[Official] Too Human


Recommended Posts

I've always had an eye on this game, but I guess my main question is on how long it is gameplay wise? This might sound silly or not but length means the difference between buying it at 70Euros (I live in the EU) or waiting for it to drop lower etc.

I've always had an eye on this game, but I guess my main question is on how long it is gameplay wise? This might sound silly or not but length means the difference between buying it at 70Euros (I live in the EU) or waiting for it to drop lower etc.

i think i read somewhere that it'll take around 15 hours or so.

Because..

<snip>

That Frodo guy was right all along :laugh:

What the hell was that video? And I'm sure I saw that kid with the pink wig walking around Liverpool a month or so ago, in the exact same costume with that bloke the pirate but he was dressed in a jump suit thing, there was another bloke too with a weird 'tache with them. All the kids seemed to rave over them and follow them everywhere.

Ok so back on topic Mr Grouch :p

Megacritic rating 68

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/toohuman

Gamerankings:

TeamXbox 6.5 out of 10 65.0%

IGN 7.8 out of 10 78.0%

GameSpot 5.5 out of 10 55.0%

OXM 6.5 out of 10 65.0%

Game Informer 6.75 out of 10 67.5%

GameSpy 2.5 out of 5 50.0%

Worth Playing 6 out of 10 60.0%

Eurogamer 6 out of 10 60.0%

VideoGamer 7 out of 10 70.0%

1UP C- 60.0%

http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/928546.asp

Too Human UK Review

Actually there's very little humanity to this long-delayed action-RPG. Fortunately it does have thousands of exploding robots.

by Alec Meer, IGN UK

UK, August 19, 2008 - Is it possible to recommend, in good conscience, a game that only really becomes enjoyable after around 10 hours? It'd be like forcing a first-time Star Wars viewer to sit through all six films, reassuring them as they squirmed miserably through the prequels that honestly, good stuff is coming, if they can only survive another few hours of Hayden Christiansen's single facial expression.

After nine years in development -- it was originally planned for PS1 -- it's genuinely startling that Too Human has such a fractured understanding of what is and isn't enjoyable. An action-RPG in the kill-to-loot-to kill-to-loot-to-kill (and so on) vein of Diablo, but with combat a little more akin to something like God of War, it's a game clearly built for instant gratification. You're up against hordes of robots (and, later, zombies): killing them in their droves is what you've signed up for. Yet Too Human does everything it can think of to keep you from doing this. But you will have a good time, because underneath the bewildering slew of cheerless obstacles there's a game that does fundamentally achieve its major goal, especially in co-op play.

too-human-20080819065630312-000.jpg

First though, a little context, as while superficially yet another game about power-armoured future-soldiers with big guns, Too Human actually picks itself a fascinating setting. It's not, it must be noted, anything whatsoever with being too human or not human enough, as the name's a hangover from the game's original plot, about a bloke tussling with whether or not to cybernetically upgrade himself. For Too Human 2008, you're playing as Norse god Baldur, reimagined as a sci-fi warrior and with the traditional RPG foes of goblins, dark elves and trolls now towering machine-monsters. It's a great concept to play around with, and some of the game's almost comically massive architecture reflects this. The plot strives gamely to tell a number of Norse legends within this tech-fantasy context, to the point that its major twist is eminently guessable if you're relatively familiar with the tales of Thor, Loki et al.

For all the inherent silliness, it plays it perfectly straight -- which would be entirely the right decision if only it was a little more brief about it. Instead, it's exposition-heavy cutscene after poorly-characterised cutscene, so droning that it often lapses into incoherency. Some are skippable, others aren't, even when you're seeing them second or third time around. The idea is playful, but the execution depressingly clumsy. There's something of Halo 2/3 to it -- all macho posturing and oh-so-serious, but worst of all the presumption that this is the first part of a trilogy. It even says as much on the back of the box, and a result of this arrogance you don't even get to battle the game's main antagonist, instead getting fobbed off with a particularly grindy boss fight against one of his minions. All that talking, all that teasing and yet it all goes so unresolved.

Which is why what happens after the end of the 10 hour or so campaign works so much better. You can replay any section of the game in any order you wish, with a slightly different selection of baddies than before and with most of the tiresome cutscenes ripped out. With the story, such as it is, out of the way, there's so much less standing in between your giant hammer and a 20-foot robot's face. With your character at around level 30 and a ton of powerful kit equipped, by this point you'll also understand the game's (very poorly-explained) combat mechanics an awful lot better, transforming it from flustered button-mashing and routine death into an artful ballet of carnage.

Your melee attacks are activated with the right-stick, which takes some getting used to as your natural impulse will likely be to manoeuvre the camera with it. The camera's actually auto-managed, and is comically awful, often wheeling around to face you or forcing an extreme zoom-out without warning. The right-stick, meanwhile, activates slide and launch attacks depending on how you push it, and with a relatively tiny degree of mastery you can be pinballing between a dozen Goblins without taking a hit. Which, as well as feeling cool as all hell, helps you build up powerful combo powers -- specifically, the devastating area-of-effect Ruiners and a Spider ability that differs depending on your class and skill point allocation, from a meaty attack or a heal power.

too-human-20080819065626984-000.jpg

The different player classes don't offer a huge amount of difference, as in any case your combat options amount to stab or shoot. The Spider powers offer group-focused bonuses, but as the co-op play was dropped a while back from four to just two players, these don't make much practical difference in terms of forming an effective party. So really the character choice is about whether you'd rather kill with strong, slow weapons or weaker, faster weapons. Some characters are, however, better with guns than at melee, and that's where the co-op system does work well -- you'll have one guy at the front thumping everything into pieces and the other hanging back and softening 'em up with his pistols, rifle or cannon. The guns work fine in that sort of situation, but less so when you're playing solo, as aiming them at a specific target is, while possible, supremely fiddly. A minute twitch of the thumbstick can suddenly have you pointing 180 degrees in the wrong direction, and while you struggle to right yourself you'll doubtless be swamped by enemies, rendering long-range combat academic.

Continues..

Apologies, I suppose I should have asked Andy in PM what the video was :)

I was going to post about Too Human too but seeing that video reminded me of seeing that kid and two blokes dressed weirdly here :)

Whilst I didnt really like the demo as such, I am willing to give it another go, as it feels a lot like Hellgate, which I loved. Once again if I can get the dosh I may give this a try. Plus as mentioned in another thread one of my mates from MS worked on the game, in an advisory capacity.

From what I am told they are going to be producing two more games in the series.

I've always had an eye on this game, but I guess my main question is on how long it is gameplay wise? This might sound silly or not but length means the difference between buying it at 70Euros (I live in the EU) or waiting for it to drop lower etc.

I'm halfway through the third out of four levels, and roughly sitting at 8 and half hours.

What do you think mate??

I'm unsure, as I've seen very conflicting reviews. However I'd rather take a Neowinians review than some biased review site :)

I love it. It's very simple to understand everything about it. The combat system takes the length of the demo to learn, maybe two levels to master (all advance moves). The item system is pretty self-explantory and really easy to use (easiest i've used in awhile). It's really short, though the levels are long (roughly 2 hours and some change for each). It's defiently a grinding game, which I personally enjoy. Story is so-so, awkard at times and nothing OMG like, but I enjoy it.

Is it fair to bring the thread off-topic like this?

I only asked that flames be kept out or you would be warned. It's up to the staff at Neowin to determine if off-topic posts are spam and/or unwarranted in the said thread.

4 Player co-op would've been better than the current 2. It's a shame they dropped to 2!

Haven't had a chance to do Co-op, want to finish it SP first, but the way it's set-up with levels scaling with your level, I think 4 would have made it to easy. Now if they had modes like Kingdon Under Fire: Circle of Doom, that'd be different. But I can't deny getting four people together does sound helluva fun.

My only gripe with it is targetting. I like the combat system and using the right analog stick, just wish you would use one of the triggers to switch between targets or something. It's hard trying to pick up a goblin, when there's a huge ass troll in your face.

And for that matter, goblins are so easy it's not even funny. Seriously these guys die in one to two hits no matter what weapon you have.

Dark Elves are pains in the asses. Maybe it's because I'm playing a pure melee class, but these guys are insane at ranged dps, and when you get in close they deal just as much if not more damage than they do at ranged (did I mention they fire nearly non-stop). Maybe with a class built to be better at ranged, or maybe when I get better at the game, these guys won't cause much trouble. But as it stands there annoying, and are the most popular enemy you have to fight.

Trolls are easy, shoot/melee there armor off (I find shooting easier, longer, but easier) then once you can jump on there back and stab them through the head. :)

All the bosses involve some sort of challenge. First one was avoiding his minions, second one was destroying the platforms while he shoot grenades at ya, and so far the third one is a heavily armoed troll, that i've been fighting for 10 minutes now.

And one last thing, either I suck really, really, really, bad or this game was built to have dying a regular thing. I'm at like 60 deaths and the end of third level. :(

I've always had an eye on this game, but I guess my main question is on how long it is gameplay wise? This might sound silly or not but length means the difference between buying it at 70Euros (I live in the EU) or waiting for it to drop lower etc.

Ebay.

You've completed it already? o.o

Ya, seems Berserker isn't meant to fight ranged very well. Those damn Dark Elves messed me up pretty bad. And in the last level, it seems like your squad members die they come back as undead, so you have to fight them also. Well I died with 6 squad members and a big floating elite dude, so instead of 20 guys plus an elite I had 26 plus and elite. Died about 20 times until I can clear that out, since everytime I died my squad members would die, turning undead and upping the anty. Though once I killed the big elite, they stopped, so maybe that guy brought back the dead? I dunno, there's no source of health in the game over than sparcly dropped health orbs and leveling. No passive regen when in/not-in combat. And if your posion, HA! just let it kill you or take out as many as you can before it ticks your life away.

Just realized you were asking about the game. Yes, 14 and half hours to complete it all. Only 4 levels, all very long.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      574
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!