Recommended Posts

IMO Microsoft is becoming less relevant in the browser scene all the time.

in the geek's "browser scene", maybe. but for the mainstream, you just can't ignore a browser that still has over 70% market, and people still need to make sure their websites work in IE6 when they are making websites for a living.

Downloaded and installed, and immediately went to the Lenovo website to get some information on a new computer, only to find the words are extremely small and unreadable! See attached image. Anyone experience this or know what's going on? Note: Even changing the font size doesn't change anything.

It's because lenovo is doing browser sniffing and sends special "quirky" layout to IE browsers due to past IE quirks. But now IE8 is more standards compliant, they should send the non-quirky layout (for non-IE browsers) to IE8, however since their sites have (naturally) not been updated for IE8, they continue to send the quirky layout, which completely mess up when rendered in the more standards compliant IE8 engine. The only way to fix it is to use the "Compatibility View" button (in front of the refresh button, after the address field) to make IE8 render in IE7 mode.

so i have to ask this if i install this and dont like it for what ever reason will i be able to uninstall it ? and go back to 7

im running vista sp1

Yep, open Programs and Features then click "View Installed Updates" in the sidebar, it's listed in there.

Oh well it fails the new acid test miserably! Try for yourself here...

What a shock! :whistle:

well, considering that ALL browsers' official releases still fail Acid3, it's not shocking at all. At least it is improving (from 14/100 in IE7 to 18/100 in IE8b1 to 21/100 in IE8b2), and now it fully passes Acid2.

I have Beta 1 installed, and with Beta 2 you must uninstall B1 before installing it. Thing is, I have (apparently) no way of uninstalling B1...it isn't anywhere that I can find! Ugh. I'm on Vista 64 btw. Odd.

don't think there's the need to uninstall B1 before install B2. For me the B2 installation automatically uninstalls B1.

in the geek's "browser scene", maybe. but for the mainstream, you just can't ignore a browser that still has over 70% market, and people still need to make sure their websites work in IE6 when they are making websites for a living.

I understand your point.

But there is a problem in the House of Microsoft.

They have created a more standards compliant browser, at the same time effectively breaking some sites.

Here is another problem. People who use IE (generalization) don't know a lot about computers. Can you imagine a normal computer user learning that they have to click an icon in the address bar to engage Compatibility View? Not going to happen.

Most users would probably be better of with Firefox since it now breaks less sites than Internet Explorer 8.

:(

well, considering that ALL browsers' official releases still fail Acid3, it's not shocking at all. At least it is improving (from 14/100 in IE7 to 18/100 in IE8b1 to 21/100 in IE8b2), and now it fully passes Acid2.

IE8 Beta 2 scores 12/100.

Firefox 3 scores 71/100.

Not exactly amazing results for IE8. Sadly.

I understand your point.

But there is a problem in the House of Microsoft.

They have created a more standards compliant browser, at the same time effectively breaking some sites.

Here is another problem. People who use IE (generalization) don't know a lot about computers. Can you imagine a normal computer user learning that they have to click an icon in the address bar to engage Compatibility View? Not going to happen.

Most users would probably be better of with Firefox since it now breaks less sites than Internet Explorer 8.

:(

IE8 Beta 2 scores 12/100.

Firefox 3 scores 71/100.

Not exactly amazing results for IE8. Sadly.

you mean there is a problem in the house of web developers? It's not the user who has to set the compability mode (the user can do it ofcourse) but ultimately it's up to the developer to choose whether he wants his site te be compliant (doctype) or use quirks mode.

I'd love MS to fix the mime-type sniffing it does, instead of forcing sites to opt-out of it.

Ever go to a site in Firefox and get the markup as plain text instead? It's because in IE it transparently treats it as HTML (ignoring the mime-type), so the web developer doesn't bother fixing it.

Perhaps. Either way the user will end up loosing. I hate the idea of having to click a button to fix IE8 so that it loads a web site correctly.

not really, the very few sites that have issues now will be mostly resolved by the time the browser is released and if it not within a couple of months.

basically competitiion between browsers is good. everybody wins.

basically competition between browsers is good. everybody wins.

(Y)

Yes. But I just don't see IE8 to be real competition to Firefox 3 right now.

Even now at Beta 2, IE8 is clearly better than IE7. But it still feels like a lesser product to Opera and Firefox.

Lol. This was leaked weeks ago.

Same as what Microsoft released today?

So why did Microsoft make geeks wait?

(Y)

Yes. But I just don't see IE8 to be real competition to Firefox 3 right now.

Even now at Beta 2, IE8 is clearly better than IE7. But it still feels like a lesser product to Opera and Firefox.

Same as what Microsoft released today?

So why did Microsoft make geeks wait?

That is what I lulz about...

Much better than beta 1, that's for sure. Now I can finally ditch Opera and go back to IE :)

How lame!

Browser hopping fanboy!! :laugh:

I don't see anything spectacular about this. It's just a browser!!

I'll stick with Seamonkey, because I know how to make my own decisions and not just follow behind everyone else!! ;)

Time to switch back/boot to Linux

Microsoft really need to get out of the Internet Browser business... seriously.

I'd like to see you make a better browser :rolleyes:

I don't know what the fuss on the Acid3 Test is all about. Majority of the computer users are casual users and not end users like developers. If most pages render fine and follows most of the web standards, what's the problem? Even developers don't seem to be too unhappy with this release.

I don't see anything spectacular about this. It's just a browser!!

You would understand if you knew how awful Internet Explorer was and Microsoft's commitments to making it a better browser.

IE used to be the only logical browser to use until Firefox and Opera came along (then Safari). Now it's all about competition and IE is hanging back while everyone waits for it to make a comeback...

I understand your point.

But there is a problem in the House of Microsoft.

They have created a more standards compliant browser, at the same time effectively breaking some sites.

Here is another problem. People who use IE (generalization) don't know a lot about computers. Can you imagine a normal computer user learning that they have to click an icon in the address bar to engage Compatibility View? Not going to happen.

Most users would probably be better of with Firefox since it now breaks less sites than Internet Explorer 8.

:(

Most users would probably still keeps using IE6 and IE7, until Windows 7 comes out and pre-installs IE8 or IE9 with it. Really, those who "don't know a lot about computers" don't learn to download an alternative browser, they just keep using what comes with the OS.

And I'm pretty sure Firefox won't "breaks less sites" than IE8, at least after IE8 goes final, since by that time all those company managers will drive their programmers to check for IE8 compatibility. I'm pretty sure for those web programmers who make a living by coding websites (myself being one of them), it's an easy choice between adding a meta tag to the website to force IE7 mode, or getting fired and let their family starve :pinch:

As someone who makes a living by writing websites, I always dream for a world where I only need to code by web standards, but for now as long as IE still has the big chunk of the market, my boss'll force me to code for IE in the foreseeable future :x

IE8 Beta 2 scores 12/100.

Firefox 3 scores 71/100.

Not exactly amazing results for IE8. Sadly.

It's 21/100, not 12/200, for IE8b2. When it comes to IE, that score already surpassed my expectations :laugh:

IE used to be the only logical browser to use until Firefox and Opera came along (then Safari). Now it's all about competition and IE is hanging back while everyone waits for it to make a comeback...

Actually Opera 1.0 was there before IE 1.0 ;)

The way I see it. Unless Mozilla totally botches up Firefox 3.1 -> . Firefox will continue to capture more market share from Microsoft.

I agree, but at the same time Firefox won't be able to surpass IE in market share in the foreseeable future, and I'm pretty sure even if it happens, it won't be in the lifetime of IE8.

Smart Screen filtering is a good idea. But how do I report sites to Microsoft that are not safe or block them myself?

there's a "Report Unsafe Website" in Menu Bar -> Tools -> SmartScreen Filter -> Report Unsafe Website

It's 21/100, not 12/200, for IE8b2. When it comes to IE, that score already surpassed my expectations :laugh:

You are correct. My mistake. There is a gold bar popup about running Microsoft XML or something, then the test completed.

I agree, but at the same time Firefox won't be able to surpass IE in market share in the foreseeable future, and I'm pretty sure even if it happens, it won't be in the lifetime of IE8.

Microsoft would have to stop bundling IE with Windows or be forced to stop bundling IE with Windows. Then Firefox would have a real chance to take the market. :)

Installed the beta, and had some issues...

The windows sidebar does not open, keeps crashing (it just opens the bar itself and then crashes).

Another thing, it BSODed my system ... Probably something with Kaspersky Internet Security 2009 (klif.sys)

Other than this, it is fast!

System: Vista x64, E6600 4Gb RAM

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • For the purpose that it was built for, it’s a great machine. It’s okay to own multiple machines, it’s okay for machines to be different. If every computer was the same, they’d be boring af.
    • OpenAI is rolling out a major upgrade to ChatGPT memory by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI is rolling out a major upgrade to ChatGPT's memory, making the system more capable, current, and scalable across long-term use. Memory allows ChatGPT to remember useful details about users, including their preferences, projects, and constraints. Instead of starting every conversation from scratch, ChatGPT can use this context to provide more relevant responses in future chats. OpenAI first launched saved memories in February 2024. That feature allowed users to explicitly ask ChatGPT to save information into its memory, such as travel plans or writing preferences. However, this system had limits because it depended heavily on users giving clear instructions to remember something. Additionally, saved memories could become stale over time. In April 2025, OpenAI expanded memory by allowing ChatGPT to reference past chat context outside the saved memories list. This was powered by a background process called “dreaming,” which automatically curates memories from chat history. This made ChatGPT better at learning from natural conversation without requiring users to manually save every detail. Today, OpenAI announced a more capable and compute-efficient memory architecture built on top of dreaming. This new system improves ChatGPT’s ability to carry forward useful context, follow user preferences, and remain accurate as time passes. According to OpenAI’s internal evaluations, the new system improves factual recall from 67.9% in 2025 to 82.8% in 2026. Preference adherence improves from 55.3% to 71.3%, while accuracy over time improves from 52.2% to 75.1%. The best part of this new system is a new memory summary page where users can review ChatGPT's memories. Users can even update details, correct information, or give instructions on what topics ChatGPT should bring up and when. This new, improved memory system is available to ChatGPT Plus and Pro users in the US starting today. It will roll out to more countries, as well as Free and Go users, in the coming weeks.
    • I work for a video production company in Australia. The camera operators shoot footage and then pass the SD card over to the editors. Much easier than handing over the entire camera. Plus, on a busy day you can hand off the SD card and then pop another in for the next shoot. Or, you might have used multiple SD cards because you need the extra space for a long shoot. I also use USB cables and wifi for transferring footage, but in many cases an SD card reader is the easiest method.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      59
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!