Gears of War 2 Achievements


Recommended Posts

I expect so, 10k kills was bloody insane, just for online.

100k is even more insane, but with the new mode being released (survive against waves and waves of enemies) this achievement doesn't seem as insane.

It's an okay list in my opinion.

I play Gears of War enough that I've gotten all the achievements before the updated patch came out. I also knocked those 8 additional achievements out...very quick. Great achievements, game is going to be awesome.

100K is still a hell of a lot. It will take hours to complete even if you sit down dedicated to unlock it :/

I'd much rather have 100K over everything than 10K only in ranked matches, though. That way anytime I want to play it, it goes towards the achievement.

The achievements seem a whole lot more feasible than the first game, IMO. I think as a whole it should be easy if you want to get them all (not sure about the 50 levels of horde... that could be very hard).

I'd much rather have 100K over everything than 10K only in ranked matches, though. That way anytime I want to play it, it goes towards the achievement.

The achievements seem a whole lot more feasible than the first game, IMO. I think as a whole it should be easy if you want to get them all (not sure about the 50 levels of horde... that could be very hard).

Yeah, only a month or so ago Cliff was saying the internal testers couldn't get past something like level 27 to see how the game reacted in the later stages. I wonder if they've sorted out that small problem yet... :whistle:

I'd much rather have 100K over everything than 10K only in ranked matches, though. That way anytime I want to play it, it goes towards the achievement.

Oh definitely, but it's still going to take a long time to do it. Unless of course it's that damn crazy in SP with the big battles. I don't even know how people managed 10K kills in GOW1 so quickly. 4 people on each team and assuming you killed all 4 each time, that's like 2000+ matches :no:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!