Crysis: Warhead to Sell for $29.99


Recommended Posts

Well as with other Crytek games in most cases you don't have to drive if you don't want to. Just get out and walk.

I walk mostly because I like seeing the scenery better. This game is going to kick ass.

Btw anyone know if there is much of a performance difference between DX10 and DX9 on the same system. I'm debating getting Vista for DX10.

Btw anyone know if there is much of a performance difference between DX10 and DX9 on the same system. I'm debating getting Vista for DX10.

perfromance is worse on DX10 because of the powered required to run all of it, yet you don't get very many benefits. this isn't a flaw with DX10 though, it's just shotty programing

I really hope performance is better. Upgrading to the 4870 has helped but there are still many occasions where the framerate noticeably drops - that's terrible for higher-end hardware released over half a year after a game that was already delayed for a year. Crytek simply made a bad judgement.

Yeah i walk because I prefer a some what less pronounced attack on a base. Rather sit back and do my thing that rush right in there.

Really? I like to launch my jeep over a rock jump out, watch it crush a building and then throw nades everywhere and blow **** up :laugh:

Wicked! I can't wait. I love playing Crysis, I have played through it at least 10 times now.I don't know why everyone is so harsh on it for being demanding, its not like we didn't know it was going to be ULTRA demanding. Its like it was when Doom3 came out and killed everybodies PC's. I like games like that, they push the technical envelope. Thats what PC gaming is all about. Besides Crysis on medium looks better than most games maxed out anyway.

Edited by bobbytomorow
Wicked! I can't wait. I love playing Crysis, I have played through it at least 10 times now.I don't know why everyone is so harsh on it for being demanding, its not like we didn't know it was going to be ULTRA demanding. Its like it was when Doom3 and killed everybodies PC's. I like games like that, they push the technical envelope. Thats what PC gaming is all about. Besides Crysis on medium looks better than most games maxed out anyway.

Me too! If it weren't for games like these, I might as well get an XBOX360 or PS3.

Shame it won't be ?15 here:((

Eh, sorry if this is a stupid question but will you need the original Crysis to play this? If not ill surely look into picking this up.

I believe it's a standalone game.

No this is a Standalone game from crysis this game takes place at the same time as crysis Warhead is set during the timeline of its predecessor. You play as Sergeant Michael Sykes, aka Psycho, the British-accented commando who goes off on a mission midway through Crysis only to reappear at the end,.

here is a link to info and facts about the game and the new enhanced engine all post snippets for those who wish to not read the entire article http://pc.ign.com/articles/884/884351p1.html

Dx10 performance in this will be far better as they have done alot of optimizing to the engine as they have stated and are using alot of new performance FREE new engine effects like global HDR ambient lighting new particle effects and also they have confirmed that in some many words that all the Dx10 stuff you seen in Crysis is now available to all Dx9 users

Yerli and the others see Warhead as sort of a relaunch for the Crysis franchise. For one, Crytek's programmers have spent the last year optimizing and tuning the engine to improve both performance and visuals. For example, Warhead will introduce a new particle system as well as a new global ambient lighting system that boosts the image quality "at almost no performance cost" according to Yerli. Some before-and-after shots show off the new level of detail now achievable, right down to being able to see the grain in a wood plank or pores in human skin. "This is being done in DirectX 9," Yerli noted, which is good news for those who haven't or are unwilling to upgrade to Windows Vista and DirectX 10. And that brings up Crytek's second point, which is that the rest of the PC ecosystem has matured quite a bit since Crysis shipped last year. Since then, Microsoft has released Service Pack 1 for Vista, which improved performance for 3D applications, and graphics hardware companies such as Nvidia have improved their driver support, which is critical for a game like Crysis.

There's also the fact that many gamers have upgraded their systems over the past year. The Crytek team wants to dispel the myth that Crysis or Warhead requires a high-end, expensive system to play. So they ran the Warhead demonstration on a $652 PC built with parts purchased online. Performance was astonishingly smooth and fluid even with a high level of graphical detail.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      456
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      117
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!