Rumour: First PS3 firmware 2.5 details


Recommended Posts

Because the likelyhood is that the PS3 controller works independently of the PS3 and is a BT device, maybe you can't send a 'kill' signal to it.

The controllers will turn off automatically if you shut down the PS3 so they should be able to impliment something.

Isn't that already there? My controller has turned itself off a few times before when left alone for a short while. It isn't low on charge, BTW! :D

I've mentioned that before in these forums, a friend of mine has a JAP 60GB and his controllers power off automatically.

Would be much better than taking screen shots.

But I think Sony just have other priorities, think they gave this feature a back-seat for now.

Yeah, it took them months just to let you update the firmware without having to pair a controller, or navigate the XMB with the analog. They must be busy making couches and other virtual furniture.

I don't suppose there's anyway to get optical and hdmi outputs working at the same time correct? I have no receiver. I just want my TV speakers to have sound too.

Sure there is, as that is how my setup is, HDMI for the Video, Optical for the Audio.

I believe you just choose each setting as such in the settings and you are good to go.

Sure there is, as that is how my setup is, HDMI for the Video, Optical for the Audio.

I believe you just choose each setting as such in the settings and you are good to go.

Isnt optical supposed to be of lower quality than what HDMi 1.3 carries?

I looked into this, but read that HDMI was actually better quality.

Then a battery charge doesn't last long.
Something wrong. I've sat and played COD4 for 3 or 4 hours straight once or twice and it never even got below 2 of 3 little blocks. Mine holds for seemingly a long time, unlike I found with the xbox 360 controllers. Anyways, I'd also like to have the ability to press the PS button when a message is received and have it bring you directly to the message.
Sorry about my unclear question.

Can I use HDMI and optical for audio at the same time? My 5.1 speakers use optical, and I want my TV to have sound through HDMI

I do not believe so, you have to choose the output setting and you can only select one.

For the above posters questioning which is better to use.... unless you have a receiver that is capable of receiving the 5.1 audio via HDMI, you are better off using optical for 5.1 surround.

Isnt optical supposed to be of lower quality than what HDMi 1.3 carries?

I looked into this, but read that HDMI was actually better quality.

Yep, its better to be using HDMI then using the Optical. There is a level of quality loss when using an optical cable versus a HDMI cable.

My battery lasts atleast 8-10 hours...

I do not believe so, you have to choose the output setting and you can only select one.

For the above posters questioning which is better to use.... unless you have a receiver that is capable of receiving the 5.1 audio via HDMI, you are better off using optical for 5.1 surround.

What jerzdawg said. My receiver was nothing super fancy, so for the 5.1 Digital Dolby, I need to use Optical. And I will tell you what, it sounds pretty damn good to me either way.

What jerzdawg said. My receiver was nothing super fancy, so for the 5.1 Digital Dolby, I need to use Optical. And I will tell you what, it sounds pretty damn good to me either way.

I forgot to tell you DL.. I finally picked up a new receiver... this one can accept the digital audio via HDMI so I have been able to hear the dolby true hd and dtshd or whatever they call it for bluray, it def sounds great... but I still don't know if it is due to that or that it was an upgrade from my aging sony receiver...

I forgot to tell you DL.. I finally picked up a new receiver... this one can accept the digital audio via HDMI so I have been able to hear the dolby true hd and dtshd or whatever they call it for bluray, it def sounds great... but I still don't know if it is due to that or that it was an upgrade from my aging sony receiver...

Nice. I gotta check it out one day and see if I can hear the difference.

The only thing I can really notice is a lot of newer games are actually made in Dolby Digital, where even games released earlier this year were not, so the new games it does make a big difference in the sound.

Nice. I gotta check it out one day and see if I can hear the difference.

The only thing I can really notice is a lot of newer games are actually made in Dolby Digital, where even games released earlier this year were not, so the new games it does make a big difference in the sound.

hmm... perhaps our resident ps3 expert AB can answer this.... is there any plans for a game to be released with the audio formats such as TrueHD or DTS-HD ..

hmm... perhaps our resident ps3 expert AB can answer this.... is there any plans for a game to be released with the audio formats such as TrueHD or DTS-HD ..

MGS4, Uncharted, and R:FoM were PCM 7.1, according to a couple posts on Blu-ray.com.

I remember Kojima saying they were using PCM 7.1 a long time ago, tho, so I know that holds up.

MGS4, Uncharted, and R:FoM were PCM 7.1, according to a couple posts on Blu-ray.com.

I remember Kojima saying they were using PCM 7.1 a long time ago, tho, so I know that holds up.

nice... i only have mgs4... but I would like to see if there is any difference at all ... thanks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!