GTX 280/260 price drop has already started


Recommended Posts

Online retailer Newegg has already dropped the prices of some of its Geforce GTX 280 and 260 card and the price drop is a lot more than expected. Asus and MSI GTX 280 cards are already listed for as little as US$499.99 (?318/?252), but as if that wasn't good enough, Asus is offering a $30 mail-in rebate and MSI is offering a $40 one.

This means that you can get the MSI card for as little as US$459 (?293/?232) which is really going to put some pressure on AMD. Cards from other manufacturers seem to be selling for anything between $519 and $729.99, so the price cut hasn't taken effect across the board as yet.

GTX 260 cards haven't dropped quite as much in price, but you can pick up an MSI card for $299.99 (?191/?151) which is still a very good deal, although most of the other cards listed are selling for between $329.99 and $429.99.

Hopefully this price drop will follow suite across the pond in Europe as well, but time will tell if there'll be as much of a price cut outside of the US.

Fudzilla

This is just crazy news. What a price drop! It also looks like my 9800 GX2 I was interested in purchasing has come back down to its normal price again. The past couple of weeks it was at $429 and then on Monday of this week its price went up to $500! For whatever reason its back to normal now.

Don't you love competition?

I am planning to ride out my 8800GTS 640MB until the next round of cards.... unless the current gen gets down to ~$250.00 and can beat my GTS by 10-15fps in COD4.

Are you sure you want to use COD 4 to test? That game is usually the benchmark game in which most cards spank regardless if they are high range or mid range.

Unless that is really all you play, I guess ignore my above comment. :p

well this is going to upset all of Nvidia's partners BFG, XFX, (AIB) and they better get a 55nm chip out soon. The larger the chip the less they will get out of each wafer and dropping the price decreases margins...after the news yesterday about faulty mobile chips causing a huge drop in profits and a 31% drop in stock price this isn't looking good.

For so long Nvidia has held strong but the AMD - ATI merger is looking better and Intel's Larrabee will be interesting...

I have only had Nvidia GPUs but this is bad news as a business for them.

I am planning to ride out my 8800GTS 640MB until the next round of cards.... unless the current gen gets down to ~$250.00 and can beat my GTS by 10-15fps in COD4.

Umm, just thought I would let you know that the Radeon HD 4850 at $199 already does beat the GeForce 8800 GTS (640MB) by about 10-15 frames-per-second in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. (In the graph below, I'm comparing the Radeon HD 4850 to the GeForce 8800 GT as it performs closest to your card.)

cod4.jpg

But I still agree with Mystic that you shouldn't buy a card just for one game. Not that the Radeon HD 4850 wouldn't be a good buy based on its overall performance.

I went from an 8800GT to a 4870, and do not regret it. The 8800 is fast, but it lagged a bit at 1680x1050. I heavily play COD 4 and Crysis. UT3 sometimes, but that game was already quick! The AA performance of the 4870 compared to the 8800 is insane.

Unfortunately, both ATI's and NVIDIA's cards are super power hungry this generation.

Of course, I don't see a point in upgrading from my 8800GT until a couple more generations of graphics cards (I say a couple because the past few generations have all been released within 3 months or so of one another), or until a game I want to play is actually released that stretches my card to its limits. As it is, even Crysis runs just fine enough for me at my admittedly low resolution of 1280x1024. Of course, I won't be buying a new monitor anytime soon since this one is just fine enough for me.

Edit: Also, I'd be super ****ed if I had just bought a 280. It's worse than the iphone price drop, and yet people aren't getting their money back like they did with the iphone.

Edited by Kupo-Cheer
Edit: Also, I'd be super ****ed if I had just bought a 280. It's worse than the iphone price drop, and yet people aren't getting their money back like they did with the iphone.

They should technically have the 280 priced near the 9800 GX2 because of how similarly they perform or even cheaper because the 9800 GX2 out performs the 280 most of the time.

I went from an 8800GT to a 4870, and do not regret it. The 8800 is fast, but it lagged a bit at 1680x1050. I heavily play COD 4 and Crysis. UT3 sometimes, but that game was already quick! The AA performance of the 4870 compared to the 8800 is insane.

ATI thankfully went back to hardware-processed anti-aliasing through the ROPs with the RV770. If you can remember, the R580 (Radeon X1950 series) through the good old R300 (Radeon 9700 Pro) were all renowned for their amazing AA quality and performance. ATI not only had better performance with AA than NVIDIA, but their quality was also greater (due to ATI's rotated grid method versus NVIDIA's ordered grid; NVIDIA switched to a rotated grid starting with the GeForce 7-series). However, with R600, ATI decided to go with shader-processed anti-aliasing, meaning that the stream processors were responsible for handling AA duties. This is why all Radeon HD 2000 and 3000 series cards suffer such a huge performance drop once you enable AA. Now though ATI once again has the advantage in AA performance, especially if you compare the 8x mode (where the Radeon HD 4870 can crush even the GeForce GTX 280).

Unfortunately, both ATI's and NVIDIA's cards are super power hungry this generation.

Of course, I don't see a point in upgrading from my 8800GT until a couple more generations of graphics cards (I say a couple because the past few generations have all been released within 3 months or so of one another), or until a game I want to play is actually released that stretches my card to its limits. As it is, even Crysis runs just fine enough for me at my admittedly low resolution of 1280x1024. Of course, I won't be buying a new monitor anytime soon since this one is just fine enough for me.

Edit: Also, I'd be super ****ed if I had just bought a 280. It's worse than the iphone price drop, and yet people aren't getting their money back like they did with the iphone.

Yeah, I would not be a happy campy if I had just dropped $649 on a GeForce GTX 280 a couple weeks ago, only to find it now selling for $499 (plus a $40 mail-in-rebate if you get the MSI version).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!