Recommended Posts

Well first off, i'm 20 and have never bought a car.

Second, my parents only buy volvos/BMWs, cars which you can't really haggle with because they're quality cars and don't sit around on the lot too long.

If the MSRP is 30k, add options unless you want a bare bones car. Options on BMW/volvos take it easily into the $35k range. Knock 2-3 grand off it, and there's the $32k I mentioned.

Well first off, i'm 20 and have never bought a car.

Second, my parents only buy volvos/BMWs, cars which you can't really haggle with because they're quality cars and don't sit around on the lot too long.

If the MSRP is 30k, add options unless you want a bare bones car. Options on BMW/volvos take it easily into the $35k range. Knock 2-3 grand off it, and there's the $32k I mentioned.

The MSRP is the final price set by the manufacturer AFTER options. Unless you get dealer installed options then that IS the final price before you haggle it down a bit.

The hunt is over

They went with the 300c

Which ironically was the 1st thing I suggested, before I got the criteria

eh.. on the upside ill prolly be getting a used Magnum by the end of the year. Nothing special, just something sporty, roomy and with low insurance rates. Which given the fact that I need a car, and I dont have much money, seems to be the best option.

Pick up a Chrysler 300 or Dodge Charger with the 3.5 v6 in it. Gets good gas mileage, plus.... you have a lifetime warranty on the powertrain.

im not even going to bother looking up the vital statistics of that car, but i doubt a 3.5ltr v6 engine in an american car has good mileage!

what exactly are you comparing it to? the ****ing titanic?

Pick up a Chrysler 300 or Dodge Charger with the 3.5 v6 in it. Gets good gas mileage, plus.... you have a lifetime warranty on the powertrain.

the warranty is valid as long as you do ALL of the scheduled maintenance (on time) with a chrysler dealer.

im not even going to bother looking up the vital statistics of that car, but i doubt a 3.5ltr v6 engine in an american car has good mileage!

what exactly are you comparing it to? the ****ing titanic?

if i'm not mistaken it will get around 16 city.

the 300 i have at home is the 2.7 i think and that gets 23 city.

the warranty is valid as long as you do ALL of the scheduled maintenance (on time) with a chrysler dealer.

Do you have a source for this info? The last car manufacture that required all maintenance to be done at the dealer was sued and the requirement was struck down.

Do you have a source for this info? The last car manufacture that required all maintenance to be done at the dealer was sued and the requirement was struck down.

ya, he's full of it. As long as you have receipts for even the oil and filters, ect. you'll be fine.

As far as mileage goes, the 3.5 actually does get quite good mileage. 4 cylinders aren't always best for mileage you know...

ya, he's full of it. As long as you have receipts for even the oil and filters, ect. you'll be fine.

As far as mileage goes, the 3.5 actually does get quite good mileage. 4 cylinders aren't always best for mileage you know...

Yeah, that's what I figured and hoped. I just did the oil change on my friends Charger with the 3.5 two weekends ago in his driveway. I think the bastards do try to discourage anyone from doing their own maintenance though, no section on it in his owners manual and no oil capacity listed (every other capacity listed though). I would hope that would not violate warranty. As I rule I don't let anyone else perform simple maintenance on my own cars.

i was thinking more about the grossly unecessary 3.5ltr part...

I'm not sure what your objection specifically is. The engine puts out 255hp and 250ft-lbs and gets 17/24. The Hp and Torque numbers are decent for the engine size and the fuel economy is what about you would expect from such a large and heavy vehicle. This is a fairly large sedan with a lot of space under the hood and plenty of chassis weight already. They didn't really need to put an exotic high strung 2 liter in it. There is room and engine weight is not a concern. Nor would a lower HP engine really be enough to propel this heavy beast down the road. My friend owns a 3.5 charger and though it really isn't a car that I would buy; it is tame when I want it to be and is capable of some fun (in a straight line at least) when I want it to be. The 3.5 high output seems about right to me.

I'll use an example that we discovered in our Chrysler dealership when I was selling cars. The Dodge Dakota came with a 3.7L, a 4.7L, or a 4.7L HO (High Output). If you were to look at the EPA guides, it shows that the 3.7L gets worse mileage than both the 4.7L models. So we kept asking our customers what they were getting (and of course chopped off the totally wacky high and low numbers because people are idiots) and found that indeed, the 4.7L models got better mileage. We did our own test next. We let the owner's wife drive each of them till the tank was empty. She is a very casual driver, so none of the pedal stomping we'd be doing. The best mileage came from the 4.7L HO, with the other 4.7L closely behind. The 3.7L actually (in our test) got 5mpg worse than the 4.7L and about 6 worse than the 4.7L HO.

We then decided to stop carrying the 3.7L unless somebody wanted to special order one. Anybody that wanted a 3.7L we would explain our findings. Some people of course were always "a smallert engine ALWAYS gets better mileage". That is simply not the case though.

Top Gear even did a comparison between the BMW M3 and the Prius. The M3 got much better mileage.

Here's a couple of good ones:

  • VW Passat
  • Nissan Maxima (some may even consider the Altima to be "full-size")
  • Mercury Milan (Rented one in the summer for a couple of months and found it pretty enjoyable)

I do not recommend Chrysler or associated brands for reliability.

I also would recommend the Vectra if they sell that where you live (you can find it under the Opel/Chevrolet/Saturn brands)

ya, he's full of it. As long as you have receipts for even the oil and filters, ect. you'll be fine.

As far as mileage goes, the 3.5 actually does get quite good mileage. 4 cylinders aren't always best for mileage you know...

let me rephrase that... you must go to a chrysler dealer for the scheduled 'check up' of the powertrain inspection. The first time i had read it from autoblog. I'm sure it'll be one of those, well you got your services done at jiffy lube and missed a few oil changes by a couple thousand miles, therefore your warranty is void.

In order to maintain the Chrysler Lifetime Powertrain Warranty, you must have a powertrain inspection performed by an authorized Chrysler, Jeep or Dodge dealer once every 5 years. This inspection, performed at no charge, must be made within 60 days of each 5-year anniversary of the warranty start date of the vehicle. It is your responsibility to perform preventative maintenance on your vehicle. You?re strongly encouraged to follow the instructions contained in the Scheduled Maintenance Service guidelines in your Owner?s Manual.

That makes far more sense than requiring the oil changes, ect to be done at the dealer. Once every 5 years and at no cost I can handle as long as the dealer doesn't make up problems at the inspection. I would probably have it checked over by an independent mechanic prior to the dealer just in case. And as far as keeping maintenance records, I do for my own use and for the next guy when I sell the car, but I'm not giving them to the dealer. Let them prove I didn't keep up maintenance.

And yeah I know that I'm paranoid, but I have a few bad experiences at the dealer.

You guys must have crummy dealers or something. In my immediate family we have owned ~15 (too lazy to count) Chrysler products. None of them have ever required more than maintenance until they have gotten over 400,000 kms and quite old. My car ('95 Dodge Avenger) is the only exception as I had a planetary gear shoot through the transission case a couple months ago at ~200,000kms. Even then though I can't really blame Chrysler because 1) I've been very hard on the car and 2) The whole car's really a mitsubishi. I got it fixed with an updated casing (they actually did solve the issue with a case revision, something most companies wouldn't do) and I know it will last me a lot longer.

As far as giving the maintenance records to the dealer: You only need to show them, not GIVE them to the dealer. If they insist on having them, just get them to photocopy them. I 100% guarantee they will not take your records. If you trade it in though, definitely DO give the records. You will get a lot more money for your vehicle.

About the 5 year thing: so what's the problem? It's free and if anything IS wrong have it fixed for free. It's an issue with the powertrain, so it needs to be honored by the warranty. They are doing this so you don't cause farther problems like a blown engine or transmission.

My dealer problems were not Chrysler dealers. My friend had a problem with his Intrepid though. Blown engine that they didn't want to cover under warranty probably one of those crummy dealers. To Chrysler's credit after he started talking to someone in their corporate office, well the local dealership became more reasonable. I work as a marine mechanic so I tend to do my own work and just in general am distrustful of others working on my vehicles. Nothing against Chrysler dealers specifically. My go to guy when I can't figure out auto problems is a mechanic at the local Honda dealer, so I know there are quality guys at dealers also.

I wouldn't even show them my records really. If they want records then it is their responsibility to keep them. I really do not want them looking for an excuse to get out of their warranty and I do a decent job on maintenance as it is. Keep the burden of proof on them. Now I do provide the records at time of sale. Either to the dealer or to the private buyer. At that point they or he needs that info.

I don't have a problem with a free inspection once every five years. Sounds entirely reasonable to me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!