Just curious


Recommended Posts

It'll run.. but not that great with just 1 gig of ram.. 2 gig and it would probably run decently. Again, I still wouldn't bother with it until you have a dual core or better.. XP WILL run faster than vista on single core machines. It's just a good rule of thumb ... we've found this to be the case where I work.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/662244-just-curious/#findComment-589703510
Share on other sites

XP will run faster than Vista on single core OR multi core machines - Vista, however, still performs fine on single core machines.

You're right. It was just a "general" recommendation though. As single core machines tend to have less RAM, slower BUS speed, slower HDDs, etc. They're running on 3 year old technology.. However, a decent dual core machine will not seem any slower on XP vs Vista.

It's pretty simple:

XP on old machines

Vista on new machines

Part of the reason Vista has a bad rep is because of people loading it up on there **** ass old computers. All the while expecting Vista will be just as snappy as XP. This is why I think it's good to never recommend Vista to anyone who isn't running new hardware. Why fuel the fire?

I'm not saying Family Guy Fan's computer won't run Vista acceptably, i'm saying XP will be the better choice.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/662244-just-curious/#findComment-589703640
Share on other sites

You're right. It was just a "general" recommendation though. As single core machines tend to have less RAM, slower BUS speed, slower HDDs, etc. They're running on 3 year old technology.. However, a decent dual core machine will not seem any slower on XP vs Vista.

It's pretty simple:

XP on old machines

Vista on new machines

Part of the reason Vista has a bad rep is because of people loading it up on there **** ass old computers. All the while expecting Vista will be just as snappy as XP. This is why I think it's good to never recommend Vista to anyone who isn't running new hardware. Why fuel the fire?

I'm not saying Family Guy Fan's computer won't run Vista acceptably, i'm saying XP will be the better choice.

Couldn't agree more. I installed windows vista on my wife's single core, 2gb memory laptop. After only a few weeks of using it, she wanted XP back because vista felt sluggish. I have been using vista on my machines since its beta days, and absolutely love it. However, for older hardware, I would still run XP. Even if that older hardware is vista capable.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/662244-just-curious/#findComment-589704078
Share on other sites

how much do dual core processors or w/e usually cost?

These days you can build a fairly nice dual core machine for probably around $500. This is without a stellar video card. (you could totally reuse your 7600) Best bang for the buck is probably the e8400 ? Which is currently $169.99 on newegg.com. It's pretty easy to get these overclocked to 3.6 on air. They'll still be plenty fast without overclocking (2 cores at 3ghz).

Another option is a quad core processor. The q6600 (179.99). If you can spend more money then maybe a q9300 (259.99) or q9550 (324.99)...

If I was building a new machine today I would choose the e8400 over the quad cores. Mainly because the e8400 is built on 45nm technology where as the cheaper quad core is built on 65nm. If you're going to do video encoding or things that are very cpu intensive then maybe a quad core would be a good choice but other than that you probably won't notice any difference between a quad core and a dual core.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/662244-just-curious/#findComment-589706490
Share on other sites

Nightburn:I Disagree that you need a dual core cpu to make vista work well, i have a athlon 64 3000+ single core and it runs vista fine but this system is 5 yrs old from 2003, all you need to get vista to work well is plenty of memory and a good gpu. anways for you vista would work good for you but what will limit vista's potentional is low memory and a crappy gpu,get at least 2GB maybe 3GB and it will work good. i couldnt go back to xp as it would have the lunch affect but vista does not have that.

Wolken007: vista will feel sluggish for awhile as it is learning your habits and once it does that it is fast.if your wife is saying vista is too slow then up the memory and gpu and it will work fine.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/662244-just-curious/#findComment-589708760
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!