• 0

unRARing files fails at random


Question

Followup thread: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=649378

Say I have the following archive files:

file.r00

file.r01

file.r02

file.r03

If I try and unRAR them, it will fail at random, citing corrupted files. It may happen on r01, it might happen on r02, etc. It's completely random.

The same set of files will successfully unRAR without errors at times. Totally random!

Vista Business 32-bit

WinRAR 3.71

Please help, this is bloody annoying, and disconcerting.

Edited by Turbonium
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/647582-unraring-files-fails-at-random/
Share on other sites

18 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If possible, you should try to test the files on a different machine to make sure nothing is wrong with them. Judging from the fact that they successfully decompressed at least once, the files themselves are probably fine though. If the same thing happens on another box,, then you know something's not right with the files.

Aside from that, my first guess would be that your RAM may be dying. I have had similar problems when I pushed an overclock a bit too far. You can test your RAM with Memtest+ I'd let it run overnight if possible, but if you want to test right away let it do at least a full pass or two. It's been my experience that if memory fails in Memtest it fails pretty early on. I know this is not always the case, though.

That's all I can think of off the top of my head. I am sure someone else can provide additional insight.

Hope this helps!

  • 0
  Turbonium said:
Tested memory and it's fine.

Did SCANDISK and it's fine.

Files unRARed without issue on another machine.

Just tried it again on the problem machine, and it magically worked.

Truly random.

bump

Anyone have any clue? I just tried unRARing the same file again and it failed at 66%

It unRARed without issues two days ago.

I'd be asking this on a WinRAR forum, but I can't find an official one.

  • 0
  dt said:
Try using 7zip and see what happens.

Tried it, didn't work either.

What's peculiar is that it is not failing at the same location everytime (which is different than last time)... around 2% on both WinRAR and 7Zip.

The RAR files are currently stored on an external drive by the way. It seems like every time I move it or something, it behaves differently. It was unpackaging just fine a few hours ago!

And this is where it gets REALLY weird:

I've been trying to figure out the source of random crashes I've been getting for months now (BSODs, sometimes accompanied by automated scandisks). As part of my Debugging Tools install, I downloaded a Windows Symbol Package from here: http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/DevTools/Deb.../symbolpkg.mspx

When I tried to unpackage the CAB files (self-extracting), it would always complain about corrupt files about halfway through. I tried extracting it with WinRAR, and same error, also at 50%. I tried it with 7Zip and it worked!

This is so weird, I really don't know what the problem is. It's like my entire system can't unpackage anything reliably, regardless of the files, or the source drive, or the application being used.

EDIT:

Alright, so I just tried unRARing the original problem files again, and they're working magically, when literally 10 seconds ago they weren't!

And just to clarify: this sort of thing happens with ANY sort of archive file being extracted with this system. RARs, ZIPs, and self-extracting files, with either winRAR or 7Zip, and on any hard drive, internal or external.

The issue is not the files themselves.

  • 0

I ran some more Vista memory tests (5 passes Extended), and it still came out clean.

Attempted to unpackage some CAB files and it would always report corrupt files. I tried doing yet another SCANDISK and retried extracting the CAB files and it worked.

Everything seems to point towards a bad file system. The Event Viewer shows 17 Ntfs errors within the last 2 months:

"The file system structure on the disk is corrupt and unusable. Please run the chkdsk utility on the volume OS."

(I only found out about these by actually opening the Event Viewer - it never really gave me a warning on screen)

Furthermore, using dumpchk.exe, some (though not all) of my BSOD minidumps report the following:

"Probably caused by : Ntfs.sys ( Ntfs!NtfsPagingFileIo+138 )"

I accessed my disk's SMART data and everything is operationally sound.

What do you guys think? I've ran SCANDISK probably 6 times in the past 2 months, with half the time it being forced by the OS on a BSOD reboot.

Is it a physical fault with the disk? Corrupted MFT? Corrupt OS install? Something else maybe?

Edited by Turbonium
  • 0

For what it's worth, here are HD Tach Extended Test results (ran in XP SP2 compatibility mode):

slow.jpg

Seems hella slow to me, though it may just be a result of running compatibility mode, or the fact that I've been adding/deleting GBs of files over the past day without a defrag (current freespace on disk is ~13GB, was <1GB about 24 hours ago before I moved some files over to an external).

EDIT: My bad, but perhaps notebook HDDs are supposed to be this slow. If so, disregard the HD Tach info. Was just trying to use it as evidence for a potentially failing HDD.

  • 0
  kryten said:
I didn't read if you were overclocking anything. If you are overclocking anything, knock it off!!! Today's hardware is just fine at stock speeds. If not, then, well...we'll have to look elsewhere.

I don't overclock, and if I did, I would have enough sense to set it back to default before I come here to waste your time. ;)

  • 0
  kryten said:
I didn't read if you were overclocking anything. If you are overclocking anything, knock it off!!! Today's hardware is just fine at stock speeds. If not, then, well...we'll have to look elsewhere.

today's hardware is just fine with overclocked speeds. there's no reason to "knock it off"

@Turbonium - do you get these issues in safe mode? and have you tried the windows repair disc to see if it can detect anything wrong with your installation?

  • 0
  PermaSt0ne said:
@Turbonium - do you get these issues in safe mode? and have you tried the windows repair disc to see if it can detect anything wrong with your installation?

I haven't tried Safe Mode, nor the repair option.

You might want to check this out though everyone, as there's been an interesting development: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=649378

Edited by Turbonium
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not after SP1. There was a legitimate file copy issue prior.
    • Microsoft 365 security in the spotlight after Washington Post hack by Paul Hill The Washington Post has come under cyberattack which saw Microsoft email accounts of several journalists get compromised. The attack, which was discovered last Thursday, is believed to have been conducted by a foreign government due to the topics the journalists cover, including national security, economic policy, and China. Following the hack, the passwords on the affected accounts were reset to prevent access. The fact that a Microsoft work email account was potentially hacked strongly suggests The Washington Post utilizes Microsoft 365, which makes us question the security of Microsoft’s widely used enterprise services. Given that Microsoft 365 is very popular, it is a hot target for attackers. Microsoft's enterprise security offerings and challenges As the investigation into the cyberattack is still ongoing, just how attackers gained access to the accounts of the journalists is unknown, however, Microsoft 365 does have multiple layers of protection that ought to keep journalists safe. One of the security tools is Microsoft Defender for Office 365. If the hackers tried to gain access with malicious links, Defender provides protection against any malicious attachments, links, or email-based phishing attempts with the Advanced Threat Protection feature. Defender also helps to protect against malware that could be used to target journalists at The Washington Post. Another security measure in place is Entra ID which helps enterprises defend against identity-based attacks. Some key features of Entra ID include multi-factor authentication which protects accounts even if a password is compromised, and there are granular access policies that help to limit logins from outside certain locations, unknown devices, or limit which apps can be used. While Microsoft does offer plenty of security technologies with M365, hacks can still take place due to misconfiguration, user-error, or through the exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities. Essentially, it requires efforts from both Microsoft and the customer to maintain security. Lessons for organizations using Microsoft 365 The incident over at The Washington Post serves as a stark reminder that all organizations, not just news organizations, should audit and strengthen their security setups. Some of the most important security measures you can put in place include mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users, especially for privileged accounts; strong password rules such as using letters, numbers, and symbols; regular security awareness training; and installing any security updates in a timely manner. Many of the cyberattacks that we learn about from companies like Microsoft involve hackers taking advantage of the human in the equation, such as being tricked into sharing passwords or sharing sensitive information due to trickery on behalf of the hackers. This highlights that employee training is crucial in protecting systems and that Microsoft’s technologies, as advanced as they are, can’t mitigate all attacks 100 percent of the time.
    • Comments like these are genuinely fascinating to me because they're so far from anything I experience as a daily user of Win 11 since the first public beta. AI stuff? Have it turned off completely, never pops up anywhere. Forced MS account? Yes, they strongly recommend it and kinda push it lately during big updates and such, but it's still not forced. Pop up dialogs when you're not using Edge? Yeah, I vaguely remember seeing some reminders about using Edge a long time ago. I just clicked them away and kept using Vivaldi as usual (but frankly, I'd still much rather use Edge than Chrome - which I'm forced to use at work - I've grown to dislike Google a lot more than Microsoft lately, even if I am still deeply rooted in their ecosystem unfortunately). Awful context menus? A single simple tweak will get you the old context menus. Search in Windows using Bing? People use search in Windows for anything else than to search for local files or apps? Why? I just don't get a lot of the complains people have about Win 11.
    • Nice, but if you change the colour, the folder no longer shows image preview on the actual folder icon.
    • Taiwan hits Huawei and SMIC with new export restrictions by David Uzondu Taiwan has added Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, or SMIC, to its export control entity list. According to CNBC, this means companies in Taiwan now need a special license to ship certain high-tech goods to these two mainland Chinese firms. The conflict has been escalating for a while. The United States government, for instance, has been going after Huawei since at least 2019, putting the telecom equipment maker on its own Entity List over national security fears. The worry has always been about Huawei's connections to the Chinese government and the potential for its network gear to be used for spying. The United Kingdom eventually followed suit, ordering all Huawei 5G equipment to be ripped out of its networks by 2027. Remember, in December 2020, the US added SMIC to its Entity List over its alleged ties to the Chinese military. The goal was to choke off the chipmaker's access to the tools it needs to produce the most advanced semiconductors. Despite all the pressure, the two firms managed to collaborate and produce a 7nm chip for Huawei's Mate 60 phone, which annoyed some people in Washington who thought the sanctions had completely crippled China's chipmaking ambitions. This new blacklisting from Taiwan just tightens the screws even more. Last year, research firm TechInsights found a TSMC-made chip inside a Huawei AI training card. That was a huge "oh no" moment because it showed that, despite all the American restrictions, Huawei was still getting its hands on advanced Taiwanese silicon. That discovery led directly to the U.S. Commerce Department leaning on TSMC to shut down access for Chinese clients to specific AI chips. Huawei had cleverly exploited loopholes to hoard millions of GPU dies for its Ascend AI chip program, a direct attempt to build a homegrown alternative to Nvidia's dominant hardware. For Taiwan, this feels less like a trade issue and more like a matter of survival. The island's lead in chipmaking, largely thanks to TSMC, is often seen as its "silicon shield." The idea is that global reliance on Taiwanese chips makes any military action by China a huge risk for the world. Letting its most advanced tech reach the country that threatens its very existence could seriously weaken that shield. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      CSpera earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      MIR JOHNNY BLAZE earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Wireless wookie went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      617
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      277
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      179
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      150
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      115
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!