GTA IV in development for PC

[alphaomegainfinity]

What, you mean Hot Coffee :whistle: ?

Scirwode

Hot Coffee was never a GTA mod .It was Patrick W of the GTAForums.com who only changed a single integer value to reveal Rockstar's hidden content in GTA San Andreas. The scenes can be acessed by using Patrick W's sacensor.exe which actually flips the censor status of the game. The so called sex scenes have cut scenes,subtitles and even use of controls to play it as a sex simulator. If you can remember, the censored game will only show the cars outside without CJ and the camera view rocking and moaning sounds emanating from inside the girlfriends' houses. All the scenes were created by Rockstar themselves and they were just bitch lazy to remove them.

The modding community still hasn't forgiven Rockstar when it blamed them for creating something out of nothing. When Rstar faced the heat ,they behaved like hypocrite pussies with tails between their legs. This so called hidden content can only be accessed on GTA SA v1. Rstar removed it from the later versions. So don't say that the modders created it. it was singularly the creation of Rockstar who didn't have the guts to speak out the truth when it mattered the most.

[The Teej]

ROFL @ the scam. That was awesome. Glad to see GTA IV getting a PC release.

[+longgonebn Subscriber²]

all I can say is wooot!

[theyarecomingforyou]

I just hope it will be released simultaneously on Steam, as I've already bought the rest of the series on it. I am most looking forward to GTA4 for PC.

[+Anarkii Subscriber²]

Although its great news that a PC version of the game is coming out, I do think Rockscammer could of edited out poor Richard's and Anthonys names from the original postings. These poor saps will probably loose their jobs at the confession of such leaked info, inadvertitly breaking their NDC.

Great news about the game, quite possibly horrible news for those two guys :(

[Japlabot]

Is GTA4 in development for PC? Of course it is! Rockstar are not stupid.

But is this letter any evidence of such development? No way, it sounds like it was sent by some idiot Tech Support guy who can barely speak English. It is not phrased well or sound professional. If it was professional, they wouldn't have put in that it's "still in development" would they? And how would a Support person know the development process of a title?