Stargate Universe (Season 1)


Poll added by Fred Derf on April 10th  

157 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should lead on Destiny?



Recommended Posts

Every time it jumps it only moves by maybe 5-10 gates. The ships in SG-1 and Atlantis seemed to be able to make it almost anywhere in the galaxy in a few hours.

I think they went through way more gates than they showed. If they were spending like 10 minutes per gate, and Destiny's typical stop is 12-16 hours, I think they went pretty far to get back to the gate where Rush was left behind. You have to recall that "mysteriously placed solar system" in the middle.

The title though is mysterious. 'Sabotoge'.

Loved the last episode. Greer is definitely one of my favourites, they did some great character building for him during that episode. Lots of suspense, I was so sure they were about to make it back then Rush casually strolls in. Really looking forward to the next episode.

One thing I was wondering about, what was Rush looking for, certainly not the lost crew. He seemed to ignore everyone and was fixated on finding something. As for Chloe becoming a genius, meh, they had to do something with her character. As for getting back, I'm going to go with HawkMan on this one. They'll likely return to the crashed ship, either somehow make it work, or more likely, trigger the aliens to return and kidnap them once again. While it isn't the most original way to have them make it back, it makes sense. Then again, I didn't expect the events of the last episode to play out as they did so maybe they will throw us a curve ball. I'd be shocked if they didn't make it back in the next episode. Only 5 more left, you'd think they'd want the full cast together for the last few. Stargate usually ends with a cliffhanger finale, but I'd love it if they had closure in the finale. Then start Season 2 more or less fresh, instead of picking up where Season 1 ended.

I think the reason Chloe now seems smarter is because of the alien abduction. Might be some "side effects" of the mind device. Which would make sense of her ability to know alien symbols.

Well, they could also return to the planet with the giant alien pillar and the broken shuttle. That could have some potential for them to get back to Destiny and it wouldn't be as predictable as using the same method as Rush.

Also, they finally explained how the gate system works. I was wondering why they could only dial 5 or so gates instead of all the gates in the galaxy. Also, the destiny seems to be moving a lot slower than I had imagined. Every time it jumps it only moves by maybe 5-10 gates. The ships in SG-1 and Atlantis seemed to be able to make it almost anywhere in the galaxy in a few hours.

I think they will return to the planet. The question will be if there are anyone left there? Or if something have visited. The obelisk sent a signal, to somewhere.

Destiny is using FTL drives. which is a lot slower than the hyperdrive engines of the ships in SG1 and Atlantis.?

^ Glad you liked it, only 5 more weeks. Going to get better and better!

I think the reason Chloe now seems smarter is because of the alien abduction. Might be some "side effects" of the mind device. Which would make sense of her ability to know alien symbols.

I think they will return to the planet. The question will be if there are anyone left there? Or if something have visited. The obelisk sent a signal, to somewhere.

Destiny is using FTL drives. which is a lot slower than the hyperdrive engines of the ships in SG1 and Atlantis.

Good point about Chloe, didn't think of that but it makes much more sense about how its in her subconscious. It's probably those same blue aliens that made the solar system but I'd like to see another race. Now that you mention FTL drive how the hell do they expect to jump galaxies. It'd take a lifetime at those speeds.

I think the reason Chloe now seems smarter is because of the alien abduction. Might be some "side effects" of the mind device. Which would make sense of her ability to know alien symbols.

I think they will return to the planet. The question will be if there are anyone left there? Or if something have visited. The obelisk sent a signal, to somewhere.

Destiny is using FTL drives. which is a lot slower than the hyperdrive engines of the ships in SG1 and Atlantis.?

They can't return to the planet with the obelisk. There is no stargate there, since the planet came into existence after the first ships (that make the stargates) passed by.

. Now that you mention FTL drive how the hell do they expect to jump galaxies. It'd take a lifetime at those speeds.

Like they said, might be the reason for the power saving onboard Destiny.

They can't return to the planet with the obelisk. There is no stargate there, since the planet came into existence after the first ships (that make the stargates) passed by.

They still have a shuttle left. And who knows, there are other means of getting too and from somewhere on Destiny.

As for chloe knowing what to look for, the symbol for destiny is very clearly on that panel, you see it over and over again. She may indeed know something or the pictograph caught her eye.

Might be. But this beeing Stargate I think there is more to it.

Like they said, might be the reason for the power saving onboard Destiny.

They still have a shuttle left. And who knows, there are other means of getting too and from somewhere on Destiny.

Might be. But this being Stargate I think there is more to it.

Oh, I thought you were talking about Chloe, Eli, and Scott. Still, the Destiny would have to turn around in order for the shuttle to be able to take them down to the planet again, since the shuttle's range would be severely limited.

I almost wonder if the Destiny has an early version of a Hyperdrive that has massive power requirements, otherwise, I agree, it simply could take too long in normal FTL.

As for the Chloe thing, I think there's more to it. Eli certainly did not recognize the symbol and of anybody there he should have.

I was thinking about this: I think when they're IN a galaxy it uses FTL because if it was in subspace, it might not be able to accurately track it's own location (keep in mind this is an old ancient ship, better tech for navigation might not have been out). According to the first episode it has travelled billions of light years and it certainly stopped in MANY galaxies (each point on the map was a galaxy, but they didn't say how many points there were). So I'm thinking maybe it just uses hyperdrive to go between galaxies and FTL while in the galaxy

You could see it used FTL at the end of the episode. And they where at the and of the galaxy.

I think two scenarios will most likely happen:

1. The ship doesn't calculate the human power usage and drops out of FTL too early

2. The crew manage to take control of destiny and starts to fly be them self. Maybe also finding the way back. But Destiny probably will need a refill before that.

@+x-byte: I hadn't noticed they went into FTL at the end of the episode. I don't know then *shrug*

Honestly, I think the fact we CAN speculate and be excited to learn what's going on in the show is fantastic to me. This show has completely captured my heart so far and I hope it continues to.

@+x-byte: I hadn't noticed they went into FTL at the end of the episode. I don't know then *shrug*

Honestly, I think the fact we CAN speculate and be excited to learn what's going on in the show is fantastic to me. This show has completely captured my heart so far and I hope it continues to.

I'm loving the show, it's so different from SG1 and Atlantis, it's much more grittier, more Battlestar-esque!

What I feel is the different is that SG1 and Atlantis is easier to get into. It's more shallow and we don't see much of the characters personal life. But Universe is a bit slower and can get a little harder to get into. But the reward is a better connection to the characters. And the story is paced better imo. Not that I don't like SG1 and Atlantis. Universe just feels more real and down to earth.

On the music side though there is another story. The OST for Universe is simply put brilliant.I have had chills at a few scenes because of that. Especially in the episode Air, where Eli had to keep his hand in the event horizon. And lets not forget the episode Water. I have to have this in my collection!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!