.

Fist of all anyone that can afford to pay for a REAL version of Server 2008 for a desktop machine MUST have the money to shove some NEW hardware to it. Also, server 2008 LOVES memory. I wouldn't even attempt to run it with less then 4GB.

+1

Did you switch the Advanced memory options from System Cache to Programs... That could possibly be why it is using more resources...and also under the Processor Scheduling from Background Services to programs.

Those two options are the main difference in how Windows uses Memory and Processor between a Server OS and a Desktop OS.

Well, servers are just that, servers. They should be configured and left alone.

I have not used Azureus in a while but last time i did it was Java based. Could be that Java is creating your high usage? Have you tried other torrent clients?

Seems to me you installed Azureus and then spat your dummy out because it used too much CPU.

Did you even look at what was eating up your cpu usage?

I told in topic post that this a Lab machine..

I have no problems with CPU usage, It's RAM I'm concerned..

Also I've been a Neowin member since 2001, with almost 8 years around and only 500 posts, why?

Because I don't come here posting stuff at the first minute of a problem, I do my research first and only after no real clues found, I came here posting in the forums asking for help on people who might had that problem before and may present a solution.. :)

Why don't you check Task manager and the Reliability and Performance monitor to see what's hogging your processor, harddrive and memory then?

Ofcourse I did, how would I know other way on what RAM I had available and what RAM Azureus was using.. :)

Theres like 20 or 30 services/processes running from the OS itself, all using 15, 16, 17 MB etc.. But that's normal..

Windows needs those services and processes started and running :)

Checked your processes in task manager? Whats the most RAM consuming process?

Like I said Azureus using 100 - 150 MB of RAM :)

i think your biggest problem here is running 2008 on an old platform. that machine is considered ancient these days. i bet most of those issues would completely disappear w/ modern hardware. i beta tested 2008 on an older Pentium 4 server and it ran really well. i havent used it since RC1 though.

I agree it isn't the best and newest hardware around, but I think it's not that bad right?

I thought 2 GB should run Windows Server 2008 and Azureus just fine, but I was wrong :)

Fist of all anyone that can afford to pay for a REAL version of Server 2008 for a desktop machine MUST have the money to shove some NEW hardware to it. Also, server 2008 LOVES memory. I wouldn't even attempt to run it with less then 4GB.

I didn't say I wouldn't if needed, buy new Hardware, I was just not expecting a so much heavy OS on RAM..

And because Windows Server 2003 run so well on it, I didn't think a upgrade was needed..

Please I gave in 2005, 4000€ for my MCSE certification on Windows Server 2003, even if I didn't want to buy Windows Server licenses I have at home 6 Server 2003 CD's with 6 Test serials for 6 months each..

But I did the right thing and bought a 2008 license, what's wrong with that?

The 2003 license was bought to me, by me ex boss, for me to learn stuff on company's we worked on that the time..

Also I have just renew my TechNet subscription.. So please stop the nonsense that it's a lie my licenses..

I work for my own and earn well, Networks is a well paid job here in Portugal..

Edited by Digitalfox

Right Click on your My Computer ... Choose properties.... advanced tab... then under performance... click settings...then the advanced tab again...

That is where you find the Processor Scheduling and the Memory usage options I was talking about.

In XP it is both set form Programs. On servers it is set for Background Services and also System Cache.

Probably the one you want to change is the one from System Cache to Programs. But try both and see if it Makes any improvement.

Right Click on your My Computer ... Choose properties.... advanced tab... then under performance... click settings...then the advanced tab again...

That is where you find the Processor Scheduling and the Memory usage options I was talking about.

In XP it is both set form Programs. On servers it is set for Background Services and also System Cache.

Probably the one you want to change is the one from System Cache to Programs. But try both and see if it Makes any improvement.

Sorry I didn't reply to your first post, I've missed it :)

I'm not around the server right now, but I remember when I installed the OS to have done that :)

First off you do not have only 0 MB of RAM left, you might want to look up how memory is managed now... its just just holding stuff in use, its holding predictive loaded items also... second off... no way in heck do you only have 0 MB left... at work on a REAL server we have SQL Server which uses massive amounts of caching in memory on a 4GB 64bit system (this is a test system our live system has 64GB of RAM) and it NEVER ran out of memory, ever... and this is on W2K8 Server x64 Standard edition...

Are you sure that your server actually has a problem and that the ram has not been consumed just for caching just like vista. it may be that there's no problem at all...

If you use it like an a "real" server do the server functions perform slowly? eg: file and print, web, db etc

First off you do not have only 0 MB of RAM left, you might want to look up how memory is managed now... its just just holding stuff in use, its holding predictive loaded items also... second off... no way in heck do you only have 0 MB left... at work on a REAL server we have SQL Server which uses massive amounts of caching in memory on a 4GB 64bit system (this is a test system our live system has 64GB of RAM) and it NEVER ran out of memory, ever... and this is on W2K8 Server x64 Standard edition...

I agree i am doing the same thing with Windows 2008 Server x64 + SQL Server 2005 x64 + Virtual Server 2005 SP1 x64. It's mainly used for testing in which i have a few 13-20GB Databases.

The machine is a P4 3.60GHZ 4GB RAM 1TB SATA Machine and it runs quicker than Windows 2003.

First i was sceptical, however after running some file sharing and database tasks on it, i was impressed with it's improved memory management and very fast file sharing.

The server idles on about 700-800MB usage in task manager, however you do have to reprogram yourself to read the task manager in a different way. Windows 2003 would show about 200MB usage however Windows 2008 is reporting a more correct view of your memory usage. It separates the physical ram (in graph display) from the pagefile.

When performing some complex sql queries on the 13GB databases the memory usage went straight up to the full 4GB usage with the pagefile coming into play a lot more. However after a few minutes of inactivity the usage went back down to 700-800MB mark.

I would really recommend trying windows 2008 again, perhaps trying the x64 edition. I think it would help you in the future as Microsoft is pushing their server technologies hard over to x64 so it would make an excellent learning environment for your lab.

Server 2008 functions exactly like Vista when it comes to memory allocation, it'll preload as much as it can in cache, hence the "0" Ram available

should you look more closely at your task manager, you'll see something like

Physical Memory :

Total : 2048

Cached : 1300+

Free : 0

As soon as you'll load applicatons not in the cache you'll see the cache value decreasing, which is absolutely normal

On the performance issues... my personal home server is a Dual Core AMD Opteron 185 (socket 939..not exactly brand new...) with 2Gb of DDR400 runing on a pair of raided raptors (Raid1) and with 4 1Tb drives in Raid 5 for storage, I have 4 websites, 2 FTPs, 6 teamspeak server instances and it also serves as a HD Streamer for my HTPC setup... Windows Server 2008 Std just flies on that setup, I don't see how it wouldn't on a similarly powerful setup like yours.

so you got windows server 2008 so you know how to service your "clients," but your problem is with torrent which I am sure you are only using for legal file sharing. Do all your "clients" also use torrents? Usually "clients" who use torrents do their own thing and do not hire someone else to do work on their servers.

Server 2008 functions exactly like Vista when it comes to memory allocation, it'll preload as much as it can in cache, hence the "0" Ram available

should you look more closely at your task manager, you'll see something like

Physical Memory :

Total : 2048

Cached : 1300+

Free : 0

As soon as you'll load applicatons not in the cache you'll see the cache value decreasing, which is absolutely normal

I thought SuperFetch was disabled by default on Server 2008? That is the caching service you are referring to in Vista, so if you turned on the service on your server, yes that will happen, otherwise I have rebooted my Server 2008 just now and the cache is very small even though having several apps open frequenelty.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
    • Samsung Galaxy XR arrives in the UK with new AI and enterprise features by Fiza Ali Samsung is bringing its Galaxy XR headset to the UK several months after the device made its debut as the first headset built on Google's Android XR platform. The headset was first teased in late 2024 alongside Google's introduction of Android XR before making its commercial debut in 2025. Developed in collaboration with Google and Qualcomm, Galaxy XR combines mixed reality experiences with Gemini-powered AI features, allowing users to interact with digital content using voice, gestures, and visual inputs. While the hardware itself remains largely unchanged from the version Samsung unveiled last year, the company is using the UK launch to spotlight several software enhancements that have arrived through recent updates. Among the most notable additions is deeper integration with Google's ecosystem. Galaxy XR users can explore destinations through Google Maps' Immersive View, receiving AI-powered recommendations and contextual information from Gemini while navigating virtual environments. Furthermore, entertainment experiences have also expanded; users can watch 180-degree and 360-degree videos on YouTube, browse spatial content converted into 3D, and ask Gemini questions about on-screen content without interrupting playback. Samsung is also highlighting mixed-reality features such as Circle to Search, which allows users to identify real-world objects through hand gestures while using the headset's video pass-through mode. Another feature automatically converts photos and videos into spatial 3D experiences. Moreover, the headset now also supports Android Enterprise, allowing organisations to manage deployments using existing Android management tools. Annika Bizon, Vice President, Product and Marketing, Mobile Experience, Samsung UK & Ireland, talked about the device, stating: The headset is powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon XR2+ Gen 2 platform and features dual 4K Micro-OLED displays. The tech giant says that users can expect up to 2.5 hours of battery life. Samsung also confirmed that Galaxy XR will continue receiving software and security updates as the company works alongside Google and Qualcomm to expand the Android XR ecosystem. Galaxy XR is now available for pre-order and will go on sale on 8 July. Customers interested in trying the headset before launch can visit Samsung KX in London and selected Samsung Experience Stores from 17 June. Finally, the company will also host a livestream on 19 June showcasing the headset's capabilities and answering questions from prospective customers.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      95
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!