• 0

Internet Browsers


Which browser do you use?  

174 members have voted

  1. 1. Which browser do you use?

    • Internet Explorer.
      78
    • Netscape.
      1
    • Mozilla.
      29
    • Opera.
      26
    • Phoenix.
      40


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Phoenix for me.

Reasons:

Launches pretty fast.

Doesn't require multiple windows like IE.

Lots of available extensions and addons - Optimoz (mouse gestures), Tab Extensions, Leecher, Image Nuker, etc.

Great visual interface, lots of good skins available.

In active development - bugs get fixed in the nightlies which are released often.

Relatively good compliance with the majority of websites. Haven't run into any serious problems.

Wonderful ability to disable javascript/reloading/plugins/images in a specific tab (useful for pages with auto-reloading banner ads, frames, no-right-click scripts, etc).

Very effective popup blocking.

Now has extension to kill Flash banner ads/popups.

While its still got a ways to go development-wise, I use it, because even at this stage, it kicks IE's a$s in amount of features, skinnability, and customization. I can't wait for the next milestone release. They're changing the name :( :( :( :( *sadness*

But it will always be Phoenix to me.

  • 0

i use mozilla...i use to refuse to use anything else but IE, just because i was so accustomed to it..but sometimes you just have to try things out..so i tried mozilla and although it gave me problems at first i stuck with it, and now i'm so familiar with it i hardly touch IE (only for windows update)...i just think mozilla has an upper hand with it's tab support and mouse gestures..i can't do without them now...

  • 0

opera 7.03, all the way.

i love the speed and customizability of it, as well as the wand feature, the ability to show or block all images on a page, the built-in popup blocking, and low RAM usage.

you want minimal? check the screenshot below. the first button is my Menu (File, Edit, View, etc all drop down when you click it), the second is my favorites list, forward, backward, refresh, the hotlist (not really necessary, but nice), the wand, show/hide images, and the rest you can figure out.

opera = win.

edit: if they can minimize Phoenix's RAM usage and make it more customizable, i might switch. until then, it's opera all the way

  • 0
IE <50% MWAHAHAHA first time ive seen that happen here

It sure as hell isn't true for the entire internet though. My sites (roughly 10k uniques/day combined) show:

IE with 95%

Netscape/Mozilla with 4%

Opera with 0.14%

A ton of spiders/bots....

And Konqueror with 0.02%

Now if I could get ahold of Neowin's apache logs... ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 7-Zip 26.02 by Razvan Serea 7-Zip is a open source file archiver with a high compression ratio. The program supports 7z, XZ, BZIP2, GZIP, TAR, ZIP, WIM, ARJ, CAB, CHM, CPIO, CramFS, DEB, DMG, FAT, HFS, ISO, LZH, LZMA, MBR, MSI, NSIS, NTFS, RAR, RPM, SquashFS, UDF, VHD, WIM, XAR, Z. Most of the source code is under the GNU LGPL license. The unRAR code is under a mixed license: GNU LGPL + unRAR restrictions. Check license information here: 7-Zip license. You can use 7-Zip on any computer, including a computer in a commercial organization. You don't need to register or pay for 7-Zip. The main features of 7-Zip are: High compression ratio in 7z format with LZMA compression Compression ratio for ZIP and GZIP formats: 2-10 % better than the ratio provided by PKZip and WinZip Strong AES-256 encryption in 7z and ZIP formats Self-extracting capability for 7z format Integration with Windows Shell Powerful File Manager Powerful command line version Plugin for FAR Manager Localizations for 74 languages 7-Zip 26.02 changelog: Some bugs and vulnerabilities were fixed. Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (64-bit) | 1.6 MB (Open Source) Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (32-bit) | 1.3 MB Download: 7-Zip 26.02 (ARM64) | 1.5 MB View: 7-Zip Website | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Blast from the past.
    • Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!