Stalker Clear Sky - Most disappointing game of 2008?


Recommended Posts

Atmosphere is what Clear Sky most critically lacks, and why it could be the most disappointing PC game of 2008.

... it just doesn't seem to realise what made STALKER great. Instead, it's a hotchpotch of repeated set-pieces, most too similar or too cursory, and ideas clumsily purloined from other games. Oh God, and the dialogue. Without irony, Russian mercenaries speak like Tim Westwood and Levi Roots, all in English with heavy Soviet accenting, so the game comes off like a bad impressions show. There's deeply amateurish sense of what's cool and what's funny to it, and an overwhelming concern that the developers are lacking vital quality control now they're unshackled from the first game's publisher, THQ. It sounds horribly presumptive but it really does come across as though a bunch of fairly inexperienced designers were let loose on this game with no-one in place to overrule their worst excesses. How upsetting if so ? that Stalker's brilliance may have been a result of US publisher interference and not, after all, a team of Ukrainian developer-heroes defying the odds.

http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/906/906864p1.html

I hope Fallout 3 doesn't completely suck.:(:(

None of that is why I am waiting for Clear Sky, its the graphics and technology behind it. I could give 2 ****s about the story and set-pieces etc.

And yea, Fonze is correct, something with much more buzz would be the most disappointing game, not one without much buzz.

The original game was exceptional - I'm playing through it again to get the proper ending, as I only managed one of the alternate endings. The atmosphere in the underground areas was amazing... easily the most atmospheric / scariest game I've played. I will almost certainly be getting Clear Sky on Steam (providing it's not crazily priced like Call Of Duty 4). The original had / has lots of issues and flaws yet it still turned out to be a really great game and this looks to be the same. The only thing that's a bit disconcerting is that the graphics improvements are apparently demanding on top-end systems, and it's not as if the original was easy going - I'm hoping it will run as well as Stalker did except with visual improvements but that's seeming less likely.

So yes, I'm expecting problems / issues but still for there to be a really good game under it all. It's the only first person coming out this year that I'm really interested in, what with Project Origin being bumped back till next year.

I don't think a game that didn't get much buzz could be the most disappointing game. I'd say more like Too Human, Alone in the Dark, etc.

Hit the nail right on the head! (Y) Alone in the Dark was very disappointing. Bad controls, and even worse driving sequences. Too Human is worse. This is a game that has been in development since 1999, and it has ended up a huge dissapointment. :(

None of that is why I am waiting for Clear Sky, its the graphics and technology behind it. I could give 2 ****s about the story and set-pieces etc

See, this is exactly why we get this type of games these days: http://www.mazapan.se/games/BurnTheRope.php

No decent story, gameplay or a reason to play it again after you finished with it.

Just pretty graphics, for the console kiddies.

See, this is exactly why we get this type of games these days: http://www.mazapan.se/games/BurnTheRope.php

No decent story, gameplay or a reason to play it again after you finished with it.

Just pretty graphics, for the console kiddies.

I don't understand a thing you said, but if you are calling me a console kiddy, I don't have a single console, nor have I had one for 11 years, pc gaming here thanks.

See, this is exactly why we get this type of games these days: http://www.mazapan.se/games/BurnTheRope.php

No decent story, gameplay or a reason to play it again after you finished with it.

STALKER had a great story, great gameplay and because of the multiple endings and RPG elements you actually had a reason to play it again. Clear Sky just looks to pair that with a stunning graphics engine. Game like STALKER and Far Cry 2 are where first person shooters should be heading - open areas, RPG elements, day/night cycles, graeat graphics, factions, etc.

Eh I didn't expect much from it. The original Stalker was something I really wanted to like, but it was just below the mark.

No decent story, gameplay or a reason to play it again after you finished with it.

Just pretty graphics, for the console kiddies..

Why do you use the term "console kiddies"? You're arguing with a PC gamer about a PC game, it doesn't make sense to say it's for "console kiddies".

Eh I didn't expect much from it. The original Stalker was something I really wanted to like, but it was just below the mark.

Why do you use the term "console kiddies"? You're arguing with a PC gamer about a PC game, it doesn't make sense to say it's for "console kiddies".

Thanks for the backup lol

Why do you use the term "console kiddies"? You're arguing with a PC gamer about a PC game, it doesn't make sense to say it's for "console kiddies".

I used that term to put him in an average console gamers group - that is kids in their twelve, got attention span of three seconds and get games with pretty graphics and no real content, just because their mommy want to shut them up for half a hour.

And I wasn't referring to "Shadow of Chernobyl" or "Clear Sky" [theyarecomingforyou,] in my example (this one) for "games these days". I was referring to his statement; "I could give 2 ****s about the story and set-pieces etc".

I was disappointed by the first game, i played it to the end but by half way it was repetitive and boring. I even found a place to "camp" npcs with a certain gun type so i could get loads of ammo.

I dont see myself picking up clear skys unless it comes as a free download with a graphics card or other peripheral i get

Will there be a demo for this game?

Don't want to spend up just to find out it's a letdown (like the original STALKER) was to me.

Either way. I'm more likely to get Fallout 3 or that new Crysis game before I consider Clear Sky.

Edited by splicer707

Well, I'm really psyched for this game. Been waiting all summer for it. I hate hearing negitive reviews before the game is even out. I liked SoC and played it for hours. I never got into the power plant, but it was still fun and looked really cool. I like these kind of games more for the atmosphere than the actual game play. I'm still hoping it will be playable and more visually stunning in DX10.

just my 2 cents. :)

To me, S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl was a big letdown. I had high expectations for the game because there was so much buzz around it on the internet. I figured it would be a great game. Thankfully, I didn't waste money on buying it. I tried the game at a friend's house and stopped playing after half an hour. The gameplay and graphics were subpar and the storyline seemed so bland. Also, performance was an issue. The frame rate would drop for no reason at all.

I feel that S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky will also be a disappointment. Sure, the graphics may be better with the support of DirectX 10 but that means it'll perform worse. Currently, there isn't a single DirectX 10 game on the market that performs better than its DirectX 9 counterpart. And reviews say that the "atmosphere" isn't as good as the original. I've decided to skip out on this one and I suggest you do the same (if you agree with what I said).

The original STALKER was a letdown. The new Stalker apparently isn't that different from the first. Ergo, letdown. I'm sure it'll have some improvements, but the makers just couldn't nail it.

Oh no I was actually going to get both Clear Sky and Shadows of Chernobyl together. But after so many negative reviews, I think I have to skip both.

If there is ever a deal on them, get them, many people say letdown, it's not that bad, still worth a play at least.

Story

If you want to play Stalker: Clear Sky with all details in DX 10 a t a resolution of 1,680 x 1,050, you will have to use a multi GPU solution. If you don't need high framerates you can do with Geforce GTX 280 or a Radeon HD 4870. At 1,280 x 1,024 a Geforce 8800 GTX, 9800 GTX+ or a HD 4850 do quite well, but you will have to go down to 1,024 x 768 to make them display the game really smooth.

Sorry but that's totally insane.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!