Recommended Posts

IMO Microsoft is becoming less relevant in the browser scene all the time.

in the geek's "browser scene", maybe. but for the mainstream, you just can't ignore a browser that still has over 70% market, and people still need to make sure their websites work in IE6 when they are making websites for a living.

Downloaded and installed, and immediately went to the Lenovo website to get some information on a new computer, only to find the words are extremely small and unreadable! See attached image. Anyone experience this or know what's going on? Note: Even changing the font size doesn't change anything.

It's because lenovo is doing browser sniffing and sends special "quirky" layout to IE browsers due to past IE quirks. But now IE8 is more standards compliant, they should send the non-quirky layout (for non-IE browsers) to IE8, however since their sites have (naturally) not been updated for IE8, they continue to send the quirky layout, which completely mess up when rendered in the more standards compliant IE8 engine. The only way to fix it is to use the "Compatibility View" button (in front of the refresh button, after the address field) to make IE8 render in IE7 mode.

so i have to ask this if i install this and dont like it for what ever reason will i be able to uninstall it ? and go back to 7

im running vista sp1

Yep, open Programs and Features then click "View Installed Updates" in the sidebar, it's listed in there.

Oh well it fails the new acid test miserably! Try for yourself here...

What a shock! :whistle:

well, considering that ALL browsers' official releases still fail Acid3, it's not shocking at all. At least it is improving (from 14/100 in IE7 to 18/100 in IE8b1 to 21/100 in IE8b2), and now it fully passes Acid2.

I have Beta 1 installed, and with Beta 2 you must uninstall B1 before installing it. Thing is, I have (apparently) no way of uninstalling B1...it isn't anywhere that I can find! Ugh. I'm on Vista 64 btw. Odd.

don't think there's the need to uninstall B1 before install B2. For me the B2 installation automatically uninstalls B1.

in the geek's "browser scene", maybe. but for the mainstream, you just can't ignore a browser that still has over 70% market, and people still need to make sure their websites work in IE6 when they are making websites for a living.

I understand your point.

But there is a problem in the House of Microsoft.

They have created a more standards compliant browser, at the same time effectively breaking some sites.

Here is another problem. People who use IE (generalization) don't know a lot about computers. Can you imagine a normal computer user learning that they have to click an icon in the address bar to engage Compatibility View? Not going to happen.

Most users would probably be better of with Firefox since it now breaks less sites than Internet Explorer 8.

:(

well, considering that ALL browsers' official releases still fail Acid3, it's not shocking at all. At least it is improving (from 14/100 in IE7 to 18/100 in IE8b1 to 21/100 in IE8b2), and now it fully passes Acid2.

IE8 Beta 2 scores 12/100.

Firefox 3 scores 71/100.

Not exactly amazing results for IE8. Sadly.

I understand your point.

But there is a problem in the House of Microsoft.

They have created a more standards compliant browser, at the same time effectively breaking some sites.

Here is another problem. People who use IE (generalization) don't know a lot about computers. Can you imagine a normal computer user learning that they have to click an icon in the address bar to engage Compatibility View? Not going to happen.

Most users would probably be better of with Firefox since it now breaks less sites than Internet Explorer 8.

:(

IE8 Beta 2 scores 12/100.

Firefox 3 scores 71/100.

Not exactly amazing results for IE8. Sadly.

you mean there is a problem in the house of web developers? It's not the user who has to set the compability mode (the user can do it ofcourse) but ultimately it's up to the developer to choose whether he wants his site te be compliant (doctype) or use quirks mode.

I'd love MS to fix the mime-type sniffing it does, instead of forcing sites to opt-out of it.

Ever go to a site in Firefox and get the markup as plain text instead? It's because in IE it transparently treats it as HTML (ignoring the mime-type), so the web developer doesn't bother fixing it.

Perhaps. Either way the user will end up loosing. I hate the idea of having to click a button to fix IE8 so that it loads a web site correctly.

not really, the very few sites that have issues now will be mostly resolved by the time the browser is released and if it not within a couple of months.

basically competitiion between browsers is good. everybody wins.

basically competition between browsers is good. everybody wins.

(Y)

Yes. But I just don't see IE8 to be real competition to Firefox 3 right now.

Even now at Beta 2, IE8 is clearly better than IE7. But it still feels like a lesser product to Opera and Firefox.

Lol. This was leaked weeks ago.

Same as what Microsoft released today?

So why did Microsoft make geeks wait?

(Y)

Yes. But I just don't see IE8 to be real competition to Firefox 3 right now.

Even now at Beta 2, IE8 is clearly better than IE7. But it still feels like a lesser product to Opera and Firefox.

Same as what Microsoft released today?

So why did Microsoft make geeks wait?

That is what I lulz about...

Much better than beta 1, that's for sure. Now I can finally ditch Opera and go back to IE :)

How lame!

Browser hopping fanboy!! :laugh:

I don't see anything spectacular about this. It's just a browser!!

I'll stick with Seamonkey, because I know how to make my own decisions and not just follow behind everyone else!! ;)

Time to switch back/boot to Linux

Microsoft really need to get out of the Internet Browser business... seriously.

I'd like to see you make a better browser :rolleyes:

I don't know what the fuss on the Acid3 Test is all about. Majority of the computer users are casual users and not end users like developers. If most pages render fine and follows most of the web standards, what's the problem? Even developers don't seem to be too unhappy with this release.

I don't see anything spectacular about this. It's just a browser!!

You would understand if you knew how awful Internet Explorer was and Microsoft's commitments to making it a better browser.

IE used to be the only logical browser to use until Firefox and Opera came along (then Safari). Now it's all about competition and IE is hanging back while everyone waits for it to make a comeback...

I understand your point.

But there is a problem in the House of Microsoft.

They have created a more standards compliant browser, at the same time effectively breaking some sites.

Here is another problem. People who use IE (generalization) don't know a lot about computers. Can you imagine a normal computer user learning that they have to click an icon in the address bar to engage Compatibility View? Not going to happen.

Most users would probably be better of with Firefox since it now breaks less sites than Internet Explorer 8.

:(

Most users would probably still keeps using IE6 and IE7, until Windows 7 comes out and pre-installs IE8 or IE9 with it. Really, those who "don't know a lot about computers" don't learn to download an alternative browser, they just keep using what comes with the OS.

And I'm pretty sure Firefox won't "breaks less sites" than IE8, at least after IE8 goes final, since by that time all those company managers will drive their programmers to check for IE8 compatibility. I'm pretty sure for those web programmers who make a living by coding websites (myself being one of them), it's an easy choice between adding a meta tag to the website to force IE7 mode, or getting fired and let their family starve :pinch:

As someone who makes a living by writing websites, I always dream for a world where I only need to code by web standards, but for now as long as IE still has the big chunk of the market, my boss'll force me to code for IE in the foreseeable future :x

IE8 Beta 2 scores 12/100.

Firefox 3 scores 71/100.

Not exactly amazing results for IE8. Sadly.

It's 21/100, not 12/200, for IE8b2. When it comes to IE, that score already surpassed my expectations :laugh:

IE used to be the only logical browser to use until Firefox and Opera came along (then Safari). Now it's all about competition and IE is hanging back while everyone waits for it to make a comeback...

Actually Opera 1.0 was there before IE 1.0 ;)

The way I see it. Unless Mozilla totally botches up Firefox 3.1 -> . Firefox will continue to capture more market share from Microsoft.

I agree, but at the same time Firefox won't be able to surpass IE in market share in the foreseeable future, and I'm pretty sure even if it happens, it won't be in the lifetime of IE8.

Smart Screen filtering is a good idea. But how do I report sites to Microsoft that are not safe or block them myself?

there's a "Report Unsafe Website" in Menu Bar -> Tools -> SmartScreen Filter -> Report Unsafe Website

It's 21/100, not 12/200, for IE8b2. When it comes to IE, that score already surpassed my expectations :laugh:

You are correct. My mistake. There is a gold bar popup about running Microsoft XML or something, then the test completed.

I agree, but at the same time Firefox won't be able to surpass IE in market share in the foreseeable future, and I'm pretty sure even if it happens, it won't be in the lifetime of IE8.

Microsoft would have to stop bundling IE with Windows or be forced to stop bundling IE with Windows. Then Firefox would have a real chance to take the market. :)

Installed the beta, and had some issues...

The windows sidebar does not open, keeps crashing (it just opens the bar itself and then crashes).

Another thing, it BSODed my system ... Probably something with Kaspersky Internet Security 2009 (klif.sys)

Other than this, it is fast!

System: Vista x64, E6600 4Gb RAM

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!