DX11 revealed - fully compatible with DX10 hardware!


Recommended Posts

I wonder if the DirectX 10 binaries are being kept up to date. Most games you install these days usually install a DirectX 9 (month and year) Update, which is still being updated every few months by Microsoft.

What competition? OpenGL? I think most games use DirectX these days, haven't played a game in OpenGL mode for... at least 8 years or so

There's the Doom 3 engine based games (Doom 3, Quake 4, Prey, ...?). Plus their upcoming engine.

(edit: too slow. :p)

My DXDiag show DX10 . .

If DirectX 10 is not installed then your install of Vista is corrupt or hacked (if it's even possible to remove DirectX 10 from Vista without killing Aero).

You never played any Doom3 based games? (Prey, ET: Quake Wars, Quake 4)

Sure OpenGL isn't popular on Windows, but I'm sure you played a OpenGL game in that 8 year lol...

As far as I know, id tech 4 engine was directx and opengl but on windows you better be running directx and on top of that ATI owners would suffer ( at the time , only lately ATI improved opengl much )

Sorry to be a spoil sport but is anyone else starting to think DX11 is just a rebranding of DX10 to try and make it successful?

Absolutely not, this is extremely worthy of a new major version number.

While the features might not sound like much to you, they're a huge deal for developers.

GPGPU is "the next big thing", it means more realistic phyics, much more advanced A.I. and if used right, could make many amazing games. The GPU in your machine is incredibly powerful, more powerful than even Intel's latest quad core monsters when used for certain tasks - tasks that are very relevant to games.

Tessellation is another big deal and while I don't have the exact details of what it can officially do, if I'm right, it essentially means that DX11 games made today will look even more awesome than DX9 or DX10 games made tomorrow.

Tessellation is about breaking things up into triangles. In games, EVERYTHING is made out of triangles, even things that look round or square are made of triangles. More triangles means more detail on the models (i.e. the more triangles you have in your sphere, the more "round" it will look). I wouldn't be surprised if this "tessellation" they speak of means that you can now feed it in a low-poly 3D model and it'll automagically extrapolate it into a higher-res one, simply by tessellating it further.

In other words, 2 or 3 years down the line when you get a faster graphics card, you'll be able to go back and play those older games at much higher detail than was possible at the time- this is WAY better than anything AA or AF could do.

Of course, I could be wrong about that and it could be something different, but I'd wager good money on that being what it does.

I'd say that alone is worth a major number increase.

If DirectX 10 is not installed then your install of Vista is corrupt or hacked (if it's even possible to remove DirectX 10 from Vista without killing Aero).

Thats odd... because my fresh copy of vista off of a retail cd (just installed yesterday actually... had to reformat) also reports DX9. However I only have a card that supports 9 and not 10.

Thats odd... because my fresh copy of vista off of a retail cd (just installed yesterday actually... had to reformat) also reports DX9. However I only have a card that supports 9 and not 10.

Yeah, I think that's why my laptop (w/Vista) reports DX9.

start > run > "dxdiag"

It'll tell you what version of DirectX you're using, if it's DX10, you've got a DX10 card.

Actually, no. It just says DirectX's version. When I had a PC I had DirectX 9, yet my card only did DirectX 7.

That's because DirectX 1-9 are essentially one big library that has had bits added onto it over the years, DirectX 10 is entirely separate so in THIS instance, it'll only show up DX10 if DX10 hardware is installed.

dxdiag always reports the version of DirectX you have installed.

You will always have DirectX 10 on Vista, it doesn't matter what your card runs (Vista actually includes 3 different versions of DirectX, DX9, DX9ex and DX10).

dxdiag always reports the version of DirectX you have installed.

You will always have DirectX 10 on Vista, it doesn't matter what your card runs (Vista actually includes 3 different versions of DirectX, DX9, DX9ex and DX10).

That's not what these two posts are saying.

I wonder if the DirectX 10 binaries are being kept up to date. Most games you install these days usually install a DirectX 9 (month and year) Update, which is still being updated every few months by Microsoft.

i played a 2008 game in opengl ... and it looks great man ... mind you it yould be better but meh ... is still good ... besides the game is small and stupid, (racing at its worst) but great time waster ....

I do have Vista Home Premium 32 bit SP1 installed and

my system reports DirectX 9 only, thats why I asked.

post-66351-1216817161_thumb.png

It says that because for some reason your still using the out of date directx cpl that was designed for dx9c. Only dxdiag will give you the correct version in vista, that old cpl will not since it was not designed for dx10.

Comparing OpenGL to DirectX is like comparing a Car to a Car Engine. OpenGL stands for "Open Graphics Library", the X in DirectX isn't just to sound good, it's because DirectX has a LOT of parts to it - DirectAudio, DirectInput, Direct3D, etc.

Absolutely not, this is extremely worthy of a new major version number.

While the features might not sound like much to you, they're a huge deal for developers.

GPGPU is "the next big thing", it means more realistic phyics, much more advanced A.I. and if used right, could make many amazing games. The GPU in your machine is incredibly powerful, more powerful than even Intel's latest quad core monsters when used for certain tasks - tasks that are very relevant to games.

For developer, physx runs fine right now and for free (even without specific hardware).

Tessellation is another big deal and while I don't have the exact details of what it can officially do, if I'm right, it essentially means that DX11 games made today will look even more awesome than DX9 or DX10 games made tomorrow.

Tessellation is about breaking things up into triangles. In games, EVERYTHING is made out of triangles, even things that look round or square are made of triangles. More triangles means more detail on the models (i.e. the more triangles you have in your sphere, the more "round" it will look). I wouldn't be surprised if this "tessellation" they speak of means that you can now feed it in a low-poly 3D model and it'll automagically extrapolate it into a higher-res one, simply by tessellating it further.

In other words, 2 or 3 years down the line when you get a faster graphics card, you'll be able to go back and play those older games at much higher detail than was possible at the time- this is WAY better than anything AA or AF could do.

Of course, I could be wrong about that and it could be something different, but I'd wager good money on that being what it does.

I'd say that alone is worth a major number increase.

tessellation has been present since Quake 3 Team Arena, is good but yet limited in some aspect, for example can increase the curvy of some model but its unable to increase/decrease another kind of detail (such LOD).

Dx11 for developer is a pain in the a*s, to re-start learning directx again is quite painful.

How do I know if my graphics card is a DX-10 card or a DX-9 card?

I have Vista 64-bit

The following cards are DirectX 10 :

NVIDIA: GeForce 8 series, GeForce 9 series, GTX 200 series

ATI: HD 2xxx series, HD 3xxx series, HD 4xxx series

For developer, physx runs fine right now and for free (even without specific hardware).

That's entirely different - PhysX runs in SOFTWARE unless you have a special addin card or a recent NVIDIA card - the purpose of DX11 is to allow developers to run code on the GPU to help speed up the calculations, regardless to the manufacturer or whatever.

tessellation has been present since Quake 3 Team Arena, is good but yet limited in some aspect, for example can increase the curvy of some model but its unable to increase/decrease another kind of detail (such LOD).

Dx11 for developer is a pain in the a*s, to re-start learning directx again is quite painful.

You don't have to relearn DirectX again, if you know DX9, you can easily migrate to DX10...

DX10 failed because Vista "failed".

I would say neither is true.

Vista failed because so many people were trashing it. So much so, that to this day people are scared about getting a new computer with vista.

Its sad really.

Vista failed because so many people were trashing it. So much so, that to this day people are scared about getting a new computer with vista.

Its sad really.

I have to completely agree, far too many people pointed out far too many "negative" aspects of Vista. Some were worth identifying, some were minor, and some were/are not really Vista's fault. I hate ignorant people (I'm not calling anyone ignorant), but just in general.

Yea Vista failed because of people. And people now won't even give it a chance, I have been running Vista for 6 or more months now without any issues. I am actually really enjoying it and love the game that I can play in DX10, wooT!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!