Recommended Posts

The session thing UAC does that ends up disabling Aero (Temporarily at least)

It's probably for security, stability, and performance.

The Secure desktop is supposed to be impenetrable. If you add the DWM, you're potentially adding an attack vector. As well, running the DWM on another desktop would add considerable resource usage and most likely making the transition even worse.

If you watch the task manager after startup, you can see the cached memory meter fill up, and free memory drop to zero within a few minutes. On my old laptop, this caused considerable slowness. On my new laptop, and on any other machine I've used, I've never noticed it causing any performance issues. (Which is kind of funny, because my old laptop had a faster hard drive than my new one). After that fills up, the excessive hard drive usage should stop.

Keep in mind that Vista is reading (in some cases) several gigabytes of data off of the harddrive as low priority, which means that it's going to be skipping around/relinquishing control to other apps which are also starting up. That takes more than a few seconds.

I've started using vista with superfetch turned off, it's made a hell of a difference.

the desktop appears roughly 2 seconds after the welcom text appears on screen, usually the welcome text stays on screen for roughly 30 seconds before the desktop shows up.

the hdd thrashing is gone, usually it thrashes for 2-3 mintues after the desktop shows up.

advantage, get to use my pc quickly, i know superfetch on or off has been discussed a lot, but its not really needed imo. the standard prefetching is enough, for 4 days I noticed no change in program load speeds. also disabling readyboost did not affect my boot time.

It's probably for security, stability, and performance.

The Secure desktop is supposed to be impenetrable. If you add the DWM, you're potentially adding an attack vector. As well, running the DWM on another desktop would add considerable resource usage and most likely making the transition even worse.

...

Yeah, but "meh"

I like UAC and I keep it enabled, I just hope MS streamlines it and makes it less annoying in Windows 7, maybe then people will stop disabling it for silly reasons.

Edit: I disabled the sidebar for a few reasons, mainly 99% of my time is spent in full-screen apps and I haven't found any widgets I like (I've found one for the Dashboard in OS X).

I disabled Dreamscene. It was cool at first, but then I noticed I never actually see much of my desktop while I'm using my computer. It's either completely blocked by games/movies, or I have so many windows up I can only see a sliver of desktop. So, in the interest of saving processor time, I went back to static image backgrounds.

I've started using vista with superfetch turned off, it's made a hell of a difference.

the desktop appears roughly 2 seconds after the welcom text appears on screen, usually the welcome text stays on screen for roughly 30 seconds before the desktop shows up.

the hdd thrashing is gone, usually it thrashes for 2-3 mintues after the desktop shows up.

advantage, get to use my pc quickly, i know superfetch on or off has been discussed a lot, but its not really needed imo. the standard prefetching is enough, for 4 days I noticed no change in program load speeds. also disabling readyboost did not affect my boot time.

Glad to see turning it off helped!

I have disabled nothing. I have never actually had any problems with Vista at all.

When I first built my PC in 2007 UAC bothered me but then I had allowed everything so it very rarely pops up now. I have upgraded the CPU since then to a Quad core and a bit more RAM making 3gb but apart from that the system hasnt changed.

Vista idles at 300mb or just over, cpu sits on 1%, hdd never gets thrashed or anything.

Maybe i was one of the lucky ones but i never saw the benefit to disabling anything as my PC ran perfect and never got and lag on opening anything or any games.

I have disabled nothing. I have never actually had any problems with Vista at all.

When I first built my PC in 2007 UAC bothered me but then I had allowed everything so it very rarely pops up now. I have upgraded the CPU since then to a Quad core and a bit more RAM making 3gb but apart from that the system hasnt changed.

Vista idles at 300mb or just over, cpu sits on 1%, hdd never gets thrashed or anything.

Maybe i was one of the lucky ones but i never saw the benefit to disabling anything as my PC ran perfect and never got and lag on opening anything or any games.

300MB?? That's impossible. With all the mentioned features disabled, Vista idles at 600-700MB (at least on my PC).

Edited by Hani

Windows Features I removed are.

Games,Print Services, Tablet Pc Optional Components, Meeting Spaces, Fax and Scan, Windows DFS.

For services.

Windows Search because it is useless for me, Windows Firewall,Defender cause it sucks,Security Center cause it sucks, UAC cause I do not need it, all Diagnostic Services cause they are useless. More but no time to list them all.

Disabling core system features of Vista (UAC, Superfetch, etc) is an absolute waste of your time, money, and machine.

UAC - If you do anything, on a regular basis that requires a prompt via UAC and you're a "Standard User", you're doing something wrong... seriously. Although, Microsoft does need to make it so that if you're an "Administrator", you shouldn't see any prompts. However, shame on those people that use an "Administrator" account on a regular basis...

SuperFetch - It's meant to increase application start times based on the users habits and most used applications. So all those people claiming Vista performed better with superFetch off under 1GB aren't properly testing the feature. You would need to setup a VM, and regularly perform certain tasks at specific intervals to properly give the SuperFetch AI room to work and then test the times. I would say a week of activity would be enough. Also, throwing in curve-balls would be acceptable too, but you should expect it to have a negative outcome.

Search Indexing - A little up in the air, but if you don't search that often, I would think you could spend some extra time and limit the indexing instead of disabling it. Vista caches HDD reads / writes to memory, so indexing on Vista is tremendously faster and a lot more efficient. You'll barely notice it if your HDD is a SATA 1.5gb/s 7200RPMs and higher.

Aero - Most of the "eye candy" is dependent on the GPU and VRAM, which you barely even use outside of playing a game. Guess what else, Vista automatically disables Aero when you're playing a game in full screen mode, so you don't get a performance hit because of it. The performance hit you see is a combination of the DX10 implementation and drivers. So, go ahead, disable Aero and let your video card waste 90% of it's life doing nothing.

ReadyBoost - A feature that will dramatically improve performance on machines with very little / slow memory provided you have the hardware. Regardless, this is a very situational feature, I can understand disabling it if needed.

System Protection - Another situational feature that I understand disabling. Some people are very meticulous in their back-ups already (like me)

UAC - If you do anything, on a regular basis that requires a prompt via UAC and you're a "Standard User", you're doing something wrong... seriously. Although, Microsoft does need to make it so that if you're an "Administrator", you shouldn't see any prompts. However, shame on those people that use an "Administrator" account on a regular basis...
If you use the actual Administrator account, then you don't get UAC prompts.

If you use user created administrator accounts, you get Admin Approval Mode prompts.

If you use a standard user account, you have to plug your password into the UAC box.

So Microsoft has already done that. The account is just disabled by default in order to prevent most people from using it. If people used it all the time, the security advantage over XP would shrink quite a bit.

ReadyBoost - A feature that will dramatically improve performance on machines with very little / slow memory provided you have the hardware. Regardless, this is a very situational feature, I can understand disabling it if needed.

Disabling the ReadyBoost service also disables ReadyBoot, a performance feature.

Disabling the ReadyBoost service also disables ReadyBoot, a performance feature.

Does some searching, what is ReadyBoot.

Hmmm, didn't know that. Always just assumed ReadyBoost was a useless service if don't use the thumb drives as more ram thing.

Turns ReadyBoost service back on.

I disable Search for the sole fact that i NEVER search and can't think of time that I have in the last 3+ years.

Other stuff I have tried on and off and don't really see a noticeable difference over the course of a month. I guess its just my user habits.

Have noticed a definite improvement in my bootup time now with ReadyBoot back on.

As you should. It does some fancy optimizations to try and make it so that the next time you reboot, it's faster.

I'm pretty sure that ReadyBoot helps out the most with more RAM, which makes it slightly ironic that it's housed in the same service as a feature designed to help out RAM limited PCs.

Unfortunately I still have to use Vista at and for work but at home I have disabled it altogether by wiping it off my primary machines. It doesn't make sense to run a slower os just to disable all of its "features". Might as well save the hassle and not use it at all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
    • Watch Louis Rossmann's recent experience on YouTube about trying to get a warranty replacement from Samsung. It's crazy.
    • That is the thing, how many of these people don't realise they are using AI? If they use Google Search they have no choice but to use AI. So yes, maybe half of American adults do use and I expect a lot of Uk adults do to, but I bet most of them don't realise it. Myself, i avoid the rubbish.
    • They use FREE AI. They aren't paying for this meme-generating slopware...
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!