prevent users using remote desktop


Recommended Posts

  barteh said:
I've just tried this on an account in AD called 'Test' which isnt a member of the local admins or anything.

I ticked the deny box but RD still loads fine.

I've tried re-logging on a few times as that user, but to no avail.

Does anything else have to refresh?

Your saying it "loads fine". Do you mean to block the act of using mstsc.exe and connecting and logging on to remote computer? Or to block the mere mstsc.exe from even opening?

Again -- what exactly are the users doing that you want to stop? That setting in AD has nothing to do with them running the remote desktop client and connecting to some box running remote desktop, etc.

I am going to take a guess you have users using remote desktop to access machines outside your network to say surf the net, play solitare, etc..

Is this what your trying to stop?

As mentioned you could prevent them from running the exe on their machines -- but there are 3rd party remote desktop clients they could run. Or for that matter why does it have to be remote desktop - they could just vnc to boxes outside your network, etc..

The details of exactly what your users are doing that you want to stop would be most helpful for us to suggest ways to prevent them from doing it.

If the issue is users having remote control of PCs outside of your network then outgoing firewall policies will need to be put in place. But again, there are specific questions and answers needed.

^ and it does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that if you block outbound access on 3389, to just have the machine listen on another port -- say 80 or 443 for remote desktop connections.

Trying to block users from access to things outside of your control is a uphill battle to say the least, its like trying to block spam.. As soon as you block one thing, they figure out a new way to get it paste the filters, etc.

  BudMan said:
^ and it does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that if you block outbound access on 3389, to just have the machine listen on another port -- say 80 or 443 for remote desktop connections.

Trying to block users from access to things outside of your control is a uphill battle to say the least, its like trying to block spam.. As soon as you block one thing, they figure out a new way to get it paste the filters, etc.

Very true, it can get condeluded when talking about blocking outbound traffic. It is very easy to change the port RDP uses. It is of course still an option if he wanted to take that route.

Really the only options I see are:

1. Denying users from using Terminal Services via AD. Applies only in your environment.

2. Block all outbound traffic with the exception of legitimate ports. This could be very maintainence intensive and could get very condeluded, but could also work.

3. Block the mstsc.exe from ever executing in the first place. This would without a doubt stop RDP access regardless of what PC they are connecting to. However other forms of remote control could be used as stated using different ports.

So perhaps a combination of these could best suit you.

Sorry for the long delay.

I've blocked the terminal services in AD, several days on, this had made no difference.

We're using SBS2003, so dont have ISA server to have real control over outgoing ports etc.

Whats the easiest way to block the mstsc.exe in GPO?

I've never made any software restrictions before, so in simple terms would really help :)

  barteh said:
Sorry for the long delay.

I've blocked the terminal services in AD, several days on, this had made no difference.

We're using SBS2003, so dont have ISA server to have real control over outgoing ports etc.

Whats the easiest way to block the mstsc.exe in GPO?

I've never made any software restrictions before, so in simple terms would really help :)

If this is not working there's something wrong and I'd suggest you resolve it in case they work around the software restriction policy.

The Deny restriction applies to the user account that is being used to connect and not to the user launching the terminal services session, could that be the problem?

  barteh said:
i've gone to:

User Configuration\Administrative Templates\System

"dont run specified Windows applications" = enabled

and added: mstsc.exe

Doesn't that policy just compare a filename and/or its path to block the specified EXE? If so, couldn't a user just copy the file elsewhere (and/or rename it) and run it from there?

  bobbba said:
If this is not working there's something wrong and I'd suggest you resolve it in case they work around the software restriction policy.

The Deny restriction applies to the user account that is being used to connect and not to the user launching the terminal services session, could that be the problem?

quite possibly.

What your saying is:

So in AD i tick the deny box which says Bart cannot use Term Services, but so long as I log into another machine with a different account Its letting me?

I've tried the .exe i'll just wait and see what happens.

Scenario for how it works:

Admin creates AD account Bart2, default is allow term services

Admin edits AD account Bart1, deny term services

Bart1 logons on to pc1 opens mstc and attempts to remote desktop pc2

pc2 asks pc1 for a logon

bart specifies his logon (Bart1)

pc2 checks the ad to see whether Bart1 is allowed access, then denies him access

Bart1 tries again:

opens mstc and attempts to remote desktop pc2

pc2 asks pc1 for a logon

bart1 specifies Bart2

pc2 checks the ad to see whether Bart2 is allowed access, then allows him access

So basically the check is all about whether an account is allowed to complete a connection and logon to a remote desktop, not whether an account is allowed to attempt a connection.

If the accounts are setup properly, this should work perfectly well as the user won't know the credentials for other accounts so the restriction works. Restricting the exe and preventing them from launching the client is a really poor workaround except for when the computers they are trying to access are not within the organisation's control (like home pc's over the internet) which is when a firewall with outgoing control should be used.

Sorry bobba, I think I should have explained in more detail earlier.

The Machine the user is connecting to is a home machine.

And like I mentioned earlier, we dont have ISA so we dont have that sort of control, and the admins do use RDP ourselves, so I dont want to completely disable it.

Sounds like you need something like the following:

software restriction policy:

Block the filename of MSTSC

Block the hash values of the various versions of MSTSC

Prevent it from applying to local admins

(if your troublesome users don't have them, use GPO security filtering if they do)

Articles to help:

MS Howto

Tutorial

Those are the technical means of controlling it, the organisation should also have a computer/internet usage policy as well so that they have to consciously break the rules to do something like this and if they do a discipline procedure can be applied.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This was cool back in the day when done properly - loved having icons of specific devices.
    • Microsoft quietly burying a massive Windows 7 hardware driver feature as Windows 11 kills it by Sayan Sen Last month Microsoft announced a big update for Windows hardware drivers. The company declared that it was killing Windows Device metadata and the Windows Metadata and Internet Services (WMIS). For those wondering what it is, device metadata, as the name suggests, is the collection of additional, user-facing information that an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) provides about a hardware device. The feature was introduced with Windows 7 and can include stuff like icons, logos, descriptive texts, among other things, that help the Windows UI display details about such devices in places like Task Manager or Device Manager. This was a huge deal back in the day when Windows 7 debuted. The company called the feature "Device Stage" and Microsoft described it as a "new visual interface" that essentially worked like a "multi-function version of Autoplay where it displays all the applications, services, and information related to your device." It is often considered synonymous with the Windows "Devices and Printers" Control Panel applet. Neowin did an in-depth overview of the feature when it first launched which you can find in its dedicated article here. The Windows OS was able to obtain the device experience metadata from the WMIS, but now that the feature is being deprecated, Microsoft has begun removing information about Device Stage from its official support documents. Neowin noticed while browsing that a support article regarding automatic Windows hardware drivers was updated for Windows 11 and 10 sometime last year after the release of Windows 11 24H2. Previously, this article was geared for Windows 7 and was much longer. It also contained information about Device Stage, which, as mentioned above, was a headlining feature on Windows 7. In the said article, the section "If Windows can't find information about your device in Device Stage" has been deleted. You can find the archived version of the support page here. Aside from shortening the amount of information on the page, Microsoft has also added some more details on it. The company has now tried to define what the Microsoft Basic Display Adapter is, how updating drivers through Device Manager works, as well as a thorough and detailed troubleshooting section for common hardware driver errors on Windows, including one for USB-C. You can find all the new details on the updated support page here on Microsoft's website.
    • Sounds creepy to say the least. Don't need nor want AI having access to my history. They're claiming it to be an "offline" model now, but how can we guarantee they don't go behind our backs and change that?
    • Exactly! Without those fundamentals you've mentioned, Democracy is literally just Demonstration of Crazy, nothing to be proud of in such system.
    • Still I see almost no ads in mobile Edge unlike Chrome. So their browser is much better at blocking ads than Chrome and it is a fact. It even blocks ads on YouTube and you can add simple custom block filters. Also, Edge still support manifest v2 on desktop, so I'll look for another browser when I start seeing ads again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      viraltui earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      viraltui earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      LunaFerret earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Ricky Chan earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      maimutza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      481
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      264
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      238
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      234
    5. 5
      Edouard
      176
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!