Recommended Posts

I was sitting watching TV the other day and this ad comes on featuring Samual L Jackson, toting Virgin Media's "Mother of all Broadband" fibre optic service. I was curious so I did some digging to find that the broadband is not fibre optic at all - it's merely their own internal delivery system and that they're still using the Copper Co-Ax to deliver it to the house. In which case - how on earth can they advertise it as Fibre Optic broadband!? They might as well say they are fibre optic but deliver the service via old 56k dialup (not quite but it's a similar deal).

Promotional Page - http://allyours.virginmedia.com/sites/hatetowait/index.html

What are your thoughts on this?

post-33944-1216971640_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/651308-virgin-media-fibre-optic-claims/
Share on other sites

I was sitting watching TV the other day and this ad comes on featuring Samual L Jackson, toting Virgin Media's "Mother of all Broadband" fibre optic service. I was curious so I did some digging to find that the broadband is not fibre optic at all - it's merely their own internal delivery system and that they're still using the Copper Co-Ax to deliver it to the house. In which case - how on earth can they advertise it as Fibre Optic broadband!? They might as well say they are fibre optic but deliver the service via old 56k dialup (not quite but it's a similar deal).

Promotional Page - http://allyours.virginmedia.com/sites/hatetowait/index.html

What are your thoughts on this?

not true at all , i have fibre to the door and im with virgin not all of virgin has fibre to the door but alot do , it all depends what area you are in id say at least 70% is fibre to the door , even those who have coaxle still have fibre to the cabinet so their advertising is still true , if it wasn't it would have been pulled by the advertising standards agency either way coaxle to the door or fibre to the door you still get faster speeds than old crappy telephone wire :)

^ what he said.

the matter was already looked into by the ASA who cleared them of reports of lying to customers.

and as a vergin media customer while i would prefer the whole network to be fibre optic up to my house, the last few metres doesnt bother me if it works as advertised.

if anything i would be complaining about them halfing speeds after so much use, now that is annoying.

So surely it's not long til you guys get 100Mbps offered to you ;)

I'm slightly bitter that I live in a fully cabled area - however I can only receive the analogue TV services and no cable broadband due to Virgin media's reluctancy to perform whatever upgrade they need to.

I'm left with no other option but Sky - eek - actually I have to say they've been pretty good so far.

Anyway, so are the fibre optics only available in new areas or are they sticking them in older cabled areas too?

So surely it's not long til you guys get 100Mbps offered to you ;)

I'm slightly bitter that I live in a fully cabled area - however I can only receive the analogue TV services and no cable broadband due to Virgin media's reluctancy to perform whatever upgrade they need to.

I'm left with no other option but Sky - eek - actually I have to say they've been pretty good so far.

Anyway, so are the fibre optics only available in new areas or are they sticking them in older cabled areas too?

im in an area that used to belong to cable and wireless and they forsaw to install fibre to the door and then it was bought out by ntl who then merged with telewest to create virgin so it all depends on what virgin do and what area layed fibre to the door before ntl/telewest/virgin took over :)

Virgin have already announced plans to have 200Mbps by 2012 :woot:

Sounds good but I'm sure I read something about BT laying fibre optic cable somewhere - so hopefully we won't have a monopolised market in the ridiculously fast broadband area and we'll see some good consumer beneficial price wars! I'm on ADSL but live about 3km from the exchange so only receive 4Mbps of the possible 16mbps. Bring on Fibre-optic!

Sounds good but I'm sure I read something about BT laying fibre optic cable somewhere - so hopefully we won't have a monopolised market in the ridiculously fast broadband area and we'll see some good consumer beneficial price wars! I'm on ADSL but live about 3km from the exchange so only receive 4Mbps of the possible 16mbps. Bring on Fibre-optic!

Yeah was an advert that BT was planning to lay fibre optic all over the country i think by 2012 and virgin media said why wait we've got it now.

im in an area that used to belong to cable and wireless and they forsaw to install fibre to the door and then it was bought out by ntl who then merged with telewest to create virgin so it all depends on what virgin do and what area layed fibre to the door before ntl/telewest/virgin took over :)

I'm also in an ex C&W area, and I certainly don't have Fibre to the door :(

not true at all , i have fibre to the door and im with virgin not all of virgin has fibre to the door but alot do , it all depends what area you are in id say at least 70% is fibre to the door , even those who have coaxle still have fibre to the cabinet so their advertising is still true , if it wasn't it would have been pulled by the advertising standards agency either way coaxle to the door or fibre to the door you still get faster speeds than old crappy telephone wire :)

70%!!! LOL, you just made up that number. The number is actually very low, new house builds generally have fibre installed and inner city centres and places like that, obviously some areas will too, usually decided by councils and also virgin/telewest. I couldn't put a figure on it as i dont know but it would be VERY low, around 15% or so.

Cant believe they are letting virgin advertise the broadband as fibre when the majority of people dont have fibre to their door, i'm thinking a govt official is getting a nice back hand?r.

Sounds good but I'm sure I read something about BT laying fibre optic cable somewhere - so hopefully we won't have a monopolised market in the ridiculously fast broadband area and we'll see some good consumer beneficial price wars! I'm on ADSL but live about 3km from the exchange so only receive 4Mbps of the possible 16mbps. Bring on Fibre-optic!

problem with BT is the fibre isn't going to everyone, they want to reach 40-60mbps for the people close-ish to the exchanges and fibre to 1million really close people which to me is a joke, everyone should be allowed the same speed.

I was thinking the same thing because i still have the coaxial cables coming into my house. I doubt that the number of house that have fibre optic right to the door is anywhere near 70% though. I'm assuming that it's only the newer customers that are getting it.

BT said that around 40% of the people will be able to get 40-60mbps. Thats not many for ?1.5bn. As for fibre, thats only really going to be for new builds they said with some selected areas too. Until we can get fibre we are always gunna have slow upload speed, UK isp's just dont want us to upload at all, 20mb down, 0.75mb up, just ludicrous! gimme atleast 5mb up!

My area took a while to have the exchange upgraded for adsl2+ so i reckon it will take a long time for the 40-60mb from BT. Also bt are only spending ?200m for the 1st two years of upgrading, then 1.3bn or so in the last year. So basically virtually no-one will be getting 40-60mb until 2010 onwards. The govt should just say "upgrade the network fully to fibre or we wont let you operate in the uk". 20mb down is pretty quick tbh, its just the stupid caps and speed restrictions to 5mb which is the problem because virgin trying to get as many customers as possible but dont wanna pay to upgrade the network which is FULL to capacity. Wouldnt be suprised if they make it 1000mb but throttled to 10mb during peak hours, 4gb cap and advertise it as gigabit speed.

^^ of course an ISP doesn't want to fully fibre their network, they'd be bankrupt if they did as customers refuse to pay for things they supposedly want

nah, BT calculated as being ?12bn to upgrade everything to fibre, they could carry on with current speeds and prices but add 100mb and 1000mb to speeds and charge like ?50 and ?200 a month, no-one would complain as everything would still be the same but rich people could get crazy fast broadband. Then over time lower the prices of the 100 and 1000mb, they'd recoup the investment in 5yrs or so i reckon, they could then also add multiple hd channels and a box to record 2 hd channels at once, renting 720p movies etc, they'd have loads of ways to make money with 100mb or 1000mb speeds. They want the govt to pay a big chunk tho.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
    • OK so SearXNG is a meta search engine that you can install locally or use via a public instance. It scrapes other search engines which you choose and then sorts the results. Not as complicated as multiple relays
    • The only difference here is that you think you came up with these reasons. You didn't. These age old fearmongering lies (that were NEVER true) were funded by and the anger stoked by Putin through proxies like Farage (and later in the USA, Trump) and filtered down through the skinheads, Neonazis, etc. until it reached the uninformed, ignorant, and gullible -- never realizing they were being played for fools against their own best interests. Even now, despite all of the EVIDENCE proving that Brexit was a terrible mistake for ALL citizens of the UK and that its supporters were tricked by Putin's proxies into sabotaging their own nation, you're still here defending these well-known lies as if they were ever true. Not only are they not true. They NEVER were. So, when are you going to realize that you were lied to and actually get angry at the liars and charlatans who lied to you, instead of blaming the innocent people they lied to you about?
    • Dupe of "Microsoft further improving Windows 11 Taskbar with latest builds", published <20 minutes apart
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!