CPU Upgrade to support Virtualization?


Recommended Posts

Ok, currently I have an Intel Core 2 Duo (E4600) does not support Intel "Virtualization Technology".

I have an ASUS P5B SE motherboard, but not sure of two things:

  1. What other (inexpensive!) CPU could I buy as a replacement that would support VT, plus be compatible with my MB
  2. Would the VT support make a noticable difference?

On item #2, I use Linux and KVM, and I currently get a message telling me that my hardware doesn't support hardware acceleration. I assume that using a VT-enabled CPU would permit the kernel-based virtualization that I am seeking. However, I am really not going to be excited if I buy a new CPU and find that I spent money and don't get a significant speed boost in a virtual machine.

Any of you Neowin hardware gurus (which I am not!) have some insight, particularly when it comes to CPUs with VT technology?

I believe VT support is only good for VMWare and stuff like that where you see a difference, I run it often on my Intel E6750 chip and runs well.

Aside from that I don't see why you would need to have VT support unless you use that.

You could buy the 6750 chip, or something better as your board does support 45nm/1333mhz fsb chips :)

http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?modelmen...l3=307&l4=0

Here you can see a list of processors under 45nm and using 1333mhz, those will work on your board, but make sure you have the latest BIOS juts to make sure it has the updated info to support the newest chips.

http://www.intel.com/products/processor_nu...rt/core2duo.htm

I also see your in the US, I don't know any local stores but http://www.newegg.com is really good for cheap computer stuff.

Mark, you have the Intel 965 chipset. That means you're very limited to what CPU you can use. You need to have a Core 2 Duo, 65nm, 1066 FSB max. You chipset does not support a quad core... none that I've seen anyway.

I've been looking on NewEgg and can't find a CPU for you. You might want to think about going to at least a P35 or is you can, a P45. You'll have a much better upgrade path in the future.

Edit. This is your best bet. Here

2.) it depends. I have it enabled in Virtualbox in all VMs unless it causes specific issues (FreeBSD and its derivatives seem to puke with it enabled)

*however*

According to the Virtualbox developers faq;

  Quote
* Q: Does VirtualBox support CPU virtualization enhancements such as Intel VT-x (codename Vanderpool) and AMD SVM?

A: Yes, we provide full support for Intel VT-x and experimental support for AMD SVM. However, we do not make use of these features by default. You have to enable it either globally or on a per VM basis. The reason is very simple: our x86 virtualization is very sophisticated and in most cases it provides significantly better performance than when relying on VT-x. Virtualization products that rely on VT-x are usually much less sophisticated and tuned. With VT-x, a special CPU environment has to be entered in order to execute guest code and whenever activity of the VMM is required, this environment has to be left and then entered again. This is painfully slow and will take some years until additional benefits of VT-x and SVM (such as nested paging) may outweigh the performance penalty. VirtualBox will continue to support the latest CPU enhancements and already today, you benefit from VT-x when running guest operating systems such as OS/2 Warp which need rarely-used processor features. In general, with VT-x enabled much less virtualization code from VirtualBox has to be executed which can result in a more reliable system in case there are problems. So if you run into an issue, we recommend to compare the results to a VT-x enabled VM.

In practice, I see little difference between having it enabled and not, honestly. The only applications I've really tested were Virtualbox and vmware, so YMMV depending on what software you intend to use.

Yuck, so it sounds like this VT hardware acceleration isn't all that beneficial to begin with.

I'm using Virtualbox at the moment with the full software emulated virtual machine, but thought that a switch to the Linux KVM with possible hardware acceleration would be significantly faster. It sounds quite likely that the difference may not be noticeable. Maybe I could measure it in benchmarks, but not really see a practical benefit that would make it worth a CPU purchase on a fairly new machine.

Thanks for the advice, and saving me from a bit of disappointment! (Y)

Well to be honest, we only use processors with VT-extensions to run Windows VM's at work.

That does make a difference.

For linux I use Xen's paravirtualisation technologies.

I've used linux in vmware before and I can't say its as demanding as Windows in a VM.

Therefor I don't think you'll benefit that much from a new cpu (ofc I don't know what you are going to do in the vm).

^^^ Yeah, in Linux, Xen and KVM seem to be the two hot technologies in this field. Fedora/RedHat seems to favor Xen, and Ubuntu (my current distro) seems to favor KVM.

In any regards, my application is simple: testing & minor development work for Shift Linux on my Linux box. So, Linux host and Linux guest. No fancy server stuff, and no real connection between the host & guest are required. Pretty basic, I would think.

It seems that it would not be worth the money to buy a new CPU for this (and not like I have another compatible PC to throw my existing Core2Duo into to provide a two-PC upgrade - which would make this upgrade a bit more palatable).

I appreciate everyone's advice on this, and it certainly seems that "not worth the cost and effort" is the theme. Now, if I had this in mind when I was buying the PC, I would have gone with a VT-enabled CPU, as it would not have been any extra effort or waste for me, and maybe just a slight cost difference to get this feature.

Ahhhh... hindsight is always 20/20, isn't it?

On topic of virtualization, I have a question. I have an AMD Turion (single core) that doesn't support this, yet I notice no difference when running VM apps. I run a VM on a daily basis, I usually run a VM of Vista on an XP host. What exactly does this virtualization technology do in processors?

  tsupersonic said:
On topic of virtualization, I have a question. I have an AMD Turion (single core) that doesn't support this, yet I notice no difference when running VM apps. I run a VM on a daily basis, I usually run a VM of Vista on an XP host. What exactly does this virtualization technology do in processors?

lowering VM IO overhead i suppose ?

  tsupersonic said:
On topic of virtualization, I have a question. I have an AMD Turion (single core) that doesn't support this, yet I notice no difference when running VM apps. I run a VM on a daily basis, I usually run a VM of Vista on an XP host. What exactly does this virtualization technology do in processors?

Near as I can figure, it allows a host to give a guest more direct access to hardware, which should increase speed in theory, since less software virtualization would have to be done.

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_virtualization

Yeah I tried a VM of Vista on a Core 2 Duo E8300 (or E8400) and it supports the IVT, and I noticed no difference between the Core 2 and my laptop, so I was kind of confused; I thought it would be faster on the Core 2.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I enjoy using Discover Weekly. I have found new music using it. Just sometimes it goes off the rails and doesn't remember I don't like rap. I'm not sure this update is anything helpful, but I guess I'll try it if it comes to free accounts.
    • Yep, I got 250 mbps down / 50 mbps up on Qatar last week and about a 30 ms ping.
    • Here are all the new features added to Microsoft 365 Copilot in June 2025 by Usama Jawad Towards the end of each month, Microsoft publishes a roundup of the features that it added to some of its popular software in the previous four weeks. We have already talked about the new capabilities introduced in Excel and Teams during the month of June 2025, and now, it's time to talk about Microsoft 365 Copilot. We'll start off with admin-facing capabilities since there are only a few of them. For starters, the usage metrics for Copilot in the Copilot Analytics tool now have new prompt categories that give more insights as to how users are engaging with Copilot. This feature has just begun rolling out, but another enhancement to the usage metrics that is already available is dedicated statistics for intelligent meeting recaps. Finally, Microsoft 365 admins can now view and manage their inventory of agents and connectors and also have more granular control over costs and billing policies. On the user side of things, we have intelligent assistance in Copilot Chat, powered by ContextIQ. This layer of intelligence can scope prompts to internal (SharePoint, OneDrive) and external data sources, find files in the chat, and proactively offer relevant suggestions as you type. In the same vein, the Copilot mobile app is being updated so you can talk to the AI in a natural manner using your voice. In addition, users can also get access to deep reasoning agents such as Researcher and Analyst for more complex and research-oriented needs. The Create experience in the app is also being updated with the ability to generate stories and branded templates. Other interesting Copilot capabilities rolling out to Edge customers are the ability to prompt the AI through the search bar, access agents from within the browser, and take advantage of Copilot's impressive text summarization capabilities. That's not all though, other features in tow include: Enhancements to Copilot in Outlook: Schedule meetings through Copilot chat, summarization of email attachments, a new sidebar experience in the classic Outlook app, meeting preparation, and automated meeting invite creation Improved image generation and large file handling in Copilot Chat: More photorealistic image generation with better text depiction, ability to generate longer summaries from bigger files, and PDF scanning capabilities for insights Memory in Copilot: Copilot will now remember certain items from your conversation and you can modify or delete them Transferred calls summary with Copilot in Teams Phone: Generate a summary of a call and transfer it to a target New file extension for Copilot Pages: Copilot Pages will now have .page extension with an updated file icon Copilot Notebooks availability in OneNote: We already covered this in detail here Seamlessly add brand-approved images with Copilot in PowerPoint: Integration of Copilot with SharePoint Organization Asset Library (OAL) and Templafy asset libraries Explain formulas on the grid with Copilot in Excel: Self-explanatory, exactly what it says on the tin Expanded availability for the Microsoft 365 Copilot app: Availability of the Microsoft 365 Copilot app on Mac You can read more details about each of the aforementioned features here.
    • Damn, I blocked OldGuru a long time ago and you have to go and quote them so I have to read that creepy a$$ take. LOL Anyway 100% that dude can't find women that will have sex with him.
    • OneNote for Windows gets support for Dynamic DPI by Usama Jawad OneNote for Windows (part of Microsoft 365) is a pretty useful app if you're actively engaged in note-taking activities and also appreciate some rich text formatting capabilities. In fact, it also offers some decent integrations with Copilot, which make it an important piece of software in productivity-based environments. Now, Microsoft has introduced a feature that will likely make people with multi-monitor setups very happy. The OneNote for Windows application now supports Dynamic DPI (dots per inch). What this means is that you can use OneNote across any screen and it will scale according to the display's resolution, and you won't get a disconcerting and distracting blurring effect. You can extend your display to a high-resolution monitor and shift OneNote across displays without a hitch or any distraction. This is similar to the UX that is already present in Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. This Dynamic DPI support not only extends to the main text area but also to the section tabs, the Notebooks pane, drop-down menus, and Copilot Notebooks. All of these should look crisp and polished moving forward, without any manual adjustment or even an app restart required from the user's side. Microsoft has highlighted that it was encouraged to work on this capability after receiving user feedback from customers in this area. Dynamic DPI is now available to Current Channel (CC) customers on OneNote for Windows, running Version 2504 (Build 16.0.18827.20042) or later. That's not all, though. Another smaller enhancement present in OneNote moving forward is a revamped setup experience when you launch OneNote on a new Windows device for the first time. You will now receive a list of your five most recently used (MRU) notebooks that will open instantaneusly with a click. If you have more than five notebooks, you can pick and choose the files that you want to open. That said, Microsoft is looking to expand and improve on this experience in the future since it is fairly limited right now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      dennis Nebeker earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      timothytoots earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      TIGOSS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      henryj earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      194
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      163
    4. 4
      Xenon
      78
    5. 5
      Som
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!