prevent users using remote desktop


Recommended Posts

  barteh said:
I've just tried this on an account in AD called 'Test' which isnt a member of the local admins or anything.

I ticked the deny box but RD still loads fine.

I've tried re-logging on a few times as that user, but to no avail.

Does anything else have to refresh?

Your saying it "loads fine". Do you mean to block the act of using mstsc.exe and connecting and logging on to remote computer? Or to block the mere mstsc.exe from even opening?

Again -- what exactly are the users doing that you want to stop? That setting in AD has nothing to do with them running the remote desktop client and connecting to some box running remote desktop, etc.

I am going to take a guess you have users using remote desktop to access machines outside your network to say surf the net, play solitare, etc..

Is this what your trying to stop?

As mentioned you could prevent them from running the exe on their machines -- but there are 3rd party remote desktop clients they could run. Or for that matter why does it have to be remote desktop - they could just vnc to boxes outside your network, etc..

The details of exactly what your users are doing that you want to stop would be most helpful for us to suggest ways to prevent them from doing it.

If the issue is users having remote control of PCs outside of your network then outgoing firewall policies will need to be put in place. But again, there are specific questions and answers needed.

^ and it does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that if you block outbound access on 3389, to just have the machine listen on another port -- say 80 or 443 for remote desktop connections.

Trying to block users from access to things outside of your control is a uphill battle to say the least, its like trying to block spam.. As soon as you block one thing, they figure out a new way to get it paste the filters, etc.

  BudMan said:
^ and it does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that if you block outbound access on 3389, to just have the machine listen on another port -- say 80 or 443 for remote desktop connections.

Trying to block users from access to things outside of your control is a uphill battle to say the least, its like trying to block spam.. As soon as you block one thing, they figure out a new way to get it paste the filters, etc.

Very true, it can get condeluded when talking about blocking outbound traffic. It is very easy to change the port RDP uses. It is of course still an option if he wanted to take that route.

Really the only options I see are:

1. Denying users from using Terminal Services via AD. Applies only in your environment.

2. Block all outbound traffic with the exception of legitimate ports. This could be very maintainence intensive and could get very condeluded, but could also work.

3. Block the mstsc.exe from ever executing in the first place. This would without a doubt stop RDP access regardless of what PC they are connecting to. However other forms of remote control could be used as stated using different ports.

So perhaps a combination of these could best suit you.

Sorry for the long delay.

I've blocked the terminal services in AD, several days on, this had made no difference.

We're using SBS2003, so dont have ISA server to have real control over outgoing ports etc.

Whats the easiest way to block the mstsc.exe in GPO?

I've never made any software restrictions before, so in simple terms would really help :)

  barteh said:
Sorry for the long delay.

I've blocked the terminal services in AD, several days on, this had made no difference.

We're using SBS2003, so dont have ISA server to have real control over outgoing ports etc.

Whats the easiest way to block the mstsc.exe in GPO?

I've never made any software restrictions before, so in simple terms would really help :)

If this is not working there's something wrong and I'd suggest you resolve it in case they work around the software restriction policy.

The Deny restriction applies to the user account that is being used to connect and not to the user launching the terminal services session, could that be the problem?

  barteh said:
i've gone to:

User Configuration\Administrative Templates\System

"dont run specified Windows applications" = enabled

and added: mstsc.exe

Doesn't that policy just compare a filename and/or its path to block the specified EXE? If so, couldn't a user just copy the file elsewhere (and/or rename it) and run it from there?

  bobbba said:
If this is not working there's something wrong and I'd suggest you resolve it in case they work around the software restriction policy.

The Deny restriction applies to the user account that is being used to connect and not to the user launching the terminal services session, could that be the problem?

quite possibly.

What your saying is:

So in AD i tick the deny box which says Bart cannot use Term Services, but so long as I log into another machine with a different account Its letting me?

I've tried the .exe i'll just wait and see what happens.

Scenario for how it works:

Admin creates AD account Bart2, default is allow term services

Admin edits AD account Bart1, deny term services

Bart1 logons on to pc1 opens mstc and attempts to remote desktop pc2

pc2 asks pc1 for a logon

bart specifies his logon (Bart1)

pc2 checks the ad to see whether Bart1 is allowed access, then denies him access

Bart1 tries again:

opens mstc and attempts to remote desktop pc2

pc2 asks pc1 for a logon

bart1 specifies Bart2

pc2 checks the ad to see whether Bart2 is allowed access, then allows him access

So basically the check is all about whether an account is allowed to complete a connection and logon to a remote desktop, not whether an account is allowed to attempt a connection.

If the accounts are setup properly, this should work perfectly well as the user won't know the credentials for other accounts so the restriction works. Restricting the exe and preventing them from launching the client is a really poor workaround except for when the computers they are trying to access are not within the organisation's control (like home pc's over the internet) which is when a firewall with outgoing control should be used.

Sorry bobba, I think I should have explained in more detail earlier.

The Machine the user is connecting to is a home machine.

And like I mentioned earlier, we dont have ISA so we dont have that sort of control, and the admins do use RDP ourselves, so I dont want to completely disable it.

Sounds like you need something like the following:

software restriction policy:

Block the filename of MSTSC

Block the hash values of the various versions of MSTSC

Prevent it from applying to local admins

(if your troublesome users don't have them, use GPO security filtering if they do)

Articles to help:

MS Howto

Tutorial

Those are the technical means of controlling it, the organisation should also have a computer/internet usage policy as well so that they have to consciously break the rules to do something like this and if they do a discipline procedure can be applied.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • OK Microsoft, can you please fire the entire Windows team and hire those 20 Xbox developers instead to work on Windows? We'd all pretty much want to have a light and bloat free Windows!
    • Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 is out this year, landing with a "mind-bending" co-op campaign by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A surprise Call of Duty announcement landed during the Xbox Game Showcase event today, with Treyarch and Raven Software unveiling Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 as the next entry in the massively popular FPS franchise. While many were expecting the 2025 entry to be a Modern Warfare game, this will be the first time in the history of the series that two Black Ops games will be releasing back to back. Watch the teaser trailer above. Black Ops 7 will be set 40 years after the events of Black Ops 6, taking players to 2035 for a more futuristic experience. "Wielding cutting-edge technology, David Mason and his team must fight back against a manipulative enemy who weaponizes fear above all else," says the company. "The Black Ops universe is amazing. The creativity and imagination that goes into the storytelling, the rich character depth, and the incredible moment-to-moment gameplay across all modes is really exceptional," says Matt Cox, General Manager of Call of Duty. "As a team, our vision from the start was to create a back-to-back series experience for our players that embraced the uniqueness of the Black Ops sub-franchise." In another twist, the complete campaign will be playable in co-op in addition to offering solo play like usual. The story will follow a world that's on the brink of chaos, according to Treyarch, where violent conflicts and psychological warfare are rampant. Of course, a complete multiplayer portion with new maps and weapons, as well as another dose of round-based Zombies in the Dark Aether will be included in the package too. The complete reveal for Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 will be releasing later this year before the full launch The title is coming to PC, Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PlayStation 5, and PlayStation 4. Game Pass subscribers are gaining access on day one too.
    • Indiana Jones and the Great Circle: The Order of Giants DLC launches this September by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The Xbox Games Showcase gave a look at the next Indiana Jones adventure today. MachineGames showed up with a trailer for the first DLC pack coming to Indiana Jones and the Great Circle: The Order of Giants. Set in Italy, the fresh story will introduce new locations, puzzles, enemies and more. Watch the reveal trailer above. This Indy journey will be taking place during the main campaign and dive deeper into the tribe of giants, Nephilim Order, that players see in the base game. The story will kick off with Indiana Jones offering help to a young priest named Father Ricci, who is attempting to track down a mysterious artifact. The resulting journey expands into this separate storyline that takes the player beyond Vatican City to explore Rome's streets and the crypts beneath it. “One of the most satisfying parts of developing Indiana Jones and the Great Circle was the opportunity to create the Nephilim Order, the secret society of giants formed by descendants of fallen angels working to atone for their ancestral sins,” says Production Director John Jennings. “That story spans thousands of years and this DLC has given us the opportunity to develop further upon their lore and look at other aspects not covered in the initial story campaign. There’s something new and unexpected to tell here for fans of the game, and we can’t wait for people to be able to play it for themselves.” The Indiana Jones and the Great Circle: The Order of Giants DLC will be releasing on September 4, 2025. It will be available on PC, Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5. Premium Edition, Premium Upgrade, Collector’s Edition, and Collector’s Bundle owners will be receiving the DLC for no extra charge at launch.
    • Could we have a desktop version of this lightweight bloat free Windows 11?
    • So they admit that Windows 11 is slow and bloated. Good to know!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Epaminombas earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Veteran
      Yonah went up a rank
      Veteran
    • First Post
      viraltui earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      viraltui earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      LunaFerret earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      265
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      235
    4. 4
      snowy owl
      228
    5. 5
      Edouard
      174
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!