Sound via a ATi 4850 over HDMI


Recommended Posts

Hey guys, so I read somewhere that the ATi HD Cards all support HDMI via an adapter similar to those used for DVI-VGA. I also read that doing this also allows for sound to travel via HDMI.

Anyone have any ideas on this? My PC will primarily be hooked up to my HDTV and obviously this'd save a audio cable if it were possible. I wish I could find the original review to double check, but I cant.

Thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/662546-sound-via-a-ati-4850-over-hdmi/
Share on other sites

Look what I found,

http://www.sapphiretech.com/us/productfile...ound_output.pdf

Anyone have any experience with doing this? From what I understand the Graphics Card has its OWN Audio Processor instead of just forwarding the audio from the Internal Audio. Doubt it's any worse then the built in SoundCard on my motherboard.

Go to Realtek, grab download the "ATI HDMI Audio Device" Driver and install it.

http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downlo...p;GetDown=false

Connect the HDMI Cable

Next right click on the volume icon in the system tray (by the time) and choose 'Playback Devices'.

Then right click on Realtek HDMI Output (ATi HDMI Audio), and select 'Set as Default Device'.

Voila, sound over HDMI!

Note: My 'Set as Default Device' is grayed out since I don't have HDMI Connected at the moment, it will become available once you connect the card to a HDMI source.

post-11767-1219886278.jpg

  • 1 year later...
Go to Realtek, grab download the "ATI HDMI Audio Device" Driver and install it.

http://www.realtek.com.tw/downloads/downlo...p;GetDown=false

Connect the HDMI Cable

Next right click on the volume icon in the system tray (by the time) and choose 'Playback Devices'.

Then right click on Realtek HDMI Output (ATi HDMI Audio), and select 'Set as Default Device'.

Voila, sound over HDMI!

Note: My 'Set as Default Device' is grayed out since I don't have HDMI Connected at the moment, it will become available once you connect the card to a HDMI source.

Hi ive downloaded and installed drivers ,i just dont know how to do it in windows xp :( my video card is ati 4850 and i have dvi connected in my video card and hdmi in my lcd - can someone please tell me how to do it in windows xp please!! :)

edit: im sorry :( i just saw post 9.. the problem now is that under Sound playback /default devices now i see Realtec HD audio output and sound tap recorder .. someone please help :)

Edited by thefear1
Hi ive downloaded and installed drivers ,i just dont know how to do it in windows xp :( my video card is ati 4850 and i have dvi connected in my video card and hdmi in my lcd - can someone please tell me how to do it in windows xp please!! :)

edit: im sorry :( i just saw post 9.. the problem now is that under Sound playback /default devices now i see Realtec HD audio output and sound tap recorder .. someone please help :)

Audio will not transfer from the DVI port. To transfer audio and video in the same cable you must use a HDMI to HDMI connection.

Does your graphics card have a HDMI port?

no my vid.card is 4850 and it has 2 dvi ports.. dvi side of the cable goes from the card and hdmi side in the lcd...i 've connected it to the lcd and been watching 1080p movies and stuff but the sound comes from my computer speakers :) can i make it come out from the tv?

Edited by thefear1
If there is no HDMI port and it indeed can transfer audio over HDMI, it probably has a non-standard DVI port and requires a special DVI-HDMI adapter.

Actually dvi ports are capable of sound its just that most companies didnt do it because computers didnt need to but now that lcd screens are more common the 4xxx series and up can do it via an regular dvi-hdmi adapter.

"DVI to HDMIUnlike HDMI, DVI usually carries no audio data in its TMDS channel. However, as DVI is for the most part compatible with HDMI (see Compatibility with DVI), it is just as possible to support including audio data by incorporating the audio in the TMDS signal. Because DVI displays typically have no sound capabilities, a DVI to HDMI adapter/cable can then be used to connect the device to an HDMI display. For instance, this feature allows PCs to send audiovisual data to a high definition television. It is increasingly found on modern computer graphics cards (e.g. cards by Nvidia[1] and ATI[2]) and certain motherboards with integrated graphics."

Hmm Some dvi to hdmi connectors dont allow the audio. IM guessing due to not having all the required pins .So if you still have the dv to hdmi adapter that came with your card then you should be set.

IF not this one should work .

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16814999010

sorry had wrong link.

You need an Official ATI HD Radion DVI to HDMI adaptor, these will carry sound from the graphics card over HDMI.

Most DVI to HDMI adaptors will not carry sound, however the official ATI ones too.

I?m using one of these on my media centre pc: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Original-ATI-HD-Rade...=item4ceba0252b

After you have an ATI DVI to HDMI adaptor just do what tkyoshi says in the above post and you will get audio and video over HDM:):)

Any drivers for sound are included with the Catalyst drivers.

  • 7 months later...

you do not need any cables to connect to the graphics card from the inside of the computer apart from the power cable. on ATI cards the DVI-HDMI port is sometimes a different color. on my 4850 the port is colored yellow. all you need is the special DVI-HDMI adapter and a HDMI lead, plug them in and then into the TV/LCD monitor and enable the HDMI audio output on windows. the Catalyst drivers come with the Audio drivers included. install them and you are ready to go.

im confused - there's a DVI-to-HDMI adapter... ok but that wont transmit sound. DVI wont transmit sound at all...

if you have an HDMI plug on the card, then that'll pass audio to a tv (for example) when the option is selected in the driver (or during the install like i do)

im confused - there's a DVI-to-HDMI adapter... ok but that wont transmit sound. DVI wont transmit sound at all...

if you have an HDMI plug on the card, then that'll pass audio to a tv (for example) when the option is selected in the driver (or during the install like i do)

Yes it will transmit sound, i use it alot. the DVI port on the sound card is modified to transmit sound on the newer cards, and the adapters are able to pick the sound up and push it through the HDMI cable to the Monitor /TV.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!