Recommended Posts

I have a total of three PCs going through a router and I often use them to share files etc, but due to a recent virus attack I would like to isolate one of the PCs from the network so that it can't spread viruses etc through the network.

I'm guessing that once isolated it should still be able to use the printer (which is also plugged into the router) and continue to access the internet as well.

Any help would be much appreciated.

thanks for the reply.

what i meant was that it no longer has the ability to send/receive information to the other computers as it did when I had the recent virus problem. I've tried to change the workgroup but it still seems to be able to see/view/change the other computers information.

hope this clears what i mean!

  popisdead uk said:
Take it out of the same domain/workgroup. That will stop it sharing files
And where did you get that tidbit of misinformation from??

What workgroup your in has NOTHING to do with file sharing, and to be honest either does the domain really -- as long as you auth to the machine with a valid account you can access resources. A domain just makes it easier to give permissions since there is a central userbase.

And this clearly does not isolate the machine from possible viruses or exploits to the ports they are listening on, ie the file sharing ports, etc. Not having a valid account to auth with will not always protect you from a virus/exploit - but it will protect you from that machines virus from infecting every file it has permission too, depending on what account its logged in as, etc.

So blocking the account the other machine logs in with from having file share access would provide some minor protection. But if using SFS, thats not possible -- would need to have pro with the ability to give different accounts different access to files/shares, etc. But that would not protect you from an exploit using the file sharing ports, etc.

If you router does not allow you to setup vlans and put access control lists between them. Then your going to need to run software filewalls on the machines or put them behind a nat compared to the other machine. You would then need to do a port forward to allow printer access. Quite often this is port 9100, it would depend exactly how your sharing your printer - be it connected to a machine or on a stand alone printer server device, or if the printer has its own network card, etc.

Treating a machine(s) as hostile on the same local network is what software firewalls are good for! If you run software firewalls on your machines -- just use them to block access from that one machine.

One way as mentioned to put a line of protection between that machine and your other machines is to put the other machines behind another nat router.

example layout;

post-14624-1218542661_thumb.png

But I would REALLY NOT suggest this -- since the double nat comes with quite a few of its own headaches. Your best bet is to get a router that supports lan to lan firewall rules. There are few out there -- but not recalling any model numbers off the top of my head.. Would have to look around for one that does -- but they are out there for sure. What router do you have now?

Believe me -- I would love to get off the soapbox about FUD -- but it seems no matter how many times you state FACT and discredit FUD, it still manages to stay around. And the misconceptions about what a workgroup is and does just never seems to go way -- Arrrghhh ;)

I would love to know what you thought the question was asking -- that suggesting a different workgroup or domain would isolate it.

  technics said:
I have a total of three PCs going through a router and I often use them to share files etc, but due to a recent virus attack I would like to isolate one of the PCs from the network so that it can't spread viruses etc through the network.

I'm guessing that once isolated it should still be able to use the printer (which is also plugged into the router) and continue to access the internet as well.

Any help would be much appreciated.

So you want to stop computer (1) from giving it's virus to computers (2) and (3) on the network, but still want it to spread the virus to the internet?

You do know they make good FREE anti-virus software don't you? Right here on Neowin.

  BudMan said:
Believe me -- I would love to get off the soapbox about FUD -- but it seems no matter how many times you state FACT and discredit FUD, it still manages to stay around. And the misconceptions about what a workgroup is and does just never seems to go way -- Arrrghhh ;)

I would love to know what you thought the question was asking -- that suggesting a different workgroup or domain would isolate it.

I honestly don't know mate. It was early this morning when I read it. I think I thought he meant, .... I have no idea. Really.

If I had read it properly I would have seen what he was trying to do, and I would have ignored it.

Follow up: Router that supports lan to lan firewall rules, yes I know this model is EOL, but its an example of what I was talking about with lan to lan rules on a home priced router.

post-14624-1218551467.jpg

Also if your router will run dd-wrt or openwrt you can setup vlans and use iptables to deny specific traffic between the vlans, etc. Not sure if tomato can do this?

So you can accomplish what you want fairly simple with home priced network equipment to be sure. I do not believe the current web ui to dd-wrt supports lan to lan firewall rules? But can be done from the command line after a bit of reading for sure. Or I do believe you can run firewall builder on it. http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Firewall_Builder which would give you a gui in building your rules.

Another option would be to run a linux distro as your router, ipcop I know allows for multiple segments and then rules between them. Any of the router distro's should be able to do something as basic as this.

What I would suggest is if your current router does not support either dd-wrt or lan to lan rules is since you would need to buy another router to use the double nat method anyway -- is purchase one that allows for lan to lan filtering, or one that supports 3rd party firmware that will allow you to do it.

thanks for that.. (just going out atm and will read your post when i return)

i just had a quick idea, which is probably very silly but thought i might ask anyway. would disabling/removing file and printer sharing for Microsoft networks in the local area connection properties help solve the problem i'm having?

thanks for that.. (just going out atm and will read your post when i return)

i just had a quick idea, which is probably very silly but thought i might ask anyway. would disabling/removing file and printer sharing for Microsoft networks in the local area connection properties help solve the problem i'm having?

On which machine? On the machine your worried about, or the other machines. If turn off file and print sharing on the machine your saying is hostile -- that does not prevent some type of infection from doing anything -- just that it would not be able to use the built in file and print sharing to do it.

But without know exactly which infection your looking to protect against.. You would need to understand its method of spreading to know if that could stop it.

Now doing it on the 3 other machines would prevent them from listing, and or anything from accessing file shares, etc.. EVEN yourself for you legit use, etc.. Its a pretty harsh fix -- and this does not mean that they would still be safe from any type of infection the other machine might pick up that uses say a rpc exploit, to compromise the other machines.

You need to isolate the friendly machines from the hostile machine. This can be done with firewalls on each of the friendly machines, or with firewall between them (the lan to lan rules example) or by putting the friendly machines behind a nat to the network the hostile machine is on, etc. etc.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It depends if they can market it to hipsters, then they might hold a niche.
    • No Man's Sky Beacon update overhauls settlements and player overseer duties by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Hello Games is back with another major update to its sci-fi space survival game No Man's Sky. This time, it has targeted settlement systems. The title will now let players be overseers who manage settlements across multiple planets while also discovering towns run entirely by robotic lifeforms. Space-faring players can now be the overseers of four settlements across the universe, with the job being offered to them after completing a unique objective. "Govern your settlers wisely and invest in their infrastructure to enable each settlement to flourish, producing lucrative resources, and becoming an invaluable base of operations throughout your journey," explains the studio. Settlement management has also been completely reworked with this update. Hello Games says that players will now have more important construction and upgrade choices, as each building has its own calculated contribution to the happiness, population, and productivity of its settlement. These can benefit the player via a wide range of resource production options. Not only that, each settler will even have their own personalities, strengths, weaknesses, and skills that will change how they work in their community. Players can find these by simply talking to any settler they meet on a planet. When a citizen dispute comes up, the number of choices offered to the overseer has been increased as well. As for the robotic settlements, they can only be found by scanning planets with specialist technology. Once found, these Autophage settlements can be taken over as well, letting players be the overseer and take care of the scrap metal-built locals. Other additions to this update include Intel Xe Super Sampling (XeSS) upscaling tech support on PC, more voice types for player characters, better snapping when building structures, and cross-save support across all platforms. Don't forget that No Man's Sky will soon be arriving on a brand-new platform too. The title will be a day-one launch on the Nintendo Switch 2 on June 5. Find the complete patch notes for No Man's Sky 5.7 Beacon Update over here.
    • Eh. I think I'm more in favor of this not being a thing. One of the most useful things on Reddit is being able to see if the person posting is consistently who they say they are. Hiding posts just allows shitposters to hide.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      mywakehealth earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      jbatch earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Leonard grant earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      portacnb1 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      portacnb1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      294
    2. 2
      snowy owl
      159
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      155
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      140
    5. 5
      Xenon
      126
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!