advantages of mac book over Vaio..?


Recommended Posts

+1, for the amount of software available for Windows (Y)

Which certainly couldn't keep me in the Windows camp . . . ;)

That whole software availability thing is no longer a real advantage. There's a whole lot of junk out there, and it's growing by the minute.

But if we're talking some sort of specialized, windows-only, industry-specific software, i.,e. ACE, DRS, etc., then you'll need Windows. And you can install Windows on a Mac, no problem and just run that, wipe off OS X completely.

My brother has a MacBook - and all the software he needs is available on Mac, the only stuff that isn't available are titles you would never want to run on a laptop (be it Mac or PC); so he uses the quad core workstations with gigabytes of memory in the engineering computer labs.

As for a Sony Vaio; don't wast your money - get a Lenovo or one of the new Dell Studio laptops. Sony laptops are over priced, their BIOS's are as buggy as hell, and their machines are from top to bottom riddled with mountains of crapware.

Of all the things, Sony *face palm*

about 2 months ago my parents went for a trip in the USA. I told em to get me a blackbook, my brother got himself a Vaio SZ, and wer'e still arguing which is better. The thing is, it's down to OS. nothing else. Hardware is the same, except for the GPU, which is better on the Vaio.

about 2 months ago my parents went for a trip in the USA. I told em to get me a blackbook, my brother got himself a Vaio SZ, and wer'e still arguing which is better. The thing is, it's down to OS. nothing else. Hardware is the same, except for the GPU, which is better on the Vaio.

True, but not only the operating system, but how the whole thing works together. There is no use having the worlds fastest computer when the operating system is crap and poorly integrated with the hardware to the point that unreliable and painful to use.

I'm not sure where you're going to school, but something to consider is where you'll be doing a lot of your work. For example, I'll be an engineering student at the University of Illinois in the fall and I just bought a macbook pro. Whenever I need to use graphically intense engineering software, I'll be using the engineering labs. Depending on where you go to school and the facilities that they make available to their students, you could certainly go with the macbook for your personal surfing, email, and simple office stuff and use the computer labs for your engineering work. Also remember, the university (depending on size) is unlikely to give you free copies of the software you have to use because they just don't have enough licenses. If you decide not to use computer labs, you may end up spending lots of money just buying programs for your classes.

My brother has a MacBook - and all the software he needs is available on Mac, the only stuff that isn't available are titles you would never want to run on a laptop (be it Mac or PC); so he uses the quad core workstations with gigabytes of memory in the engineering computer labs.

As for a Sony Vaio; don't wast your money - get a Lenovo or one of the new Dell Studio laptops. Sony laptops are over priced, their BIOS's are as buggy as hell, and their machines are from top to bottom riddled with mountains of crapware.

Of all the things, Sony *face palm*

Crapware is a moot point since most everyone I know does a clean install, anyway.

Crapware is a moot point since most everyone I know does a clean install, anyway.

Well *mate* you're shyte out of luck in the case of Sony because you get crappy 'restore DVDs'.

IIRC Dell are one of the few who actually give you a proper Windows Vista DVD.

Which models are you looking at, we don't even know with Macbook or Sony he's looking at. You also have to buy according to price and performance. Also what programs would you be using in specific?

One thing about OS X is it's quite limited in software.

Which models are you looking at, we don't even know with Macbook or Sony he's looking at. You also have to buy according to price and performance. Also what programs would you be using in specific?

One thing about OS X is it's quite limited in software.

Limited based on WHOSE criteria?

Windows has alot of programmes - and alot of them are crap.

I knew someone was going to say that. lol

I won't get into your Mac vs. PC argument though.

Everyone knows there are 10 times the software on Windows.

Macs are great too, I hope to get one in the next year or so :)

I knew someone was going to say that. lol

I won't get into your Mac vs. PC argument though.

Everyone knows there are 10 times the software on Windows.

Macs are great too, I hope to get one in the next year or so :)

You never addressed the fact that it has 10 times as much software - and much of it completely crap. When you take out all the crap shareware and freeware garbage that exists, there is no more software available on Windows than there is on Mac.

You never addressed the fact that it has 10 times as much software - and much of it completely crap. When you take out all the crap shareware and freeware garbage that exists, there is no more software available on Windows than there is on Mac.

Somehow I doubt this.

One thing about OS X is it's quite limited in software.

Very few programs don't have OS X counterparts, and if you consider you can use Parallels Desktop for Mac to run Windows inside of OS X seamlessly, there is no limit to the software you can operate on your Mac. :)

Limited based on WHOSE criteria?

Windows has alot of programmes - and alot of them are crap.

Well, it might depend on a person's field though.

Before Apple switched to intel, OSX was basically a non-factor. When I did my BSc in electrical engineering, all I used were Windows and Solaris, Macs had absolutely no use to me. Back then, I would have to use AutoCAD from time to time, and now I use Visual Studio quite a bit, as well as Access. I can run Matlab and R on my Mac, but I can run them on Linux and Windows too, and well if I'm at one machine that can run everything, natively, it's usually difficult trying to justify looking for alternatives or running off to a Mac, just so I can say so.

On the other hand, there are apps on OSX, that either don't exist, or more difficult to use on Windows, and in that case, it makes more sense to use a Mac.

In the end, you have to use the tool that gets the job done, regardless of OS.

Well, it might depend on a person's field though.

Before Apple switched to intel, OSX was basically a non-factor. When I did my BSc in electrical engineering, all I used were Windows and Solaris, Macs had absolutely no use to me. Back then, I would have to use AutoCAD from time to time, and now I use Visual Studio quite a bit, as well as Access. I can run Matlab and R on my Mac, but I can run them on Linux and Windows too, and well if I'm at one machine that can run everything, natively, it's usually difficult trying to justify looking for alternatives or running off to a Mac, just so I can say so.

On the other hand, there are apps on OSX, that either don't exist, or more difficult to use on Windows, and in that case, it makes more sense to use a Mac.

In the end, you have to use the tool that gets the job done, regardless of OS.

True, but at the end of the day - what you're using it for, is a very niche situation. I'm sure these lazy companies will eventually start supporting Mac. Right now all the engineering lecturers at the university I go to use Macbooks.

True, but not only the operating system, but how the whole thing works together. There is no use having the worlds fastest computer when the operating system is crap and poorly integrated with the hardware to the point that unreliable and painful to use.

So its not the operating system...but it is the operating system? If the hardware is the same then the only difference is software, there is no "magic" inbetween that some people think macbooks have, they're just another laptop.

So its not the operating system...but it is the operating system? If the hardware is the same then the only difference is software, there is no "magic" inbetween that some people think macbooks have, they're just another laptop.

The magic is that Apple know what the hell they're righting their software to support - it isn't a random stab in the dark as to whether something works properly. They know that in 2007 they released a MacBook with a xyz specifications, they know that in 2008, the release a MacBook Pro with zyx specifications - therefore, they know what hardware bugs might exist within the cpu, within the supporting hardware - and how to work around them. They know what hardware comes with it by default or what possible variations exist if a custom order.

It reduces the scope of possible issues that could arise.

Engineering software can be very processor intensive. Also, would you like working on a 13.3" screen as opposed to a 15.4?

I would try to look at the higher end notebooks, such as the MacBook Pro (for a Mac) and other PC's that are equivalent in specs.

But really, it all depends on what you like.

The magic is that Apple know what the hell they're righting their software to support - it isn't a random stab in the dark as to whether something works properly. They know that in 2007 they released a MacBook with a xyz specifications, they know that in 2008, the release a MacBook Pro with zyx specifications - therefore, they know what hardware bugs might exist within the cpu, within the supporting hardware - and how to work around them. They know what hardware comes with it by default or what possible variations exist if a custom order.

It reduces the scope of possible issues that could arise.

Bugs within the cpu? What the hell :blink:

Bugs within the cpu? What the hell :blink:

Welcome to the world of CPU Erratas, and microcode patching which are delivered through BIOS/firmware updates.

http://www.intel.com/design/mobile/specupdt/314079.htm

AMD has their own erratas and microcode updates as well.

Some of the bugs are minor, like the TLB issue which was more a matter of needing to update the documentation. Others require updates.

Engineering software can be very processor intensive. Also, would you like working on a 13.3" screen as opposed to a 15.4?

I would try to look at the higher end notebooks, such as the MacBook Pro (for a Mac) and other PC's that are equivalent in specs.

But really, it all depends on what you like.

For something processor intensive, he is wasting his time with a notebook. Just use the university computers; heck, Canterbury University is hardly rich but they have quad core, multi gigabyte 20+ inch monitors for their engineering workstations. I'm sure the one he's going to will have computers even better.

Btw, you will be writing ALOT of reports. My brother has just finished a 10,000 - 65 page report.

Then again, in New Zealand they compress a course which normally is done in 5 years, down to 3 years. So you should be happy you're over there and not here :p

So its not the operating system...but it is the operating system? If the hardware is the same then the only difference is software, there is no "magic" inbetween that some people think macbooks have, they're just another laptop.

That's actually what he/she meant ;) The OS has to support the hardware, like drivers. You also need to test it on the hardware to make sure it works as it should and doesn't cause any problems that can cause the system to become (nearly) useless. The software needs to fit the hardware and when you're making your own hardware and software it's much easier to do so. Sony, Dell, etc. depend on Microsoft to some extend which makes things a bit harder. It's just some more overhead.

Software is not much of an issue with today's operating systems. They have an equal amount of software in grand total. The differences are in the niche software like CAD or networking or security software. Windows has a lot of software for CAD but not that much for networking & security when compared to Mac. Linux has an equal amount of software for networking & security as OS X (as most UNIX/UNIX-like systems have) but when you need to do some photo/video editing a Mac is a much better idea (more software with a lot more features). As said by many others, the amount of software for any OS really depends on what you're looking for/at. That's why you'll always have to make a list what software you'll be needing and base your OS decision on that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!