Any good Wireless Routers compatible with Vista?


Recommended Posts

wrt54gl with any third party firmware like tomato or dd-wrt and its the best.

I got an old wrt54gv5 which it happens the same problems of connection freeze, and have to restart so i put a micro version and it works like charm, a ROUTER its OS independent, i have mostly vista laptop and it runs great.

Ive got a WRT54GL Access point that links my network via a WRT54GL WET Bridge, I'm running Vista and I can say that it is snappy and compatible...

Due to distance my transfer speeds are only around 2200KB/sec max but I'm aiming to resolve this with a powerline network..

Switched LAN Transfer is fine and I've had no crashes...

Uptime 10 days, 05:00:34

CPU Load (1 / 5 / 15 mins) 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.00

Total / Free Memory 14.14 MB / 3,888.00 KB (26.84%)

Previous uptime was 93 Days, I upgraded the firmware which explains the 10 day uptime

There is actually such a thing as a Vista compatible router. It's due to the way Microsoft re-wrote the TCP/IP stack, and the traffic scaling it does. Some older routers have problems forwarding these packets.

:nod:

Yup. There is some trickery going on with Vista. Also some routers are "plug and play" which in some cases eliminates the need to login to your router to setup static port forwards to a particular computer. There is also the "Internet Gateway Device" that shows up in your Network Devices that allows the user to setup port forwarding and firewall settings without actually logging into the router.

All that being said,

Any router should be "compatible" with any OS (in the sense that it supports the same Ethernet standards as any other network router).

:nod:

Yup. There is some trickery going on with Vista. Also some routers are "plug and play" which in some cases eliminates the need to login to your router to setup static port forwards to a particular computer. There is also the "Internet Gateway Device" that shows up in your Network Devices that allows the user to setup port forwarding and firewall settings without actually logging into the router.

All that being said,

Any router should be "compatible" with any OS (in the sense that it supports the same Ethernet standards as any other network router).

IGD is simply uPNP (Universal Plug and Play)

This router is junk!

Exactly and everyone is insisting that I use it instead of upgrading because it's "stable." That router is too old. I had to upgrade. Unfortunately, I bought a Netgear WNR834B which frequently crashes and according to the reviews I read, I ain't the only one having that problem.

Exactly and everyone is insisting that I use it instead of upgrading because it's "stable." That router is too old. I had to upgrade. Unfortunately, I bought a Netgear WNR834B which frequently crashes and according to the reviews I read, I ain't the only one having that problem.

:angry:

NO ONE keeps saying to use it. We wanted to know what it was. I still say update the firmware and see it it works. I keep linking you (as others are) to the WRT54GL which is the router you should buy and put the custom firmware on it and is the best consumer router on the market.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16833124190

Exactly and everyone is insisting that I use it instead of upgrading because it's "stable." That router is too old. I had to upgrade. Unfortunately, I bought a Netgear WNR834B which frequently crashes and according to the reviews I read, I ain't the only one having that problem.

WRT54 Looks the same but its not junk.

If your not gonna read and take in the help thats given, why are you asking for it?

Seven separate people have recommended the Linksys WRT54G series (mainly: WRT54GL) w/ custom firmware. That's the most conclusive you are going to get. As hfj288 says, if you aren't going to take the help, why ask? Go to Best Buy and pick up another garbage router if you want.

:angry:

NO ONE keeps saying to use it. We wanted to know what it was. I still say update the firmware and see it it works. I keep linking you (as others are) to the WRT54GL which is the router you should buy and put the custom firmware on it and is the best consumer router on the market.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16833124190

Ok ok. I just got back from work. I'll have to wait for the weekend to go to the store. Besides I have to return the Netgear first. Besides, I just looked that up. The specifications doesn't say that it's compatible with Vista.

WRT54 Looks the same but its not junk.

If your not gonna read and take in the help thats given, why are you asking for it?

Someone else said it was junk and I just agreed. No one here is actually helping. I'm asking for a GOOD VISTA COMPATIBLE ROUTER!!! Microsoft has a list of them. http://winqual.microsoft.com/HCL/ProductLi...d=712&f=86b

Now, let me try to simplify the question. On that link, which one of those routers are good? Now, keep in mind, it must be on that list.

Ok ok. I just got back from work. I'll have to wait for the weekend to go to the store. Besides I have to return the Netgear first.

Someone else said it was junk and I just agreed. No one where is actually helping. I'm asking for a GOOD VISTA COMPATIBLE ROUTER!!! Microsoft has a list of them. http://winqual.microsoft.com/HCL/ProductLi...d=712&f=86b

Now, let me try to simplify the question. On that link, which one of those routers are good. Now, keep in mind, it must be on that list.

God Damnit. It IS VISTA COMPATIBLE

http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c...d=2962541396L15

I (along with 7 others here) have this router. Two of my machines are Windows Vista. it works JUST FINE. Microsoft is just reccomending draft 802.11n routers. its just Marketing. Again, its like saying a pre-vista computer can't run vista, even though it has a Core2Duo.

I'm going to PM a mod and have this thread closed.

Obviously you seem to know more then all the others in this thread, so the go buy one off of that list. I promise it will be nowhere near as good as the WRT54GL that we have been telling you.

God Damnit. It IS VISTA COMPATIBLE

http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c...d=2962541396L15

I (along with 7 others here) have this router. Two of my machines are Windows Vista. it works JUST FINE. Microsoft is just reccomending draft 802.11n routers. its just Marketing

I'm going to PM a mod and have this thread closed.

Obviously you seem to know more then all the others in this thread, so the go buy one off of that list. I promise it will be nowhere near as good as the WRT54GL that we have been telling you.

What the hell? If you're getting so upset, then just don't post. On that list, those are the routers that have been fully tested for Vista. You don't know much, believe me. You said there's no such thing as Vista compatible routers and many people have proved you wrong. And trust me, it's not marketing. My older Linksys had the TCP/IP issue that was mentioned earlier. Why are you insisting that routers don't have compatibility issues with Vista when I've experienced the issues myself?

What the hell? If you're getting so upset, then just don't post. On that list, those are the routers that have been fully tested. You don't know much, believe me. You said there's no such thing as Vista compatible routers and many people have proved you wrong.

Seriously...go away. Just buy whatever crap you want off that list, and be done with it.

What the hell? If you're getting so upset, then just don't post. On that list, those are the routers that have been fully tested. You don't know much, believe me. You said there's no such thing as Vista compatible routers and many people have proved you wrong.

Because you keep showing your ignorance to marketing ploys and keep thinking that list is god.

So what. Microsoft doesn't spend a billion dollars testing every piece of hardware on the market.

There is no such thing as a Vista"COMPATIBLE" router. A router is a router. The firmware on the router might be "opimized" for vista, but old routers work the same. The routers / switches our school uses are at least 8 years old, yet guess what they run vista.

Seriously...go away. Just buy whatever crap you want off that list, and be done with it.

I did. It was the Netgear and it crashes. So, I'm asking if anyone can recommend one off the list that's good. Why is this question so difficult??

There is no such thing as a Vista"COMPATIBLE" router. A router is a router. The firmware on the router might be "opimized" for vista, but old routers work the same. The routers / switches our school uses are at least 8 years old, yet guess what they run vista.

Then how do you explain the TCP/IP issue that I was experiencing with my old router?? I had some sorta Vista problem with it. What else can it be?

I did. It was the Netgear and it crashes. So, I'm asking if anyone can recommend one off the list that's good. Why is this question so difficult??

Because we reccomended you the best router on the market and because you can't get past the microsoft marketing, you don't believe us.

End of story.

Then how do you explain the TCP/IP issue that I was experiencing with my old router?? I had some sorta Vista problem with it. What else can it be?

No idea. Its extremely old. We're talking around 7-8 years old. The Linksys we keep reccomending you has custom firmware which keeps getting updated. Heck the latest update was this past month.

Because we reccomended you the best router on the market and because you can't get past the microsoft marketing, you don't believe us.

End of story.

Ok, I will go to Best Buy this weekend and return my Netgear router. I will then buy the Linksys WRT54GL. I can only pray that it will perform the way you said it would.

So, I'm going to take the advice that's given to me. Now, I hope we can all be friends again.

I got a very modest Dlink G604T - have used it for many many moons and have had no issues from vista. you turn it on, configure and away you go.

Hell, I have a WRT54G v8 with the latest stock FW, it's working just fine with two Vista SP1 machines, two XP Pro SP3 machines, and a PCLinuxOS 2007 machine. One XP machine and the linux machine both have a Trendnet TEW-443PI wireless card in them. They all work just fine. The only thing about it not being "Vista Compatible" might have been the router setup cd, but I didn't/wouldn't use it anyway.

Ok, I will go to Best Buy this weekend and return my Netgear router. I will then buy the Linksys WRT54GL. I can only pray that it will perform the way you said it would.

So, I'm going to take the advice that's given to me. Now, I hope we can all be friends again.

Wait... did you finally realize? :woot: Wow... well...

You won't be disappointed in the WRT54G. If you still have problems, at least we will know it's not the router. ;)

Some routers are indeed problematic with Vista. It is luckily a small subset of routers. Almost all of these routers had their incompatibilities fixed with firmware updates shortly after Vista's release (some before Vista's release). If you have a router that is entering reboot loops (a symptom of being incompatible with Vista), then check for firmware update. Chances are good that one is available that fixes your problem.

The problem lies in part with Receive Window Auto-Tuning, and in part with ECN.

Just because a router is old, or not labeled as "Vista Compatible", doesn't mean it won't work with Vista. Odds are extremely good that it'll work regardless. For example, I've got a four year old WRT54GS that works wonderfully with Vista. I've also got a DLink DGL-4300. Not labeled as Vista compatible, but it works fine nonetheless. Also got a couple of FON's. They also aren't labeled as being Vista compatible, but, surprise, they also work.

tl;dr, it was always a small problem that is far less common now than it was last year. Don't worry about it.

It's not outdated.

Its 802.11G.

How much faster do you actually need? If you are looking for a draft N, then your limited . Its hands-down the best 802.11G router on the market, which unless you plan on transferring gig's of data over your network, its plenty fast for the internet

Heres this 802.11n router with DD-WRT

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16833124085

Not sure on it, but DD-WRT is the best firmware to date

While I do like DD-WRT, I would instead prefer the WRT54GS (not GL) as being Linksys' best G router; especially with the 2.x chipset/firmware (which works a treat with DD-WRT). Also, there is a quibble that I have with DD-WRT (in fact, most Linksys third-party firmware): the problems with IPv6. However this is an ongoing issue with routers in general. And given that draft-N is still *draft*, what's the issue preventing draft-N from becoming real-N? While most draft-N routers do offer built-in gigabit switching capability (which is useful with more wired desktops supporting gigabit), the fact that draft-N is still *draft* has me nervous.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!