Questions about working for a small company


Recommended Posts

One company I interviewed for was spectacular in an industry I never thought of applying for. There was a scheduling conflict. The money - everything - was all there. When I applied to a competitor, I have a 2nd interview with the owner tomorrow. The thing is, there's lot of money in that business. They have really big clients, long established 15+ year reputation, industry accolades and they're in a high priced part of town.

Thing is, the office looks a tad out of style. The office decor is from the 70s. Their front office staff are a bit unprofessional. I think the money is there for the job. Their sales staff, which is probably where I'm going to work seem like great people - well dressed and such.

Any thoughts or opinions? I'm sure I'll get a serious offer, but there's a few other jobs opps. I have. I don't want to be looking for new work much longer. Patience thing not money related.

Sounds like the only thing that you've got against this company you're considering is their style. Nothing to turn a job down for - maybe even suggest some changes when you've been there for a year or more.

Personally I'd say, based on what you're telling me, it seems like a good fit for you.

One company I interviewed for was spectacular in an industry I never thought of applying for. There was a scheduling conflict. The money - everything - was all there. When I applied to a competitor, I have a 2nd interview with the owner tomorrow. The thing is, there's lot of money in that business. They have really big clients, long established 15+ year reputation, industry accolades and they're in a high priced part of town.

Thing is, the office looks a tad out of style. The office decor is from the 70s. Their front office staff are a bit unprofessional. I think the money is there for the job. Their sales staff, which is probably where I'm going to work seem like great people - well dressed and such.

Any thoughts or opinions? I'm sure I'll get a serious offer, but there's a few other jobs opps. I have. I don't want to be looking for new work much longer. Patience thing not money related.

just go for it... if you don't like it move on after a year or so

i work for a small company, its great.. the opportunities are far greater and you get a lot more responsibility earlier on in your career which in my opinion can only be good for you!

again, go for it! :D

Bit more detail then,

Its more because of the image that it presents to the customer. But it seems like they focus more on meeting clients than bringing them in. I'll meet with the big cheese and see how it goes. I guess at the least, it being a pretty cut-throat business, they seem like good folks to deal with. I put my salary expectations on paper and there have not been any objections yet.

I don't deny small companies aren't good. They are a bit more slack with qualifications and are usually awesome with compensation then I would get for a similar role in larger company. I had worked in a few small businesses, the entire office was rather cheap and the boss paid cheap too. One was also a venture capital which was funded by some really rich dudes. They stopped funding and I lost my job. Here and now I can't afford to.

Any tips suggestions per above from your experience ? Job rention, compensation, and such.

Unless the decor is really ugly it's not the most important thing really. The chances are they don't have much money to spend on it, it's not a priority. The same may well be true for the front office staff. I wouldn't be put off by that if you're getting a good wage and secure job, although I think the fact that you are doubtful is a bad sign. If those people are unprofessional, is it going to affect you?

I've worked for a small company of accountants. They were cheap on wages but the job was secure. I actually had to demand a certain wage after my 13 week trial because they tried to take the **** and pay me minimum wage.

Personally, I hope to work for a small-medium sized business when I finish my degree. I have worked in bigger companies and I much prefer the flexibility and variety of smaller ones, as long as they are generous enough on the wages and value their support staff :p

I guess cause I was screwed before.

I met with the big cheese today. Super nice guy. Probably nicest I've ever met. I can see why he's so good at what he does. Anyways, I think its a great opportunity but this particular business goes in waves with its ups and downs. I have something else on table and this *is* the career opportunity of my life, I'm meeting next week. The first cheese is willing to wait a week or two, making sure I really want this.

I'm very tempted to work on a small commission basis and try and get more customers for him. Not that, it seems, the company really needs it. Just he's well placed and has lots of contacts. Should be easy to get another job after if something doesn't work out well elsewhere. Just with other FT job, might be hard. I do have a debt to work off though. My FT job is good cash, but any PT stuff is really going to help. The sooner I pay off my debt (its around 15k), even though I realize there's a $500 penalty for the loans I have, it will help with a mortgage instead of rent. My folks co-signed on a portion of a loan and I want to get it off their backs.

I have worked in both corporate and small companies. I am presently 3 years into a small company.

I can honestly say that corporate is more concerned about numbers and where the money went and is going. They care more about that, then their workers/drones.

Where I work now, I have honestly been able to say that even though the office decor and setting is not indicative of what type of my company is, (ergonomic), it isn't the environment that makes a 100% deciding factor. If the quality of work is out there and quality of employee treatment is there, then it will be an awesome job.

To give you an idea of where I work, it is in a "Strip mall" type of building, we have offices which sit about 3 people max per office. So, you have store front number one which is a door and window to the side. Inside of the door, you have office. It is like this through 5 different offices (Store fronts). This includes one across the street. We have considered going into a larger building, but seem to keep leasing and renewing our lease with the current landlord who loves us as we are the largest tenant for them. Since, we have a good rep with them, we are free to do what we want with the building including merge the existing offices into one. So, pass from one office to another by walking through doors put in what were once solid walls.

What I am getting at is even though the place may be small and sometimes run down, if the product quality is superior and is good, it doesn't matter what the place looks like. (At least where I am 100% online e-commerce no public allowed place).

The good thing about a smaller company is that you can probably move up much easier than working at a bigger company although smaller company does have its risks also the environment is more important.

If they treat you like crap at a big company it does not matter how much they pay you you will be unhappy.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!