What do you want in an Operating System?


Recommended Posts

I think it was due before I was born.

Edit: Nope, most of the components were finished before I was born, kernel development started when I was 3.

And how old are you now? lol

It'll likely be done when I'm six feet under...

...

I don't think the APNG thing is anything do with Debian "being stupid". Mozilla patched libpng to support APNG but libpng won't include the patch in their build for some reason... and Debian won't patch libpng themselves... Of course there is nothing stopping you downloading the source for Iceweaseal and libpng, patching libpng yourself and building against the patched libpng... just a lot more hassle.

...

Mozilla bundle their own build of libpng, which is pre-patched (so you specifically have to remove APNG support), and even then the plain patches are available from bugzilla, like in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=418900 IceWeasel doesn't include it because it's not part of the PNG spec (which I think is pretty stupid, they don't patch out other non-standard stuff).

And how old are you now? lol

It'll likely be done when I'm six feet under...

Just turned 21.

Personally I'm still in the honeymoon phase with OS X and feel that it's the best I've used so far. This is my list, in no particular order:

1. The interface is clean, simple and fairly minimalist. I'm not a fan of fat window borders and buttons that look like balloons which is the impression Vista gave me. I also have no need for pretty colours, I just want something neutral and fairly pleasing to the eye.

2. It is intuitive and consistent. Things are where I expect them to be, you don't have to learn how to do or find things, they're just in a logical place (to me at least).

3. I like the Dock (OS X) and Quick Launch (in Windows) where I can have a select few icons for frequently used files/folders/applications. I hate having icons on the desktop which I tend to use as a temporary repository for downloaded/new files.

4. I want to be able to customise *everything* but I don't want to have to do so. That means I want it to install in a usable state, so I can customise at my leisure.

5. I really like the repository system used in many (all?) Linux distros where you can just find a big list of software that you can search & install.

6. I like the preview thing in Vista when you hover over programs in the task bar.

7. Obviously I want a secure and stable OS that makes the most of my hardware.

8. The virtual desktops and Spaces software I've used is a must. I can't believe that Vista doesn't have this :o

9. Sleep mode, which is reliable with quick waking.

10. I like terminals, please don't hide it away as though I should be afraid of it :p

No start up loading? 1-5 seconds for an operating system to load? You do realize that with a spinning hard disk drive that has to access information for the OS and all the things than an OS has to do, that there is some time involved, right? But at the same time you want a seemingly esoteric feature of it 'knowing' magically whether a new installation is a security application or an office application?

You've likely never coded a line of anything in your life.

The question didn't demand that it be technically feasible, now or in the future, just what your ideals are, a goal to work toward.

Applications could have a built in tag to tell the OS what they are, or the user could specify on installation.

There are now solid state hard drives so maybe 1-5 seconds will be possible. Personally, I use the sleep function, which gives me about 5 - 20 second wait, depending on re-connecting to the internet.

8. The virtual desktops and Spaces software I've used is a must. I can't believe that Vista doesn't have this :o

This is tricky. This has been in various Linux desktops for many years but there is a company out there who claims to have invented the idea. America allows software ideas to be patented and this company has a patent, though it has never tried to enforce it against Linux (probably because Linux has prior art).

Apple wanted the feature and pays that company royalties for every copy of Mac OS sold that includes the feature. Microsoft would have the feature, I think, if it weren't for this 'issue'. They aren't keen to pay up and they don't want to be sued, even given that the patent itself could probably be invalidated by reference to prior art.

Still, it is a good feature, but you only get it in Mac and Linux.

Windows supports virtual "desktops", they just don't provide a UI for accessing it (MS did release a powertoy for XP that provided 4 taskbar buttons, but powertoys aren't official)

And any software patent would be struck down on prior art quite quickly.

Windows supports virtual "desktops", they just don't provide a UI for accessing it (MS did release a powertoy for XP that provided 4 taskbar buttons, but powertoys aren't official)

And any software patent would be struck down on prior art quite quickly.

I found this article from Apple Insider which is quite good and has got me wondering why Apple pay a company called IP Innovation for this feature: see here at GrokLaw. I may have misread the GrokLaw pages because I am not a lawyer but it does seem that it is talking about the multiple desktop feature known as 'Spaces' in Macs.

Thanks for all your suggestions. I've documented it and will try my best to make my Operating System reflect each of your suggestions.

Keep them coming :)

Note: I'm looking for BSD Developers, Graphics Designers and more for this project. If you are interested, contact me.

I want my operating system to be mine. I mean, that copy belongs to be to install as many copies as I like and use for whatever I want, without artificial limitations on features.

I already thought of a great way to manage the computers you install it on. Great Suggestion :)

- Zero slow downs, no loading no matter what the application. Just click and open the application.

- No start up loading, just push the start button and desktop should be ready for use in 1-5 sec.

- No slow downs turning off computer, all running programs are closed in under 1-5sec.

- OS should be able to recognize types of application being installed, so everything doesn't go into program files. Perhaps something like Installed Games, Installed Secruity, Installed Office Apps, Installed Media files, etc.

- Registry shouldn't be organized better as well.

- so many improvements can be made...I could keep going

BeOS

DirectX and OpenGL support :)

OpenGL is easy because it's open... obviously. This is why all non-microsoft OSes use it primarily. DirectX is proprietary, though. The closest you're going to get on a non-microsoft OS is Wine. I'd rather not see DirectX in my OS. I'd rather see DirectX die.

This is tricky. This has been in various Linux desktops for many years but there is a company out there who claims to have invented the idea. America allows software ideas to be patented and this company has a patent, though it has never tried to enforce it against Linux (probably because Linux has prior art).

Apple wanted the feature and pays that company royalties for every copy of Mac OS sold that includes the feature. Microsoft would have the feature, I think, if it weren't for this 'issue'. They aren't keen to pay up and they don't want to be sued, even given that the patent itself could probably be invalidated by reference to prior art.

Still, it is a good feature, but you only get it in Mac and Linux.

Well that is annoying! Personally I think MS should pay for it, or file some legal challenge. I would really struggle to get by without Spaces now.

Well that is annoying! Personally I think MS should pay for it, or file some legal challenge. I would really struggle to get by without Spaces now.

Actually probably no one should pay for it. It doesn't look like a 'safe' patent in that there appears to be prior art, as someone suggested. But it's the crazy software patent system to blame really. I figure it has to keep going its mad way until a good lawsuit comes along to provoke serious change. Anyway the EU and really most of the world don't recognise these software patents, just the USA at the moment.

Software patents need to die, in the case of Linux (and UNIX), the way multiple desktops work is just a part of how they were designed, and it's been designed that way since the beginning (before the idea was patented).

MS has the technical backend, but no GUI way to implement it. It might not have anything to do with the patent.

-From BIOS to fully loaded OS in less than 10

-Fully 64-bit, no 32-bit version either.

-All devices working out of the box (includes printers/scanners/wireless/graphics cards)

-DirectX compatible

-Easily changeable Desktop Environment, no need for hacks such as uxtheme.dll for themes also

-Ability to run .exes, .rpm, .deb, idk what mac runs .dmg and .app right? (yes I know wishful thinking but thats what this is about rite?)

-Add/Remove + Package Manager, similar to ones incorporated in linux distros like ubuntu

-Compiz like or Compiz port for eye candy

-Full Support for every filesystem, but ext3 might be a good default. (ext4 actually but its not done yet)

-Free and Open Source

-No bloatware, but some good basic programs preinstalled.

-From BIOS to fully loaded OS in less than 10

-Fully 64-bit, no 32-bit version either.

-All devices working out of the box (includes printers/scanners/wireless/graphics cards)

-DirectX compatible

-Easily changeable Desktop Environment, no need for hacks such as uxtheme.dll for themes also

-Ability to run .exes, .rpm, .deb, idk what mac runs .dmg and .app right? (yes I know wishful thinking but thats what this is about rite?)

-Add/Remove + Package Manager, similar to ones incorporated in linux distros like ubuntu

-Compiz like or Compiz port for eye candy

-Full Support for every filesystem, but ext3 might be a good default. (ext4 actually but its not done yet)

-Free and Open Source

-No bloatware, but some good basic programs preinstalled.

+1 Except for having compiz, because I really don't like compiz, and I think NTFS should still be the default filesystem. I don't care whether it's free and open source or not.

An awesome ui that makes computing and everyday stuff wonderful, fun, and all warm and fuzzy inside. think something new, clean, and efficient, like a linux answer to microsoft's ribbon ui. i hate to admit it..but im enjoying office 2007 only because of that ui. while your at it... More compiz fusion effects won't hurt too. and better looking wallpapers.

A wicked media center that is easy to use yet compatible with everything including my 360. and it better run on linux too. Something like the result of Entertainer (if and when it completes) with its clutter ui and amarok make sweet love.

Most securest, yet at the same time, highly compatible, and speedy. hmmm. Linux? but with more beef....lean beef. wait! Highly Stable lean beef!

The ability to run all sorts of programs.. something like WINE or CROSSOVER and if they make Mac Wine thingy.. then we can run whatever program we like. extract those goddamn icontainer, icns, or dmg files by default. But it should be secure. very secure.. last thing i want is goddamn windows spyware running on my linux box.

And the only problem I got with my current OS... have you seen how fast Vista boots up? Please. let that fedora project on that super fast linux boot (which is also smooth and doesn't have your screen flickering due to compiz loading up) come to life. I needs it in my ubuntu!!!!

DirectX and OpenGL make sweet love also and get a new kid in town. This one better be super fast, efficient, and stable!

one last thing: Freeeeee!!!!! please! I hate macs for only this one reason. They are too expensive.. As a matter of fact.. that makes them no different from Microsoft.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!