Problem using Remote Desktop Connection from a Vista machine to an XP


Recommended Posts

Hey there. So here's my situation. I have a computer in my office, and I have my computer at home. I want to be able to access the computer from my computer at home, so I figure I'll setup Remote Desktop Connection. Sounds simple enough right?

Well I can't seem to connect to the computer no matter what I do. They're both behind routers, but both have been enabled DMZs and the software firewalls have been modified to incorporate RDC, so I can't figure out what the situation is here. I know a while back there was a problem with this where Microsoft released a hotfix to get Vista machines to connect to XP ones, but I still can't seem to connect.

Both computers have passwords (from what I understand that's required). If this is a problem with RDC, can anyone recommend any freeware remote desktop sharing software? I understand Linux uses some sort of VNC client but I'm not sure how to set that up on an XP machine, if it's necessary. :(

Edit - I would like to state that I tried using search but it appears there's some sort of error sending the request from my machine to the server's, as no matter how long I wait it tells me I have to wait 20 seconds for the flood control. Almost as if it's auto-sending my search requests twice. Apologies.

  shawncm217 said:
RDC works when everything's setup right. Live Mesh uses RDC for it's remote desktoping.

Then Live Mesh won't work for me as RDC doesn't work.

I can't figure out what I could possibly have set incorrectly. If all the ports are forwarded (both DMZs), and you have the IP's of both machines, and the software firewall is set to communicate with RDC, what else could be missing?

  McSmiggins said:
Just gonna ask, cos you didn't mention it...

The machine you're trying to connect to has XP Pro, RDC turned on, the right users allocated?

Oh, actually I do want to mention that I believe the computer I'm trying to connect to does NOT have XP Pro but XP Home, the Vista machine is Vista Ultimate. I was surprised to see RDC in the list of accessories, but it was there. Tell me more about allocating the users though, I might not have set that up correctly.

Edit - ok maybe I will give Mesh a try. We'll see. I should also note that the computer running XP is a very busy computer and isn't that fast, so the least resource-intensive the program, the better.

Edited by Idealist

XP home does not support Remote desktop -- only Remote Assistance, you can not remote desktop to a XP home machine.

As to mesh, from what I understand its remote desktop feature will work on xp home.

BTW -- just took a look at live mesh, and there is a waiting list for the preview. So you might have to wait to try it out. As to another option for remote access.. Try out ultravnc

http://www.uvnc.com/

lightweight, FREE works on XP home ;)

  BudMan said:
XP home does not support Remote desktop -- only Remote Assistance, you can not remote desktop to a XP home machine.

As to mesh, from what I understand its remote desktop feature will work on xp home.

BTW -- just took a look at live mesh, and there is a waiting list for the preview. So you might have to wait to try it out. As to another option for remote access.. Try out ultravnc

http://www.uvnc.com/

lightweight, FREE works on XP home ;)

I'll check out ultra vnc, but you say that XP Home doesn't support Remote Desktop, yet it's in the list of programs :blink: Why would they include it if it wasn't supported?

The Ultra VNC might work better because I believe it's naturally supported in Linux as well, meaning I can access it from a few of my other machines as well. That's good news :)

  Idealist said:
I'll check out ultra vnc, but you say that XP Home doesn't support Remote Desktop, yet it's in the list of programs :blink: Why would they include it if it wasn't supported?

The client is available on Windows XP Home, but the host is not. That is to say that you can use XP home to connect to a host, but you can not connect to XP home (as the host) from another PC.

^ exactly.. like I said XP home does not support Remote Desktop ;)

You stated your trying to connect to a XP home machine using remote desktop - which is not possible, where did you think you enabled it at? Home only supports assistance -- just as I stated.

As to connection to a machine and from a machine --- It think your a bit confused.. linux boxes are quite capable of connecting to remote desktop hosts. http://www.rdesktop.org/

Yes ultravnc works on linux as both a client and host, but not sure what naturally is suppose to mean.. if your vnc host is running java -- you do not even need a client to connect, just a browser.

  BudMan said:
^ exactly.. like I said XP home does not support Remote Desktop ;)

You stated your trying to connect to a XP home machine using remote desktop - which is not possible, where did you think you enabled it at? Home only supports assistance -- just as I stated.

As to connection to a machine and from a machine --- It think your a bit confused.. linux boxes are quite capable of connecting to remote desktop hosts. http://www.rdesktop.org/

Yes ultravnc works on linux as both a client and host, but not sure what naturally is suppose to mean.. if your vnc host is running java -- you do not even need a client to connect, just a browser.

OK I think something might've got lost in translation somewhere?? I don't know, but I went with UltraVNC. I just wish it weren't so slow. I think I'm maxing out the bandwidth on the host so it can only show me so much with the features I have enabled, but it works, and that's what matters. Thanks guys :)

And what is the upload bandwidth of the machine your connecting too? I connect using ultravnc all the time from work to home, and have no problem what so ever.. yeah if your on dial up its going to be a bit sluggish ;)

  BudMan said:
And what is the upload bandwidth of the machine your connecting too? I connect using ultravnc all the time from work to home, and have no problem what so ever.. yeah if your on dial up its going to be a bit sluggish ;)

It's 2MB up, which the vnc client reported it was going at about 1800k so it sounds about right. The computer itself isn't very fast however, single core, 256MB ram, the works.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft is removing legacy drivers from Windows Update by Usama Jawad Last month, we learned that Microsoft is making major changes to the development of hardware drivers in Windows. This included the retirement of Windows Metadata and Internet Services (WMIS), along with the process for pre-production driver signing. Now, the Redmond tech firm has informed partners that it will be getting rid of old drivers in Windows Update. In what is being described as a "strategic" move to improve the security posture and compatibility of Windows, Microsoft has announced that it will be performing a cleanup of legacy drivers that are still being delivered through Windows Update. Right now, the first phase only targets drivers that already have modern replacements present in Windows Update. As a part of its cleanup process, Microsoft will expire legacy drivers so that it is not offered to any system. This expiration involves removing audience segments in the Hardware Development Center. Partners can still republish a driver that was deemed as legacy by Microsoft, but the firm may require a justification. Once the Redmond tech giant completes its first phase of this cleanup, it will give partners a six-month grace period to share any concerns. However, if no concerns are brought forward, the drivers will be permanently eradicated from Windows Update. Microsoft has emphasized that this will be a regular activity moving forward and while the current phase only targets legacy drivers with newer replacements, the next phases may expand the scope of this cleanup and remove other drivers too. That said, each time the company takes a step in this direction, it will inform partners so that there is transparency between both parties. Microsoft believes that this move will help improve the security posture of Windows and ensure that an optimized set of drivers is offered to end-users. The firm has asked partners to review their drivers in Hardware Program so that there are no unexpected surprises during this cleanup process.
    • No idea, but I had a client the other week that lost the entire drive to it. I suggested relying on the Samsung T7's instead. The Sandisk Extreme's had reliability issues too.
    • I use it every day so personally yes I need it, or rather I want it. I use OpenShell though, not the garbage modern Start Menu. I just counted and at the moment I have a total of 92 program shortcuts organized into six folders almost exactly the way I did back in Windows 95. I can get to any program I want to run very quickly. I never use Search to find or run programs.
    • I do miss the Apps view from Windows 8.1 Update.
    • I use the search function and little else since Windows 11 (but there are times where Saved Searches take precedence since the search feature on the Start menu is worse than before). I use other features in previous releases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      lethalman went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Wayne Robinson earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      MikeK13 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      664
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      262
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      212
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      168
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      156
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!