Day of Defeat: Source Free Weekend


Recommended Posts

It's just called "Source" or "Source 2007" by Valve, calling it "the orange box engine" is just a user thing.

The engine update came with the Orange Box (Single Player code with EP2 and Portal, multiplayer code with TF2), so that's how it got it's name.

Actually, if you look at the SDK, it is listed as the "Orange Box Engine".

Hmm, haven't played DOD:S in forever. Might have to play a bit this weekend (already own it, and have for nearly 2 years now).

For those who haven't played it or are on the fence... BUY it! It's a fantastic game and really not all that difficult to get into (I'd say an hour or so and you'll have the hang of all the weapons).

Its quite unique. You can't bunny hop, in fact jumping is detrimental as it eats your stamina bar so you have less to sprint with (although it replenishes) and you can't jump very high anyway. The guns also have a more realistic recoil and cone of fire meaning there is a little bit of a learning curve to master the various guns in DoD. Laying prone and kneeling improves accuracy but leaves you vulnerable obviously because you are still. Sniping is also more realistic and your scope vision sways and sways more if you stand. I think its one of the more difficult games to really master but once you get decent enough its a very rewarding game. I have been playing it since launch and I love it.

You mean like how you can't miss if you're zoomed in?

It's a bit of a joke that your accuracy is 100% if you're zoomed in. It lands exactly where the crosshair was.

And how the SMGs can't hit what so ever. Bullets fly off at right angles with those things.

It's a good game though. I wasn't really able to get into it much since my FPS would be so low on my old PC, it would be pretty hard to play.

Grenades are freaking hilarious though. It's so good getting a multi-kill with a nade :laugh:.

I tried the game out with an open mind yesterday for about 30 minutes, and I absolutely hated it.

IMO, TF2 is far superior in every way.

What I did not like:

1.) I could not find any instant spawn servers (I despise spawn delays)

2.) I hated the maps. On just about all the maps I played, there is this one section where it's basically a dead-man's zone. I found almost no areas where you can sneak around to.

3.) I did not like the class restrictions that most servers had.

4.) I found the game to be buggy. There were quite a few instances where the game would just pause. I wouldn't be lagging, and I don't have this issue at all with TF2 or any of the other games in The Orange Box. Unfortunately, this would occur near a lot of battle scenes.

There were other small gameplay things I didn't like about it either.

That is just my $0.02.

I think the guys at Valve sit around and have a few beer and laughs and throw together scrapped games laying around to serve up for free weekends to make a few million. Good way to pad their retirements. Seriously I have allot of respect for Valve and their developement teams. Top of the line group. Can I play this in single player version (off line) or am I forced to go online and get my *** waxed every 10 seconds. Thanks for the free weekend.

haha call me old school but Day of Defeat Source is basically all I play OL, I didn't like TF2, got sick of BF2, CoD4 sux0rs imo etc...DoD is where the real gameplay is at...that said I am not a big fan of some of the changes...

-kill cam needs to go back to tf2 and stay there

-rocket is too noobed out now

-side arms are too accurate

I could live with the side arms and semi's being more accurate, if it brings in more players then cool. But the kill cam just destroys any sense of immersion and totally adds to the anger when your fragged.

Wow. I played DoD:S again for the tenth time just to get into it and I finally did. I used to hate the game with a passion but now I love it. I don't know what to say but it's so good now. Try it again if you already dislike the game. (Y)

The 5$ offer is available until the 10th of July. Hopefully my debit card will arrive by that time. :unsure:

Duno if they offer them where you do, but could you pick up one of those pre paid visa cards you can get. Pretty sure I've seen them at seven Eleven stores here for various amounts.

Something like the bellow this

Might be worth a look if you cant get the card within the time period.

haha call me old school but Day of Defeat Source is basically all I play OL, I didn't like TF2, got sick of BF2, CoD4 sux0rs imo etc...DoD is where the real gameplay is at...that said I am not a big fan of some of the changes...

-kill cam needs to go back to tf2 and stay there

-rocket is too noobed out now

-side arms are too accurate

I could live with the side arms and semi's being more accurate, if it brings in more players then cool. But the kill cam just destroys any sense of immersion and totally adds to the anger when your fragged.

I personally hate how inaccurate the sub machineguns are. It's ridiculous. I thought the rocket was fairly challenging to use at times, but sometimes it is easy.

The more I play DoD: S, the more I like it. I like it more than CS: S... never got into that game... but not as much as TF2 at all. Some of the maps are just boring, but many are pretty fun.

I don't like how there's no medic class or anything, because then as soon as you get into red you might as well charge mindlessly.

I personally hate how inaccurate the sub machineguns are. It's ridiculous. I thought the rocket was fairly challenging to use at times, but sometimes it is easy.

The more I play DoD: S, the more I like it. I like it more than CS: S... never got into that game... but not as much as TF2 at all. Some of the maps are just boring, but many are pretty fun.

I don't like how there's no medic class or anything, because then as soon as you get into red you might as well charge mindlessly.

Usually though, if you get hit; you go down in that hit.

And this is why I think the sniper is too accurate. You can kill people way before they've been able to aim at you, since all you have to do is pre-aim. Plus, with quick switching and quick scoping you can reel off shots so fast. It's fun to go on rampages with the sniper, makes people rage so much.

(To counter a sniper, unfortunately, you have to take up the SMG class so you can set up a load of smoke grenades. It's hard to shoot what you can't see.)

Usually though, if you get hit; you go down in that hit.

And this is why I think the sniper is too accurate. You can kill people way before they've been able to aim at you, since all you have to do is pre-aim. Plus, with quick switching and quick scoping you can reel off shots so fast. It's fun to go on rampages with the sniper, makes people rage so much.

(To counter a sniper, unfortunately, you have to take up the SMG class so you can set up a load of smoke grenades. It's hard to shoot what you can't see.)

Ain't that how snipers are supposed to be?

This game is definitely worth $5 :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!