Why are all LCD monitors now widescreen?


Recommended Posts

I used to have a 15" 4:3 CRT, and once I got my two 20" widescreens, I never looked back. Sure, 4:3 displays are taller, but that's why there's scroll bars. :p Or you can just get a 30" and not worry about height - I can pull up code from projects I'm working on and not have to scroll at all. Plus there's room to run 3 different browsers for testing. :)

I love my 22" widescreen and wouldn't go back to a 4:3 / 5:4 monitor. It took a while to get used to websites but it didn't take long before it felt completely natural - it's only to be expected that change takes some getting used to. Widescreens are great for movies, gaming, creative work (Cubase, etc) and just seem more "right" (it's more natural to look along the horizontal plane than the vertical). I'd love to go for a 24" monitor or bigger but it's just too demanding for games, as I'd need at least two graphics cards to maintain an acceptable framerate. Two monitors are out of the question for desk space because I'd have nowhere to put my speakers.

Two monitors are out of the question for desk space because I'd have nowhere to put my speakers.

That I forgot to mention. Now that I have a widescreen monitor, there's not enough room for my speakers. So, i had to put them behind the monitor. If it were 4:3, there would've been plenty of room.

For coding, widescreen is terrible. You end up with less vertical space and a massive excess of horizontal space. I'd rather have a widescreen turned 90 degrees for coding, actually.

To each his own.

My older monitor can do 1280x1024 at the most, while my 24" does 1920x1200. I certainly have not lost any space in terms of vertical resolution, but TBH that's a bit comparing apples to oranges.

I find it to be the perfect size to have two code files loaded side-by-side in the IDE without ever having to scroll horizontally.

In fact, I liked it so much I got a second one (identical) for all my floating toolbars and other windows. I tried both monitors rotated vertically for a short while...The vertical space was nice, but I definitely prefer having the extra room for the other axis. Maybe if I had a third one... :-)

But that's the point. In 4:3 monitors, you can maximize the window and no white spaces are there. It's hard to believe that I'm the only person standing on this earth that prefers 4:3. There's a reason why the first monitors were 4:3. It's because they're better. But for some reason, today people got the idea that wider is better, when in reality, it's not. I don't mind them selling widescreen monitors, but at least sell 4:3 as well to give people some option.

As for Neowin being centered. I'll check that out when I get home. I'm not using my home computer at the moment. Right now, I using a nice 4:3 monitor.

You can get the same effect with a smaller wide screen monitor as well. Or, you can see that whitespace with a large 4:3 monitor.. that's just your screen size, you'll get used to it unless you try not to, in which case, you're screwed lol.

Maybe it's cheaper for them (technically less pixels per screen). I know Apple's reasoning is that the brain reads horizontally, so having windows open side by side makes more sense. Also DVDs look better.

I really find this to be a great answer. Makes perfect sence.. btw I love widescreen monitors.

WIDESCREENS FTW!! :p

Funny how everyone here loves them. Yet all my friends and relatives thought I was weird for getting one. Can't say I blame them but widescreen is all they sell now.

BTW- I'm at home now and Neowin is indeed centered. I hate it. On a 4:3 monitor, this site fills the entire screen

I regularly use this bookmarklet to resize my browser window for proper use:

java script:self.moveTo(0,0);self.resizeTo(1152,screen.availHeight);

Might be helpful to anyone else using a widescreen monitor.

[edit]WTF, why won't neowin allow me to say "javascript" as one word above?!?

In the past I've owned a 15" crt and 17" crt's.

In the last few years I've owned a 17" lcd w.s. and 19" lcd w.s

I now use 2 Dell 20" w.s.'s.

The Widescreens just feel more natual to me. Like currently I'm watching a movie on the one and on the other I have room for webpage and aim chat windows.

4:3's are not for me any more. I have one at work and hate it. I feel less productive on it.

When I went out to get a monitor I was looking for a standard full screen but was forced to get the widescreen because that's all the stores sell. I wasn't happy about it at first but I got used to it and would never go back, it just began to feel more natural and they are great for gaming.

Funny how everyone here loves them. Yet all my friends and relatives thought I was weird for getting one. Can't say I blame them but widescreen is all they sell now.

BTW- I'm at home now and Neowin is indeed centered. I hate it. On a 4:3 monitor, this site fills the entire screen

I love it when websites are centered.

Funny how everyone here loves them. Yet all my friends and relatives thought I was weird for getting one. Can't say I blame them but widescreen is all they sell now.

BTW- I'm at home now and Neowin is indeed centered. I hate it. On a 4:3 monitor, this site fills the entire screen

I am on a 4:3 monitor and it doesn't fill the whole screen - it's centered. Change your resolution, if it really bugs you that much, as that's the problem. It isn't necessarily the aspect ratio as much as the resolution you have it on is what's causing it to be centered.

Note: I'm running 1280x1024 on this monitor which causes it to be centered. A lower resolution yields the results you're looking for.

I still like CRT for FPS games, Quake3 at 2048x1536 @ 85Hz on a 24" CRT is awesome fun. If the refresh rates were higher on LCD's, I'd like them better for the old style fast action FPS. Of course, modern FPS games have a slower pace so maybe the Hz doesn't matter as much.

only a couple pixels really, I personally LOVE my 19' widescreen, my dad has a 4:3 19 inch and I hate it. I find widescreen better for gaming and there is more room to put apps/windows side by side which makes me more productive.

Widescreen is also MUCH better for movies.

Wow, a 19 foot widescreen!!!!11 Bet you that costs a pretty penny...

I'm still using my old Dell 4:3 19" LCD. Widescreens only advantage is when it comes to movie playback, where most things are shot in 16:9. Modern games support widescreen, also, but some of the older titles don't.

Fullscreen is better for just about anything else; mostly productivity software.

The main reason I'm sticking with my 4:3 is because I just can't fit a much larger widescreen on my computer desk. I've only got a few inches to work with, and if I fill them with a widescreen monitor, I'll basically have to use a smaller monitor anyway because the horizontal size will be inherently bigger. Even if I could fit a slightly larger widescreen here, the cost of getting another monitor that isn't *that* much different just isn't worth it.

Besides, my laptop is widescreen, and being only 1440x900 resolution, reading websites can be a pain in the A with the need to constantly scroll, yet I've got this huge horizontal space completely unused.

For coding, widescreen is terrible. You end up with less vertical space and a massive excess of horizontal space. I'd rather have a widescreen turned 90 degrees for coding, actually.

Put two pages side by side. Or open a window designer next to some code. Rethink your IDE layout. Widescreen opens up some really nice options.

I have a 24" monitor. Having it in 4:3 would not work as well, IMO.

But that's the point. In 4:3 monitors, you can maximize the window and no white spaces are there. It's hard to believe that I'm the only person standing on this earth that prefers 4:3. There's a reason why the first monitors were 4:3. It's because they're better. But for some reason, today people got the idea that wider is better, when in reality, it's not. I don't mind them selling widescreen monitors, but at least sell 4:3 as well to give people some option.

As for Neowin being centered. I'll check that out when I get home. I'm not using my home computer at the moment. Right now, I using a nice 4:3 monitor.

lmao, do you realize how foolish you sound?

"there's a reason why the first monitors were 4:3. It's because they're better"

You do realize that as time goes by technology gets better, right? 16:9 (or 16:10 in the case of most monitors) is the new standard. It's a simple fact. Get used to it.

You go around acting like your opinion is the only thing that matters. We get it. You love cheap, old technology. But you have to understand that millions of other people are willing to change with the times. Many more people obviously like widescreen or else nothing would have changed over. It's simply just technology progression.

Overall, wider is better. You can do many more things on the screen at once due to the aspect ratio. That's not my opinion, that's just a simple fact.

BTW- I'm at home now and Neowin is indeed centered. I hate it. On a 4:3 monitor, this site fills the entire screen

Are you also one of those people who see the black bars at the top/bottom of a widescreen movie on a 4:3 TV and think, "fill my screen, dammit!"

At least unlike movies, you can use the additional space for other things...

Actually the reason old screens where 4:3 had nothign to do with it being better, rather than easier. shorter "frames" in film rolls. the TV " tbe" doesn't have to be as long. Remember on a widescreen the depth of the tibe id determined bt the widest part of the TV. And peple didn't really have that much space.

As for productivity, no way 4:# is more productive, tr doing ANY spreadsheat of database work on a 4:3 as opposed to widescreen. For other pgorams the extras side space for tools is invaluable.

and yeah, our vision IS wider, not circular. I suppose it could be argued that each eye has a circular field of view, but you can disprove that with a simpe test, hoewver even if they where, we have two eyes, and they're not in the same space, this alone makes our field of view eliptical.

oh and even before LCD's at least one possibly two high end worksation monitor makers started making widescreen monitors for the business market.

Are you also one of those people who see the black bars at the top/bottom of a widescreen movie on a 4:3 TV and think, "fill my screen, dammit!"

At least unlike movies, you can use the additional space for other things...

in additoon Neowin is just as centered on a high res 4:3 screen.

I've had a 20inch wide monitor at home for the past 3 years, and i can't say anything more than i love it. I will never buy a non widescreen monitor again. We got widescreen monitors at work and now i'm just totally happy, i got wide at home/work now, no adjustment periods when i frst get into the office.

Once you go wide you'll never go back.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!