advantages of mac book over Vaio..?


Recommended Posts

i want to know that what are the advantages of buying apple mac book over sony vaio's which give windows vista pre-installed.

I want to know why should i consider a macbook over other laptops....?

If you're looking to use Windows Vista then why are you considering spending so much on a Macbook?

No really, what are you looking to use on a Macbook?

There is no "The MacBook is better because xxxxxxxx" explanation. Ultimately comes down to which one you prefer and which OS you prefer to use - Leopard or Vista! Go and try both and decide which you feel does the things that you want best!

i have used vista but didnt performed upto my expectations..

even xp and linux distros were good than vista..

one more question that what if i want to install linux with mac os?

willl i be able to that for my study purposes.. and what about warranty after i install linux...?

You can install linux on your mac without too much trouble. It won't affect your warranty at all.

What model of vaio are you looking at? I have been playing with a macbook and vaio sz for a while. The build quality is much better on the mac than the sony in my experience, things feel flimsy of the vaio and have broken off but the mac is untouched. The keyboard on the mac is also (for me at least) nicer to type on. The battery life on the macbook is also better but at the disadvantage of size/weight. The vaio does feel nice and light to carry around.

But like Chicane said, go and try them out, you'll know pretty quickly which is the one for you

I'd be brave enough to say that if you thought Vista was a let down but you like some distro's of Linux, you'll probably like MacOS X.

I'm an old Linux user (started back in the mid to late 90's) and whilst I admire it hugely and how far it has come, i've never really got on with it on my primary desktop simply for driver incompatibility and (on the whole) immature software. MacOS X is the ideal environment for me - pretty, with excellent hardware support and built on a UNIX core which means I can drop to a shell at any point and use commands i'm used to such as editors, network diagnostic tools (ping, etc etc), ssh/sftp client and so forth.

As I say - try em both out and see what grabs you :)

I'm an engineering student going on my 4th year soon. A Windows laptop is going to avoid a lot of pain in the future as your classes will require certain software that just won't work on a Mac unless you go out of your way. For engineering purposes a windows laptop is going to be your only option. I recommend a Dell as support is great and fast, in case you ever need it you will be happy. My Dell laptop is still functional for engineering purposes and now that I have moved off-campus I bought a desktop, which in the future you may do as well. At that point you can get a Mac :)

I'm an engineering student going on my 4th year soon. A Windows laptop is going to avoid a lot of pain in the future as your classes will require certain software that just won't work on a Mac unless you go out of your way. For engineering purposes a windows laptop is going to be your only option. I recommend a Dell as support is great and fast, in case you ever need it you will be happy. My Dell laptop is still functional for engineering purposes and now that I have moved off-campus I bought a desktop, which in the future you may do as well. At that point you can get a Mac :)

I know several engineering students here (georgia tech) with Macs. :whistle: We use a lot of Matlab--which is available on all three platforms.

for studies and laptop use, the macbook is easy and user friendly... Its great for the it just works side of things. I say that but lots of people i know try to use a macbook and they go back to a windows machine... I also know lots of friends says OMG so much easier on a mac.

It comes down to personal preference, and mine for a laptop is definitely Mac OS.

I know several engineering students here (georgia tech) with Macs. :whistle: We use a lot of Matlab--which is available on all three platforms.

we dont just use matlab...

as an engineering student, i've found that majority of cad software is either available on windows or unix. if you want to get a mac, you need to fork over a premium depending on what mac you get plus an additional $100-200 for windows to use with boot camp. engineering programs like CAD will require a good amount of resources, so using virtualization wouldn't be the best idea.

theres no real advantages of a macbook over a decent windows laptop other than os... and that just becomes a matter of preference.

we dont just use matlab...

as an engineering student, i've found that majority of cad software is either available on windows or unix. if you want to get a mac, you need to fork over a premium depending on what mac you get plus an additional $100-200 for windows to use with boot camp. engineering programs like CAD will require a good amount of resources, so using virtualization wouldn't be the best idea.

theres no real advantages of a macbook over a decent windows laptop other than os... and that just becomes a matter of preference.

Since when is a Macbook a premium? Especially with the included student deal going on with an iPod touch? Vista OEM is $100.

But you are right that cad is resource intensive and that a discrete video card is something you'd want which the Macbook doesn't offer.

Since when is a Macbook a premium? Especially with the included student deal going on with an iPod touch? Vista OEM is $100.

But you are right that cad is resource intensive and that a discrete video card is something you'd want which the Macbook doesn't offer.

well i consider something like the black macbook and the macbook pro a premium. the black macbook has an igp and costs $1500-1600 and if you want dedicated graphics you have to fork over $2000.

i cannot picture myself spending over $1500 on a laptop, let alone one that has an igp...

^^^ A Mac can easily be a "Windows laptop".

Yeah but if his just gonna use windows anyways, seem silly to get a mac THAN use windows when he can get a more bang-for-the-buck PC and use windows.

Get the Vaio, as an engineering student, getting a Mac will cause some headache mainly because of the lack of software.

well i consider something like the black macbook and the macbook pro a premium. the black macbook has an igp and costs $1500-1600 and if you want dedicated graphics you have to fork over $2000.

i cannot picture myself spending over $1500 on a laptop, let alone one that has an igp...

Blackbook is a rip--we all know that. I'd never fancy paying just for a paintjob. ;)

MBPs are a bit overpriced, but nothing out of the ordinary for what it offers to be honest. It's a very nice machine when you consider the entire package and design.

If you're an engineering student, check to see what software packages you'll need to be using. Many of them could be Windows only, and Parallels is a terrible option for some of the more processor intensive or 3D CAD apps, and I don't think anyone here can honestly say that they enjoy dual booting...

I mean, I've certainly used my fair share of Windows only stuff in various engineering classes: Xilinx's IDE for FPGA work, Any of Microchip's PIC compilers, AutoCAD, LASI, SolidWorks, various little apps a prof has thrown together for some lab, some silly toolsuite we used in a Physics lab for a DAQ, etc.

Also, If you have or can get a desktop too, I'd recommend a convertible tablet PC instead of a laptop. They're incredible for classes, and HP has the tx2500z, which is very nicely priced, especially as you can generally find a coupon for several hundred dollars off, bringing even it down to like $1200 even fully spec'd out.

Edit: Ok. Xilinx's ISE isn't Windows only. It can run on Linux, too. But not OSX.

Edited by MioTheGreat

If the required SW is only available for Windows, then there's really no point in a MB - most of the working time would be spent in Windows, and a Windows laptop can be had for less, and offer more features.

I don't know if I would go with a VAIO though either, Sony is about as expensive as Apple, but YMMV. My dad has one, and it's been reliable for him, he's had it for a couple years, and no problems. I like the new Dell Studio line, they look nice, and have good/money performance ratios.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!