Recommended Posts

The session thing UAC does that ends up disabling Aero (Temporarily at least)

It's probably for security, stability, and performance.

The Secure desktop is supposed to be impenetrable. If you add the DWM, you're potentially adding an attack vector. As well, running the DWM on another desktop would add considerable resource usage and most likely making the transition even worse.

If you watch the task manager after startup, you can see the cached memory meter fill up, and free memory drop to zero within a few minutes. On my old laptop, this caused considerable slowness. On my new laptop, and on any other machine I've used, I've never noticed it causing any performance issues. (Which is kind of funny, because my old laptop had a faster hard drive than my new one). After that fills up, the excessive hard drive usage should stop.

Keep in mind that Vista is reading (in some cases) several gigabytes of data off of the harddrive as low priority, which means that it's going to be skipping around/relinquishing control to other apps which are also starting up. That takes more than a few seconds.

I've started using vista with superfetch turned off, it's made a hell of a difference.

the desktop appears roughly 2 seconds after the welcom text appears on screen, usually the welcome text stays on screen for roughly 30 seconds before the desktop shows up.

the hdd thrashing is gone, usually it thrashes for 2-3 mintues after the desktop shows up.

advantage, get to use my pc quickly, i know superfetch on or off has been discussed a lot, but its not really needed imo. the standard prefetching is enough, for 4 days I noticed no change in program load speeds. also disabling readyboost did not affect my boot time.

It's probably for security, stability, and performance.

The Secure desktop is supposed to be impenetrable. If you add the DWM, you're potentially adding an attack vector. As well, running the DWM on another desktop would add considerable resource usage and most likely making the transition even worse.

...

Yeah, but "meh"

I like UAC and I keep it enabled, I just hope MS streamlines it and makes it less annoying in Windows 7, maybe then people will stop disabling it for silly reasons.

Edit: I disabled the sidebar for a few reasons, mainly 99% of my time is spent in full-screen apps and I haven't found any widgets I like (I've found one for the Dashboard in OS X).

I disabled Dreamscene. It was cool at first, but then I noticed I never actually see much of my desktop while I'm using my computer. It's either completely blocked by games/movies, or I have so many windows up I can only see a sliver of desktop. So, in the interest of saving processor time, I went back to static image backgrounds.

I've started using vista with superfetch turned off, it's made a hell of a difference.

the desktop appears roughly 2 seconds after the welcom text appears on screen, usually the welcome text stays on screen for roughly 30 seconds before the desktop shows up.

the hdd thrashing is gone, usually it thrashes for 2-3 mintues after the desktop shows up.

advantage, get to use my pc quickly, i know superfetch on or off has been discussed a lot, but its not really needed imo. the standard prefetching is enough, for 4 days I noticed no change in program load speeds. also disabling readyboost did not affect my boot time.

Glad to see turning it off helped!

I have disabled nothing. I have never actually had any problems with Vista at all.

When I first built my PC in 2007 UAC bothered me but then I had allowed everything so it very rarely pops up now. I have upgraded the CPU since then to a Quad core and a bit more RAM making 3gb but apart from that the system hasnt changed.

Vista idles at 300mb or just over, cpu sits on 1%, hdd never gets thrashed or anything.

Maybe i was one of the lucky ones but i never saw the benefit to disabling anything as my PC ran perfect and never got and lag on opening anything or any games.

I have disabled nothing. I have never actually had any problems with Vista at all.

When I first built my PC in 2007 UAC bothered me but then I had allowed everything so it very rarely pops up now. I have upgraded the CPU since then to a Quad core and a bit more RAM making 3gb but apart from that the system hasnt changed.

Vista idles at 300mb or just over, cpu sits on 1%, hdd never gets thrashed or anything.

Maybe i was one of the lucky ones but i never saw the benefit to disabling anything as my PC ran perfect and never got and lag on opening anything or any games.

300MB?? That's impossible. With all the mentioned features disabled, Vista idles at 600-700MB (at least on my PC).

Edited by Hani

Windows Features I removed are.

Games,Print Services, Tablet Pc Optional Components, Meeting Spaces, Fax and Scan, Windows DFS.

For services.

Windows Search because it is useless for me, Windows Firewall,Defender cause it sucks,Security Center cause it sucks, UAC cause I do not need it, all Diagnostic Services cause they are useless. More but no time to list them all.

Disabling core system features of Vista (UAC, Superfetch, etc) is an absolute waste of your time, money, and machine.

UAC - If you do anything, on a regular basis that requires a prompt via UAC and you're a "Standard User", you're doing something wrong... seriously. Although, Microsoft does need to make it so that if you're an "Administrator", you shouldn't see any prompts. However, shame on those people that use an "Administrator" account on a regular basis...

SuperFetch - It's meant to increase application start times based on the users habits and most used applications. So all those people claiming Vista performed better with superFetch off under 1GB aren't properly testing the feature. You would need to setup a VM, and regularly perform certain tasks at specific intervals to properly give the SuperFetch AI room to work and then test the times. I would say a week of activity would be enough. Also, throwing in curve-balls would be acceptable too, but you should expect it to have a negative outcome.

Search Indexing - A little up in the air, but if you don't search that often, I would think you could spend some extra time and limit the indexing instead of disabling it. Vista caches HDD reads / writes to memory, so indexing on Vista is tremendously faster and a lot more efficient. You'll barely notice it if your HDD is a SATA 1.5gb/s 7200RPMs and higher.

Aero - Most of the "eye candy" is dependent on the GPU and VRAM, which you barely even use outside of playing a game. Guess what else, Vista automatically disables Aero when you're playing a game in full screen mode, so you don't get a performance hit because of it. The performance hit you see is a combination of the DX10 implementation and drivers. So, go ahead, disable Aero and let your video card waste 90% of it's life doing nothing.

ReadyBoost - A feature that will dramatically improve performance on machines with very little / slow memory provided you have the hardware. Regardless, this is a very situational feature, I can understand disabling it if needed.

System Protection - Another situational feature that I understand disabling. Some people are very meticulous in their back-ups already (like me)

UAC - If you do anything, on a regular basis that requires a prompt via UAC and you're a "Standard User", you're doing something wrong... seriously. Although, Microsoft does need to make it so that if you're an "Administrator", you shouldn't see any prompts. However, shame on those people that use an "Administrator" account on a regular basis...
If you use the actual Administrator account, then you don't get UAC prompts.

If you use user created administrator accounts, you get Admin Approval Mode prompts.

If you use a standard user account, you have to plug your password into the UAC box.

So Microsoft has already done that. The account is just disabled by default in order to prevent most people from using it. If people used it all the time, the security advantage over XP would shrink quite a bit.

ReadyBoost - A feature that will dramatically improve performance on machines with very little / slow memory provided you have the hardware. Regardless, this is a very situational feature, I can understand disabling it if needed.

Disabling the ReadyBoost service also disables ReadyBoot, a performance feature.

Disabling the ReadyBoost service also disables ReadyBoot, a performance feature.

Does some searching, what is ReadyBoot.

Hmmm, didn't know that. Always just assumed ReadyBoost was a useless service if don't use the thumb drives as more ram thing.

Turns ReadyBoost service back on.

I disable Search for the sole fact that i NEVER search and can't think of time that I have in the last 3+ years.

Other stuff I have tried on and off and don't really see a noticeable difference over the course of a month. I guess its just my user habits.

Have noticed a definite improvement in my bootup time now with ReadyBoot back on.

As you should. It does some fancy optimizations to try and make it so that the next time you reboot, it's faster.

I'm pretty sure that ReadyBoot helps out the most with more RAM, which makes it slightly ironic that it's housed in the same service as a feature designed to help out RAM limited PCs.

Unfortunately I still have to use Vista at and for work but at home I have disabled it altogether by wiping it off my primary machines. It doesn't make sense to run a slower os just to disable all of its "features". Might as well save the hassle and not use it at all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to train them to help sort Adobe's old spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better against Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!