Recommended Posts

Look, stick with XP with service pack 3. When you strip Vista down with vLite and then you install something and find out that it doesn't work properly you'll then wonder why is doesn't work. XP with SP3 has added Vista networking features. And XP with SP3 is fully compatible with connecting to Server 2008. What does the stripped down Vista you have that XP with SP3 doesn't have? I really would like to know.

When nLite came out it was not stable for about 3-4 years. vLite doesn't even seem like it's stable to use since SP1 came out.

And yes in my prior post I was referring to Vista Home Basic. I noticed that you were able to the blanks...haha.

Edited by jesseinsf

i find that on a 4000 MaH bettery amd turion tl52 x2 64 2048 ram ddr 333 (cpu z actually shows it at 200 mhz)

160gig 4200 rpm hitachie hard drive and a 15.4 inch screen vista ultimate

disabling aero just give me an extra hour to use my laptop.. no speed difference....

you could always get a vista transformation pack for xp?

Who would start a Vista Minimum install using the most feature rich version, Ultimate? I've run Vista Business and it's great on my AMD Athlon64 3000+ 1.8 Ghz machine with 2 GB of DDR400 memory.

Who would start a Vista Minimum install using the most feature rich version, Ultimate? I've run Vista Business and it's great on my AMD Athlon64 3000+ 1.8 Ghz machine with 2 GB of DDR400 memory.

Good suggestion, I may try to do that with my next vLite build. This time I will also be able to slipstream SP1 onto it as well because I am going to run vLite under Vista.

Who would start a Vista Minimum install using the most feature rich version, Ultimate? I've run Vista Business and it's great on my AMD Athlon64 3000+ 1.8 Ghz machine with 2 GB of DDR400 memory.

i have similar specs but i found 2GB was not enough so when i went to 3GB is was fine(pagefile was being used heavily)

i have similar specs but i found 2GB was not enough so when i went to 3GB is was fine(pagefile was being used heavily)

That's something I haven't really checked yet. I usually set my page file manually to 150% physical RAM so that Windows doesn't have to adjust it all the time. The physical memory usage is about 275MB after bootup, not too shabby.

That's something I haven't really checked yet. I usually set my page file manually to 150% physical RAM so that Windows doesn't have to adjust it all the time. The physical memory usage is about 275MB after bootup, not too shabby.

i let windows manage it.you could try to disable some of the scheduled tasks using vista manager.

i let windows manage it.you could try to disable some of the scheduled tasks using vista manager.

Good point.. I should check the task manager for stuff.

I usually manually set the page file, because I read that a constantly auto-adjusting page file causes the disk to fragment faster. :p

Good point.. I should check the task manager for stuff.

I usually manually set the page file, because I read that a constantly auto-adjusting page file causes the disk to fragment faster. :p

that is a myth,windows will adjust it as needed and if it needs more it will give more but if it does not it won't resize,i had problems when i manualy set it and when i let windows manage it i had no problems.

I didn't read this entire thread, but I have to wonder what some of you people complain about. The only difference in my laptop and the OP is mine uses 1GB of DDR533 and a Geforce 6800 GO video card - Vista Ultimate x86 runs BEAUTIFULLY. No tweaking...

Even though I'm on DDR533, I can't see DDR333 causing enough performance lag for it to be noticeable.

There's no reason your machine should be having trouble with Vista to the point where you're having to strip it down. You need to look into better drivers and possibly getting rid of that ATI card.

You could always disable Indexing. The simple truth is Vista needs a more powerful PC, with 2GB or more of RAM it's perfectly happy.

BTW it's the Windows 9x look, which is now 13 years old.

Why not run Windows 3.1? :D. Seriously I can understand why people turn off the theme but going back to the Windows 9x Start Menu still seems strange. Their's nothing wrong with the XP/Vista Start Menu and in fact it gives you access to My Computer too.

sure you can - if you know what you're doing... I've done it twice now on my friend's laptop, it's just not as simple as unscrwing a back-plate, removing, and putting a new one in. Usually you have to remove the entire laptop case...

It all depends on the manufacturer and the laptop itself...

That's a neat link thanks. I didn't know about "Remote Differential Compression". I don't run Vista on a Network so can turn that one off. I've already disabled Windows Defender too.

The rest though are pretty handy and it's worth seeing if you like them before just disabling them. Windows Search would be probably the first feature I'd turn off but it does make searching in Outlook much better, it's still pants when searching the System though. I always have to tick to search Non-Indexed files anyway (who indexes their entire system?) making it pretty pointless.

I wouldn't disable Superfetch, that works. Why disable Defrag too? It's there for a purpose, it's scheduled time can be changed and it only runs once a week (or whenever you set it). I just set it and forget it, most third part defrag tools are bloated and completely unnecessary for home users.

Hibernation and System Restore are both handy features too.

I've just turned SuperFetch off and my PC ground to a halt. For me it's much speedier enabled. I've disabled Indexing though, it's only marginally slower searching without it.

Yeah if you have 2+ gb of ram turning off superfetch is just pointless and detrimental to performance.

Yeah if you have 2+ gb of ram turning off superfetch is just pointless and detrimental to performance.

:huh:

It depends on how you look at it, but it's not pointless. If you just prefer the maximum amount memory available to applications that you only currently have open, then you want superfetch disabled.

If you want faster application launch times, and don't mind the extra memory usage, then superfetch should stay enabled.

Personally, I want the minimal amount of things to be in memory as possible, so all resources are available to currently open applications. It is a specific preference and I'm sure many prefer to leave it enabled, the minimalist in me just doesn't want it. :p

Yeah if you have 2+ gb of ram turning off superfetch is just pointless and detrimental to performance.

+1 and the windows vista defrag is all you need as it runs in low i/o so you won't notice it when it runs.

:huh:

It depends on how you look at it, but it's not pointless. If you just prefer the maximum amount memory available to applications that you only currently have open, then you want superfetch disabled.

Sigh.

Freeing up cached memory is one of the fastest things your operating system can do. It's not like it has to page any of it back to disk, it just has to drop it.

The moment an application makes the request to allocate memory, it's given up. There should be no performance loss involved in having Superfetch enabled when an app goes to allocate some memory. You're only going to hurt performance with it off by going to your hard disk more often. Your hard drive seek time works in milliseconds. Your RAM works in nanoseconds. That's about 5 orders of magnitude of difference.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!