Are Blu Ray Players Ever Going to be Cheap?


Recommended Posts

They will drop but not any time soon. Now that they are the only option for HD video, the companies will try to keep the prices high to maximize profits (as I'm assuming making a Blu-Ray player is still costly). Maybe in a year or two prices will start to come down I'd say. Of cause this is only what I think and should be taken with a grain of salt.

Good DVD players still aren't under $100. I'm not making excuses for some of the ridiculously priced players out there, but $100 is not going to happen any time soon.

Huh? There are hundreds of "good" DVD players under $100 in my book. They may not be these massive quality, $1,000 players or whatever, but they get the job done and deliver good pictures and sound.

Nope as there is nothing cheap about any of the tech in it and surrounding it; its all to fresh.

Which leads me to wonder now without further researching, why is it that the PS3 will not recoup most of its developmental costs for a long long time? Is it because of the cell, Blu-Ray or a serious combo of both? Darn it pecks, you got me thinking :p

Huh? There are hundreds of "good" DVD players under $100 in my book. They may not be these massive quality, $1,000 players or whatever, but they get the job done and deliver good pictures and sound.

Totally agree.. a solid upscaling DVD player even from a brand name is around 70 bucks and above. My DVD player was Pioneer and it was solid. Not top of the line of course but solid. I had Denon DVD player that was in $500 range but then again I'm not a regular consumer.

To address your question.. I think you won't see real drops for at least 2 years.. What I can see going on right now is that brand names like Funai and Magnovision or whatever Chinese garbage will *maybe* be sold at around $250 (I'm thinking closer to like $299) this holiday season and they will ALL be Profile 1.1. They just announced I think one more as 1.1 Profile. It seems that licensing of Profile 2.0 is unacceptable for many manufacturers, that's why they are not rushing to release a fully featured product but these half functional units.

Profile 2.0 players with full BD-Live capability (you know the one that actually IS fully featured) won't drop below $400 for a while.

I find it interesting that all the people that have been so vocal about Blu-Ray support are now silent because NOTHING they said came true. Prices are SOARING.. new Yamaha, Panasonic, Samsung Blu-Ray players are all from $500 to $1500. That's finally the round that's finalized with specs.. Samsung is trying to hit a bit lower, but their REAL new player that's worth it is $499 2500 model that's coming out. Sony has the new 350 model. the best you'll see from that player even though it's indeed MUCH better then the 300 model of the same player but is still close to $400.. the best that player will be within next like 2 years will be around $300 this holiday season (if that) and maybe (just maybe) around $250 next year and that's their lowest end player.

If you are asking about prices that would match HD DVD prices.. I think that won't happen for sure for another 2+ years if ever, since considering the latest numbers and sales BD is doomed to stay in niche market IMO.

And it's not even the problem with players as much as it is with movie prices. To pay something $25-$30 that is in bargain bin on DVD for like $6-$8 is completely insane for like 95% of people.

Add to that the new Resolution+ TVs from Toshiba and Sharp and XDE players..I think that consumers who are already plenty satisfied with DVD will have even less reason to upgrade to Blu-Ray.

Don't get me wrong, after everything, I'd LOVE for Blu-Ray to be cheap and everyone to get it. It's certainly good to have that quality replace DVD but the greed, the cartel like behavior from both studios and CE manufacturers almost guarantees BD failure. Add a HUGE increase in Digital Downloads expension from internet TV to a bunch of other stuff and HUGE Microsoft's push for XBL..then PSN, Vudu etc etc.. they even offer full 1080p quality that looks absolutely spectacular. If you haven't tried Vudu, I recommend you do, it will blow your socks off.

You have to give it to the BDA cartel though..they keep pumping new models and pushing Blu-Ray as much as they can despite the fact that they are all losing HUGE amounts of money. They think that if you see 20 models you'll be so impressed with selection that you'll forget about the $400 sticker :)

I think if they reached < $200 players and $19.99 for new HD releases and maybe $14.99 for old movies in HD.. you would see a surge in sales, if they keep it up like this.. it's LaserDisc 2.

It took a long time for DVD players prices to drop. Blu-ray player prices have dropped suprisingly fast.

How's that? First Blu-Ray player from Samsung was $999.. The new model is $499.. the drop that happened simply because they would've lost to HD DVD, simple as that. Competition. Once that was over.. players haven't dropped a cent. Actually they increased in price. Go look at the prices of all new models.. they cost $100-$200 more..not less.

Huh? There are hundreds of "good" DVD players under $100 in my book. They may not be these massive quality, $1,000 players or whatever, but they get the job done and deliver good pictures and sound.

Yeah, I paid about $50 for a Philips region-free player, compatible with DivX/xvid. It doesn't upscale, but it plays pretty much everything, and it's much better than my old RCA DVD player, which cost hundreds of dollars at the time.

To address your question.. I think you won't see real drops for at least 2 years.. What I can see going on right now is that brand names like Funai and Magnovision or whatever Chinese garbage will *maybe* be sold at around $250 (I'm thinking closer to like $299) this holiday season and they will ALL be Profile 1.1. They just announced I think one more as 1.1 Profile. It seems that licensing of Profile 2.0 is unacceptable for many manufacturers, that's why they are not rushing to release a fully featured product but these half functional units.

Yes, of course, the holiday sales where stores raise their prices to $299 :wacko: They're currently available for $278.

http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=9864613

And it's not even the problem with players as much as it is with movie prices. To pay something $25-$30 that is in bargain bin on DVD for like $6-$8 is completely insane for like 95% of people.

Why are you comparing a new release to bargain bin DVD's? Hey look, bargain-bin Stargate on Blu-Ray for only $11.86 http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5555734

And I just gave Stargate as an example because I happen to like that movie. You can find bargain-bin Blu-Rays for $9.86 just have a look at walmart.com

Add to that the new Resolution+ TVs from Toshiba and Sharp and XDE players..I think that consumers who are already plenty satisfied with DVD will have even less reason to upgrade to Blu-Ray.

Yeah, the great XDE players :laugh:

Unfortunately, the player demonstrated offered just "subtle but noticeable sharpening of the image"
http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/18/toshiba...500-dvd-player/
Don't get me wrong, after everything, I'd LOVE for Blu-Ray to be cheap and everyone to get it. It's certainly good to have that quality replace DVD but the greed, the cartel like behavior from both studios and CE manufacturers almost guarantees BD failure. Add a HUGE increase in Digital Downloads expension from internet TV to a bunch of other stuff and HUGE Microsoft's push for XBL..then PSN, Vudu etc etc.. they even offer full 1080p quality that looks absolutely spectacular. If you haven't tried Vudu, I recommend you do, it will blow your socks off.

Maybe you might have the bandwidth to download full HD movies, but most of the world doesn't, especially with major US companies starting to cap usage.

You have to give it to the BDA cartel though..they keep pumping new models and pushing Blu-Ray as much as they can despite the fact that they are all losing HUGE amounts of money. They think that if you see 20 models you'll be so impressed with selection that you'll forget about the $400 sticker :)

Wait, what? are they losing money?, or are they over-charging the consumer like you mentioned earlier with $1500 players? your arguments seem to be on two conflicting extremes.

I think if they reached < $200 players and $19.99 for new HD releases and maybe $14.99 for old movies in HD.. you would see a surge in sales, if they keep it up like this.. it's LaserDisc 2.

Blu-Ray discs are priced relative to DVD's. If a new DVD is $19.99, a BD will be more expensive simply because it has the added value of being in HD. It wouldn't make much sense for the studios to charge the same amount for a single disc DVD and a special-edition DVD version would it? It's the same case with DVD's and BD's.

How's that? First Blu-Ray player from Samsung was $999.. The new model is $499.. the drop that happened simply because they would've lost to HD DVD, simple as that. Competition. Once that was over.. players haven't dropped a cent. Actually they increased in price. Go look at the prices of all new models.. they cost $100-$200 more..not less.

A the beginning of the year, Samsung's $499 player was profile 1.1, and could output 5.1 and had a standard video processor. Their latest player, at the same price, is profile 2.0, outputs 7.1 and supports all audio formats, and has a HQV video processor. It's the same price, but has better features, where's the problem?

Boz for all the banging on you have done about how HD DVD is so great, if the outcome were different and Toshiba didnt have to drop prices down to $100 for a player do you really think that HD DVD players would be so damn cheap?

I dont think so.

As for XDE Players, why would i settle for near HD quality which is totally dependant on the source video not being a crap transfer, when i can have FullHD.

Edited by Richard Hammond
blu ray drives for computers are getting cheaper and cheaper...

QFT. $150 baby!

And whoever says you need $150 for a good, solid DVD player really needs to turn off the computer and go outisde. Into an electronics retail store, preferably.

The thing is hey did drop prices. and had they won they could hadly have done a 400% price increase after.

Wait, what? are they losing money?, or are they over-charging the consumer like you mentioned earlier with $1500 players? your arguments seem to be on two conflicting extremes.

read his post again and don't make up arguments that aren't there. BD is losing money because they aren't able to sell units. So they saturate the market with units to make it appear they are popular so people will buy them at the inflated price.

As for HD content being more expensive. doesn't really matter when 99% of consumers don't care and don't notice the difference between HD and regular anyway. There's also the fact that we pay for the movie not the quality. It's the filming and all that that costs money. And by your logic, lower quality movies such as the failed UMD and such should be lower than DVD, and they weren't really.

And actually most of the world is fine about downloading HD movies. unlike what Sony would like to make people think, even a full quality VC1 movie is not 50gig's, not even 25. And again even so people would rather download SD res movies than spend money buying actual BD's. It's a convenience thing, and in europe a timing thing. Since DVD and BD's are released so late.

Seriously... like $100 or less cheap. You'd think they'd at least start to drop in price by now even slightly, but nope.

?50??? You must be joking! Like others have said, you can't even get a decent DVD player for ?50! The decent DVD players nowadays a consoles!:D:D

If you want to get a decent Blu-Ray player for a low price, wait for the PS3 to drop in price, which will probably happen next year.

But the PS3 isn't a blu ray player first is it.

I don't need another "next gen" console. so why should I pay the overhead for the console functions when I just want a BD player. Which begs the question, why are mere BD players costing more than a gaming console if they aren't inflated.

Nah, if you absolutely want BD, wait untill the players are at least half the price of a console+BD players. And the disks are still expensive.

I don't need another "next gen" console. so why should I pay the overhead for the console functions when I just want a BD player. Which begs the question, why are mere BD players costing more than a gaming console if they aren't inflated.

Because Games consoles are sold at a loss to get the install base high then Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo make money on licensing on the games, they charge developers per disc just for the privilege of putting their game on their console., i dont think some random Chinese manufacturer will make diddly squat on all Blu-Ray discs sold.

i think he meant, drop by $100, not to $100. They are still working on making them smaller, and until they can produce them smaller, faster, and cheaper, the end user will always get screwed.

That's still entirely besides the point. and I'm not entirely sure the PS3 individually is sold below cost anymore. Yeah viewed as a whole. considering the whole development cost of the console, it's still sold below cost. But that has **** to do with comparing prices to pure BD players which in the end use cheaper parts anyway.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!