• 0

unRARing files fails at random


Question

Followup thread: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=649378

Say I have the following archive files:

file.r00

file.r01

file.r02

file.r03

If I try and unRAR them, it will fail at random, citing corrupted files. It may happen on r01, it might happen on r02, etc. It's completely random.

The same set of files will successfully unRAR without errors at times. Totally random!

Vista Business 32-bit

WinRAR 3.71

Please help, this is bloody annoying, and disconcerting.

Edited by Turbonium
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/647582-unraring-files-fails-at-random/
Share on other sites

18 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If possible, you should try to test the files on a different machine to make sure nothing is wrong with them. Judging from the fact that they successfully decompressed at least once, the files themselves are probably fine though. If the same thing happens on another box,, then you know something's not right with the files.

Aside from that, my first guess would be that your RAM may be dying. I have had similar problems when I pushed an overclock a bit too far. You can test your RAM with Memtest+ I'd let it run overnight if possible, but if you want to test right away let it do at least a full pass or two. It's been my experience that if memory fails in Memtest it fails pretty early on. I know this is not always the case, though.

That's all I can think of off the top of my head. I am sure someone else can provide additional insight.

Hope this helps!

  • 0
  Turbonium said:
Tested memory and it's fine.

Did SCANDISK and it's fine.

Files unRARed without issue on another machine.

Just tried it again on the problem machine, and it magically worked.

Truly random.

bump

Anyone have any clue? I just tried unRARing the same file again and it failed at 66%

It unRARed without issues two days ago.

I'd be asking this on a WinRAR forum, but I can't find an official one.

  • 0
  dt said:
Try using 7zip and see what happens.

Tried it, didn't work either.

What's peculiar is that it is not failing at the same location everytime (which is different than last time)... around 2% on both WinRAR and 7Zip.

The RAR files are currently stored on an external drive by the way. It seems like every time I move it or something, it behaves differently. It was unpackaging just fine a few hours ago!

And this is where it gets REALLY weird:

I've been trying to figure out the source of random crashes I've been getting for months now (BSODs, sometimes accompanied by automated scandisks). As part of my Debugging Tools install, I downloaded a Windows Symbol Package from here: http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/DevTools/Deb.../symbolpkg.mspx

When I tried to unpackage the CAB files (self-extracting), it would always complain about corrupt files about halfway through. I tried extracting it with WinRAR, and same error, also at 50%. I tried it with 7Zip and it worked!

This is so weird, I really don't know what the problem is. It's like my entire system can't unpackage anything reliably, regardless of the files, or the source drive, or the application being used.

EDIT:

Alright, so I just tried unRARing the original problem files again, and they're working magically, when literally 10 seconds ago they weren't!

And just to clarify: this sort of thing happens with ANY sort of archive file being extracted with this system. RARs, ZIPs, and self-extracting files, with either winRAR or 7Zip, and on any hard drive, internal or external.

The issue is not the files themselves.

  • 0

I ran some more Vista memory tests (5 passes Extended), and it still came out clean.

Attempted to unpackage some CAB files and it would always report corrupt files. I tried doing yet another SCANDISK and retried extracting the CAB files and it worked.

Everything seems to point towards a bad file system. The Event Viewer shows 17 Ntfs errors within the last 2 months:

"The file system structure on the disk is corrupt and unusable. Please run the chkdsk utility on the volume OS."

(I only found out about these by actually opening the Event Viewer - it never really gave me a warning on screen)

Furthermore, using dumpchk.exe, some (though not all) of my BSOD minidumps report the following:

"Probably caused by : Ntfs.sys ( Ntfs!NtfsPagingFileIo+138 )"

I accessed my disk's SMART data and everything is operationally sound.

What do you guys think? I've ran SCANDISK probably 6 times in the past 2 months, with half the time it being forced by the OS on a BSOD reboot.

Is it a physical fault with the disk? Corrupted MFT? Corrupt OS install? Something else maybe?

Edited by Turbonium
  • 0

For what it's worth, here are HD Tach Extended Test results (ran in XP SP2 compatibility mode):

slow.jpg

Seems hella slow to me, though it may just be a result of running compatibility mode, or the fact that I've been adding/deleting GBs of files over the past day without a defrag (current freespace on disk is ~13GB, was <1GB about 24 hours ago before I moved some files over to an external).

EDIT: My bad, but perhaps notebook HDDs are supposed to be this slow. If so, disregard the HD Tach info. Was just trying to use it as evidence for a potentially failing HDD.

  • 0
  kryten said:
I didn't read if you were overclocking anything. If you are overclocking anything, knock it off!!! Today's hardware is just fine at stock speeds. If not, then, well...we'll have to look elsewhere.

I don't overclock, and if I did, I would have enough sense to set it back to default before I come here to waste your time. ;)

  • 0
  kryten said:
I didn't read if you were overclocking anything. If you are overclocking anything, knock it off!!! Today's hardware is just fine at stock speeds. If not, then, well...we'll have to look elsewhere.

today's hardware is just fine with overclocked speeds. there's no reason to "knock it off"

@Turbonium - do you get these issues in safe mode? and have you tried the windows repair disc to see if it can detect anything wrong with your installation?

  • 0
  PermaSt0ne said:
@Turbonium - do you get these issues in safe mode? and have you tried the windows repair disc to see if it can detect anything wrong with your installation?

I haven't tried Safe Mode, nor the repair option.

You might want to check this out though everyone, as there's been an interesting development: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=649378

Edited by Turbonium
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All set as AI did the trick
    • AnyDesk 9.5.7 by Razvan Serea AnyDesk is a fast remote desktop system and enables users to access their data, images, videos and applications from anywhere and at any time, and also to share it with others. AnyDesk is the first remote desktop software that doesn't require you to think about what you can do. CAD, video editing or simply working comfortably with an office suite for hours are just a few examples. AnyDesk is designed for modern multi-core CPUs. Most of AnyDesk's image processing is done con­currently. This way, AnyDesk can utilize up to 90% of modern CPUs. AnyDesk works across multiple platforms and operating systems: Windows, Linux, Free BSD, Mac OS, iOS and Android. Just five megabytes - downloaded in a glimpse, sent via email, or fired up from your USB drive, AnyDesk will turn any desktop into your desktop in se­conds. No administrative privileges or installation needed. AnyDesk 9.5.7 changelog: Fixed Bugs Fixed deadlock when updating chat server Fixed crashes caused by exceptions in internal communication layer Fixed crash when opening new monitor in Session in a new window Fixed crash on shutdown Fixed bug that allowed naming Permission Profiles identical to predefined Profiles Fixed bug that could cause licensed remote clients to show up as free Fixed visual bug that caused Set-Password button to show up when Unattended Access was disabled Fixed bug that lead to selecting the wrong initial resolution for webcams New Features Added command line option --record-screen to start a Screen Recording Other Changes Improved visual consistency in some list views Download: AnyDesk 9.5.7 | macOS ~14.0 MB (Free for private use, paid upgrade available) Links: AnyDesk Home Page | Other platforms | Release History | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WUT?! Tell us you've never built desktop software without telling us you've never built desktop software... The chromium rendering engine is the content-rendering engine for "chromium-based browsers," but that does NOT mean there's a full-on UI underneath that is somehow bloating these products. The bloat is from the additional UI components that the browser vendor (Vivaldi) is adding atop the base package. Most chromium browsers customize the default skin/theme of the overall package so there's absolutely zero added overhead; it's really just a different CSS-based theme pack. Vivaldi, however, adds more than just a different skin; they add built-in extensions (that are managed by other built-in extensions), add other customization modules, and all kinds of other bloat -- and these add-ons are EXACTLY where the resource-hogging stems from. The mere fact it's a chromium-based browser has no impact on the matter. Lastly, power users literally DO notice resource-intensive applications -- they'll even be familiar with tools and widgets that expose those measurements the way only a power-user would! General consumers, however, would simply remark that their rig is sluggish and probably outdated and blindly upgrade to whatever the salespeople are hawking at the local computer store. General consumers wouldn't even upgrade their existing computer cuz they wouldn't know how to!
    • Nope, they just removed the game from sales.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Celilo earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      K.I.S.S. earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      solidox earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      solidox earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Devesh Beri earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      438
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      166
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      151
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      66
    5. 5
      macoman
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!