• 0

Blog re-design critique wanted!


Question

Hi guys,

Now that I'm no longer on a secure network I figured I can finally update my blog more often! So figured I'd re-design it.

A live example can be viewed here!

preview.png

The fonts used aren't that wide spread, and if lots of people mention it - i might try and get it all to be rendered with sIFR :)

As mentioned in the title comments and critique are always appreciated!

Cheers,

MI6Labs.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/647245-blog-re-design-critique-wanted/
Share on other sites

13 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

The design over all is nice :). I would take the time to read your blogs.

However it could be just my eyes but the white text in the dark background hurts my eyes after few minutes of reading italian :p.

You could wrap the contents with a white rectangle, and change the text color to black.

It's nice, I like it.

  • 0

With images disabled your visitors will be lost. Try to keep the navigation alive with images turned off. You can accomplish the rollovers without js. CSS will do that just as well. Navigation should be the last aspect to fall apart on a site. With js disabled your navigation will fail.

  • 0

Your alt attributes are better suited as title attributes (and put the text in the image into the alt tag, if somebody with images disabled comes to your site, the logo that says "fieldjournal" changes into "Funk Yeah!", Which isn't that helpful, and doesn't help search engines)

  • 0

Looks better, but now the menu is even worse (for image disabled users, they won't see anything)

And instead of having 2 separate images for each menu item (the first time you hover over a menu item it vanishes), put both states into the same image, and then move the image around on hover (you could put all the buttons into a single image and do the same thing)

  • 0
However it could be just my eyes but the white text in the dark background hurts my eyes after few minutes of reading italian :p.
What language is this?

It's filler text so you can visualize how it would look with content in it. Surprised more people don't know that! :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!