Recommended Posts

Hi everyone i'm having a problem here. One of my team member is leaving and the management wants all the wireless access point WEB key changed so that the ex-team mate will not be able to do any harmful thing to the organization. This organization is using a lot a lot of APs. 20 branches and each branches is using around 15 APs.

My initial thinking is that to set up a router in between so that i can filter out all the MAC address that i don't want. I than realized that the MAC address filtering is only available for wireless devices. Devices that use network cable will not work.

Changing of AP's WEB key extremely uncomfortable for me as there are too many APs. Anyone can come out with something easier? Thanks a million.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/661696-managing-access-points/
Share on other sites

So your saying each accesspoint is stand alone, and has its own password to access your network? Yeah thats fine for 1 or 2 in a ma and pa shop.. You say you have like 20 x 15 = 300 of them..

As mentioned Cisco makes a great wireless controller. What type of access points are they?

I would assume they support radius, which would be a central form of auth, and yes would remove your issue of having to change something on all 300 of them.

they are d-link AP2000 and dlink ap2100. WEB key and SSID must be set in every AP in order for the AP to work, they are all in the same network. is my initial thinking making any sense? Any router can achieve that?(filtering MAC address for wired network? Why radius network work? is it because of shorter coverage? Any solution or suggestion is well come thank a million again.

When you say "WEB" do you mean WEP or WPA -- what is a WEB key?? Are they running some hotspot type portal that users auth too?

Or do the users just use the WEP or WPA preshared key? Thats crazy with more than a couple of APs.. You need to set them up to use a enterprise type solution, ie Radius to auth to your AD or central userbase. So every user's account would be used to auth to your wireless network.

This way when an employee leaves, you just disable their account and they no longer have access to your wireless network. So your what changing your wireless security every time an employee leaves or gets let go? On 300 APs? Thats nuts.

How did ever get to be that many?? Once you hit more than a handful a better way should of been looked into ;)

Not sure what your wanting to do with mac filtering -- your going to filter on mac for every single user machine that might connect to your wireless network? Other than being an logistics nightmare, mac filtering is not a form of security - control yes, security NO!

From a quick look at the product page of the AP2100 it states it supports SNMP management. Then would be your best best for changing all of their settings without having to connect to every single AP interface..

SNMP Management;

The DWL-2100AP is not only fast but it also supports SNMP v.3

for better network management. A Wireless AP Manager software

is available with the DWL-2100AP for network confguration

and frmware upgrades via a web-based confguration utility.

For Enterprise networks, the DWL-2100AP supports network

administration and real-time network traffc monitoring via D-Link?s

D-View Network Management software.

I took a quick look at the emulator, and the 2100 shows a WPA or WPA2-EAP mode, to allow pointing to a radius server to auth your users. I would look into the snmp management features of those devices, and then change them to auth your users to your radius server.. In the windows word you can can use IAS http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/network/bb643123.aspx , or you could always just setup FreeRadius. http://freeradius.org/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      557
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!