Rumour: First PS3 firmware 2.5 details


Recommended Posts

Because the likelyhood is that the PS3 controller works independently of the PS3 and is a BT device, maybe you can't send a 'kill' signal to it.

The controllers will turn off automatically if you shut down the PS3 so they should be able to impliment something.

Isn't that already there? My controller has turned itself off a few times before when left alone for a short while. It isn't low on charge, BTW! :D

I've mentioned that before in these forums, a friend of mine has a JAP 60GB and his controllers power off automatically.

Would be much better than taking screen shots.

But I think Sony just have other priorities, think they gave this feature a back-seat for now.

Yeah, it took them months just to let you update the firmware without having to pair a controller, or navigate the XMB with the analog. They must be busy making couches and other virtual furniture.

I don't suppose there's anyway to get optical and hdmi outputs working at the same time correct? I have no receiver. I just want my TV speakers to have sound too.

Sure there is, as that is how my setup is, HDMI for the Video, Optical for the Audio.

I believe you just choose each setting as such in the settings and you are good to go.

Sure there is, as that is how my setup is, HDMI for the Video, Optical for the Audio.

I believe you just choose each setting as such in the settings and you are good to go.

Isnt optical supposed to be of lower quality than what HDMi 1.3 carries?

I looked into this, but read that HDMI was actually better quality.

Then a battery charge doesn't last long.
Something wrong. I've sat and played COD4 for 3 or 4 hours straight once or twice and it never even got below 2 of 3 little blocks. Mine holds for seemingly a long time, unlike I found with the xbox 360 controllers. Anyways, I'd also like to have the ability to press the PS button when a message is received and have it bring you directly to the message.
Sorry about my unclear question.

Can I use HDMI and optical for audio at the same time? My 5.1 speakers use optical, and I want my TV to have sound through HDMI

I do not believe so, you have to choose the output setting and you can only select one.

For the above posters questioning which is better to use.... unless you have a receiver that is capable of receiving the 5.1 audio via HDMI, you are better off using optical for 5.1 surround.

Isnt optical supposed to be of lower quality than what HDMi 1.3 carries?

I looked into this, but read that HDMI was actually better quality.

Yep, its better to be using HDMI then using the Optical. There is a level of quality loss when using an optical cable versus a HDMI cable.

My battery lasts atleast 8-10 hours...

I do not believe so, you have to choose the output setting and you can only select one.

For the above posters questioning which is better to use.... unless you have a receiver that is capable of receiving the 5.1 audio via HDMI, you are better off using optical for 5.1 surround.

What jerzdawg said. My receiver was nothing super fancy, so for the 5.1 Digital Dolby, I need to use Optical. And I will tell you what, it sounds pretty damn good to me either way.

What jerzdawg said. My receiver was nothing super fancy, so for the 5.1 Digital Dolby, I need to use Optical. And I will tell you what, it sounds pretty damn good to me either way.

I forgot to tell you DL.. I finally picked up a new receiver... this one can accept the digital audio via HDMI so I have been able to hear the dolby true hd and dtshd or whatever they call it for bluray, it def sounds great... but I still don't know if it is due to that or that it was an upgrade from my aging sony receiver...

I forgot to tell you DL.. I finally picked up a new receiver... this one can accept the digital audio via HDMI so I have been able to hear the dolby true hd and dtshd or whatever they call it for bluray, it def sounds great... but I still don't know if it is due to that or that it was an upgrade from my aging sony receiver...

Nice. I gotta check it out one day and see if I can hear the difference.

The only thing I can really notice is a lot of newer games are actually made in Dolby Digital, where even games released earlier this year were not, so the new games it does make a big difference in the sound.

Nice. I gotta check it out one day and see if I can hear the difference.

The only thing I can really notice is a lot of newer games are actually made in Dolby Digital, where even games released earlier this year were not, so the new games it does make a big difference in the sound.

hmm... perhaps our resident ps3 expert AB can answer this.... is there any plans for a game to be released with the audio formats such as TrueHD or DTS-HD ..

hmm... perhaps our resident ps3 expert AB can answer this.... is there any plans for a game to be released with the audio formats such as TrueHD or DTS-HD ..

MGS4, Uncharted, and R:FoM were PCM 7.1, according to a couple posts on Blu-ray.com.

I remember Kojima saying they were using PCM 7.1 a long time ago, tho, so I know that holds up.

MGS4, Uncharted, and R:FoM were PCM 7.1, according to a couple posts on Blu-ray.com.

I remember Kojima saying they were using PCM 7.1 a long time ago, tho, so I know that holds up.

nice... i only have mgs4... but I would like to see if there is any difference at all ... thanks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So its a museum of AI prompts? Boring
    • This one baffles me...so they are creating a museum based around the Ship of Theseus? A museum is supposed to preserve things. It doesn't really work if the conversation goes, "I gazed upon Starry Night the other day, the colours were beautiful!" "Yeah...I didn't expect Godzilla to show up, though." Create a building devoted to displaying AI work, fine. The rainforest idea sounds interesting and I would consider visiting if they pay me a few bucks. But don't call it a museum...
    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!