'Friends' movie within next 18 months?


Recommended Posts

A big screen adaptation of US sitcom Friends is reportedly being lined up for release within the next 18 months.

According to the Daily Mail, the spinoff has been inspired by the success of the Sex And The City movie.

Jennifer Aniston, Courteney Cox, Matthew Perry, Matt LeBlanc, David Schwimmer and Lisa Kudrow are all apparently keen to reprise their roles in the film.

My Source: digital spy

Their Source: Daily Mail

  • Could this work?
  • Are Ross & Rachel on another break?
  • What happened to Joey since his TV show ended?
  • Do the kids have Chandler's sense of humour or Monica's OCD?
  • Did Phoebe ever learn how to play guitar properly?
  • Have the gang aged too much?

In Pictures: 'Friends' then and now

(Great picture of Matt Leblanc - he may need some hair dye to reprise the role...)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/646761-friends-movie-within-next-18-months/
Share on other sites

If this is true, then woohoo! I can't wait! Love Friends, I still watch the repeats on E4! :laugh:

They all look fine in those pictures, but Matt and Lisa have definately aged A LOT! Still, nothing a little make up won't fix! :p

Not going to happen. Not with the original cast anyway. Does anyone remember why the show got canceled in the first place? The actors wanted a huge amount of money per episode. The budget for this film would have to be like $500 million just to get the original cast :laugh:

I would love it, but I will only believe it when WB officially announces it. Schwimmer didn't seem too keen on the idea when he was on The View about a week or so before Sex and the City came out.

As for the others,

Courtney Cox's series just got canned

Matt LeBlanc had pretty much been M.I.A. since Joey was canned

Lisa Kudrow & Matthew Perry have neither moved on to anything huge either

David Schwimmer seems more content on directing now

Jennifer Aniston hasn't really had any huge movies but it major tabloid fodder

Most if not all were happy with the way the show ended and don't wanna wreck it. I really couldn't see a movie being worthwhile story wise unless they do a death of one of the friends, but there are quite a few movies about a group of friends getting together after one dies, so I dunno if that would be very original.

I think they should leave it as is.

FYI, they reason they ended the show, is because a few of the cast members (especially Cox & Aniston) wanted to start their families and spend some time doing that, and they all agreed as a group they didn't want to continue the show without some of the friends.

Slightly off-topic, but I must have been the only person who never was a fan of the series.

Believe me, you were not. I have tried so many times to watch it and discover what made it so popular. To this date (and despite the endless loop of repeats) I have yet to discover what it was.

It always struck me as typical American drivvle, that, as is often the case with American programmes, went on for far too long, carried along by its own sense of greatness. It's the same with House, CSI, etc. etc. They always do it. Sometimes, you just need to stop things before you do them to death.

Believe me, you were not. I have tried so many times to watch it and discover what made it so popular. To this date (and despite the endless loop of repeats) I have yet to discover what it was.

It always struck me as typical American drivvle, that, as is often the case with American programmes, went on for far too long, carried along by its own sense of greatness. It's the same with House, CSI, etc. etc. They always do it. Sometimes, you just need to stop things before you do them to death.

CSI I can understand because they've had 8, 9 seasons, but House? There's only been three seasons of House and it is still great. A critical hit.

There's no point in canceling these shows though as long as they're popular. Studios and networks are in the business of making money, you guys do realize this right? As long as they're making money on the show, why cancel it?

I just never "got" friends. A bunch of people generally whining, moping and making drama's out of small things. They never seemed to have any real stress in their lives, but seem to always have things to bring them down. And a never ending source of funds.

The one where? The one where I was usually out having a social life rather than religiously following 10 years of dross!

CSI I can understand because they've had 8, 9 seasons, but House? There's only been three seasons of House and it is still great. A critical hit.

There's no point in canceling these shows though as long as they're popular. Studios and networks are in the business of making money, you guys do realize this right? As long as they're making money on the show, why cancel it?

I think it a British thing, we have tv episodes which are normalyl either 30mins or 1hr without ads a lot of the time, whereas you guys have 20mins and 40 mins shows in 30 mins and 1hr slots respectively. A series (season) for use is normally 6-8 episodes whereas the US market tends to have anything between 12-24 episodes per season. the UK never has mid season breaks neither.

CSI I can understand because they've had 8, 9 seasons, but House? There's only been three seasons of House and it is still great. A critical hit.
I suffer the same issue with House as I do with all other similar things from the US. It's just rinse and repeat each week, to the point where it becomes pointless watching it.

In this latest UK series, they had a really great chance to freshen the mix, but instead, they didn't have the balls, and kept the original characters on the sidelines, just in case. That showed me that they didn't have enough confidence in the stories. And please, must someone suggest Lupus each and every week? It's become a standing joke in our house as we watch it.

Don't get me wrong, it's still capable of raising a laugh from me now and again, but whereas I would once never miss it for anything, these days I have a "If I catch it, great, if not, I can guess what happens" attitude. But alas, I've steered completely from the original topic. The only people who would really benefit from a Friends movie are the Friends cast who, as far as I can see, have been largely unsuccessful since it ended. Can't think why... :)

P.S. Goldgunner has hit the nail on the head in the above post. He's dead right. It just doesn't work as well in the UK.

If they don't rush it and it has a very good script then it will be a huge success.

For example, Matt Le Blanc's spin-off series Joey was pants because it was rushed out as soon as Friends ended. Fraiser on the other hand was great as a spin-off to Cheers.

I never really liked the show. Not that I hated it either. It was just kind of there. What I did like was that the actors never let individual egos get in the way. They all negotiated together and got paid equally and even made sure the rest of the staff got paid well. That is pretty rare anymore. If they want to do a movie I'm sure it would be profitable. I probably won't pay to watch it, but more power to them. Those guys and gals probably deserve their success more than most.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like no official TBW rating, which should be a required listing in my opinion for sites like Amazon (hell, put it on the box too.)
    • I think I understood the article fine. Online password managers open users up to more possibilities of getting hacked, and due to KeePass being offline and local it reduces the idea of getting hacked. If someone chooses to put their database online they're kinda missing the point. With regards to the idea of the on-prem idea, I would have two issues. I'm not sure about the first issue, but I wouldn't be surprised about them offering a cloud storage for the passwords that most wouldn't bother to switch off, regardless of if they went for on-prem or not. The second issue is that the on-prem solution for Bitwarden costs money, whereas KeePass is free and open-source (as far as I am aware). The article points out how to sync the database between devices, and I recognise that deficiency in security. But it isn't a necessity. So both services can offer a same idea, but one is free and the other isn't...choices, choices.... But to each their own.
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.2 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.2 changelog: Added New Twilight theme (#1292) Optional download completion notifications on Android (#1290) Fixed Fixed a crash on some older CPUs on Windows Fixed oversized system tray icon on macOS Improved Updated translations Prevented Android devices from sleeping while downloads are active (#1291) Various UI and UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.2 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I am not surprised because life is the product of a lot of biochemical and physical processes that releases various energies as a by-product. The only thing new here is the detection of these photon emissions. The researches noted this "glow" is not a metaphysical one. They don't even immediately end when one is dead. Things like fires, light bulbs, and on a bigger scale stars release a lot more "light" and they are hardly alive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!