Stalker Clear Sky - Most disappointing game of 2008?


Recommended Posts

Atmosphere is what Clear Sky most critically lacks, and why it could be the most disappointing PC game of 2008.

... it just doesn't seem to realise what made STALKER great. Instead, it's a hotchpotch of repeated set-pieces, most too similar or too cursory, and ideas clumsily purloined from other games. Oh God, and the dialogue. Without irony, Russian mercenaries speak like Tim Westwood and Levi Roots, all in English with heavy Soviet accenting, so the game comes off like a bad impressions show. There's deeply amateurish sense of what's cool and what's funny to it, and an overwhelming concern that the developers are lacking vital quality control now they're unshackled from the first game's publisher, THQ. It sounds horribly presumptive but it really does come across as though a bunch of fairly inexperienced designers were let loose on this game with no-one in place to overrule their worst excesses. How upsetting if so ? that Stalker's brilliance may have been a result of US publisher interference and not, after all, a team of Ukrainian developer-heroes defying the odds.

http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/906/906864p1.html

I hope Fallout 3 doesn't completely suck.:(:(

None of that is why I am waiting for Clear Sky, its the graphics and technology behind it. I could give 2 ****s about the story and set-pieces etc.

And yea, Fonze is correct, something with much more buzz would be the most disappointing game, not one without much buzz.

The original game was exceptional - I'm playing through it again to get the proper ending, as I only managed one of the alternate endings. The atmosphere in the underground areas was amazing... easily the most atmospheric / scariest game I've played. I will almost certainly be getting Clear Sky on Steam (providing it's not crazily priced like Call Of Duty 4). The original had / has lots of issues and flaws yet it still turned out to be a really great game and this looks to be the same. The only thing that's a bit disconcerting is that the graphics improvements are apparently demanding on top-end systems, and it's not as if the original was easy going - I'm hoping it will run as well as Stalker did except with visual improvements but that's seeming less likely.

So yes, I'm expecting problems / issues but still for there to be a really good game under it all. It's the only first person coming out this year that I'm really interested in, what with Project Origin being bumped back till next year.

I don't think a game that didn't get much buzz could be the most disappointing game. I'd say more like Too Human, Alone in the Dark, etc.

Hit the nail right on the head! (Y) Alone in the Dark was very disappointing. Bad controls, and even worse driving sequences. Too Human is worse. This is a game that has been in development since 1999, and it has ended up a huge dissapointment. :(

None of that is why I am waiting for Clear Sky, its the graphics and technology behind it. I could give 2 ****s about the story and set-pieces etc

See, this is exactly why we get this type of games these days: http://www.mazapan.se/games/BurnTheRope.php

No decent story, gameplay or a reason to play it again after you finished with it.

Just pretty graphics, for the console kiddies.

See, this is exactly why we get this type of games these days: http://www.mazapan.se/games/BurnTheRope.php

No decent story, gameplay or a reason to play it again after you finished with it.

Just pretty graphics, for the console kiddies.

I don't understand a thing you said, but if you are calling me a console kiddy, I don't have a single console, nor have I had one for 11 years, pc gaming here thanks.

See, this is exactly why we get this type of games these days: http://www.mazapan.se/games/BurnTheRope.php

No decent story, gameplay or a reason to play it again after you finished with it.

STALKER had a great story, great gameplay and because of the multiple endings and RPG elements you actually had a reason to play it again. Clear Sky just looks to pair that with a stunning graphics engine. Game like STALKER and Far Cry 2 are where first person shooters should be heading - open areas, RPG elements, day/night cycles, graeat graphics, factions, etc.

Eh I didn't expect much from it. The original Stalker was something I really wanted to like, but it was just below the mark.

No decent story, gameplay or a reason to play it again after you finished with it.

Just pretty graphics, for the console kiddies..

Why do you use the term "console kiddies"? You're arguing with a PC gamer about a PC game, it doesn't make sense to say it's for "console kiddies".

Eh I didn't expect much from it. The original Stalker was something I really wanted to like, but it was just below the mark.

Why do you use the term "console kiddies"? You're arguing with a PC gamer about a PC game, it doesn't make sense to say it's for "console kiddies".

Thanks for the backup lol

Why do you use the term "console kiddies"? You're arguing with a PC gamer about a PC game, it doesn't make sense to say it's for "console kiddies".

I used that term to put him in an average console gamers group - that is kids in their twelve, got attention span of three seconds and get games with pretty graphics and no real content, just because their mommy want to shut them up for half a hour.

And I wasn't referring to "Shadow of Chernobyl" or "Clear Sky" [theyarecomingforyou,] in my example (this one) for "games these days". I was referring to his statement; "I could give 2 ****s about the story and set-pieces etc".

I was disappointed by the first game, i played it to the end but by half way it was repetitive and boring. I even found a place to "camp" npcs with a certain gun type so i could get loads of ammo.

I dont see myself picking up clear skys unless it comes as a free download with a graphics card or other peripheral i get

Will there be a demo for this game?

Don't want to spend up just to find out it's a letdown (like the original STALKER) was to me.

Either way. I'm more likely to get Fallout 3 or that new Crysis game before I consider Clear Sky.

Edited by splicer707

Well, I'm really psyched for this game. Been waiting all summer for it. I hate hearing negitive reviews before the game is even out. I liked SoC and played it for hours. I never got into the power plant, but it was still fun and looked really cool. I like these kind of games more for the atmosphere than the actual game play. I'm still hoping it will be playable and more visually stunning in DX10.

just my 2 cents. :)

To me, S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl was a big letdown. I had high expectations for the game because there was so much buzz around it on the internet. I figured it would be a great game. Thankfully, I didn't waste money on buying it. I tried the game at a friend's house and stopped playing after half an hour. The gameplay and graphics were subpar and the storyline seemed so bland. Also, performance was an issue. The frame rate would drop for no reason at all.

I feel that S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky will also be a disappointment. Sure, the graphics may be better with the support of DirectX 10 but that means it'll perform worse. Currently, there isn't a single DirectX 10 game on the market that performs better than its DirectX 9 counterpart. And reviews say that the "atmosphere" isn't as good as the original. I've decided to skip out on this one and I suggest you do the same (if you agree with what I said).

The original STALKER was a letdown. The new Stalker apparently isn't that different from the first. Ergo, letdown. I'm sure it'll have some improvements, but the makers just couldn't nail it.

Oh no I was actually going to get both Clear Sky and Shadows of Chernobyl together. But after so many negative reviews, I think I have to skip both.

If there is ever a deal on them, get them, many people say letdown, it's not that bad, still worth a play at least.

Story

If you want to play Stalker: Clear Sky with all details in DX 10 a t a resolution of 1,680 x 1,050, you will have to use a multi GPU solution. If you don't need high framerates you can do with Geforce GTX 280 or a Radeon HD 4870. At 1,280 x 1,024 a Geforce 8800 GTX, 9800 GTX+ or a HD 4850 do quite well, but you will have to go down to 1,024 x 768 to make them display the game really smooth.

Sorry but that's totally insane.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!