Stalker Clear Sky - Most disappointing game of 2008?


Recommended Posts

I dunno about this, but I never finished the first game because I'm not so keen on games that needs a lot of work and going back and forth between areas, so I dunno If I'm gonna play this one unless it gets high praise by a lot of people.

None of that is why I am waiting for Clear Sky, its the graphics and technology behind it. I could give 2 ****s about the story and set-pieces etc.

And yea, Fonze is correct, something with much more buzz would be the most disappointing game, not one without much buzz.

What's the point of playing it? just so you can drool at the visuals and then uninstall it?

for me I enjoyed the exploring part of the first game, all those ruined buildings to check out and find the secrets and other stuff, thats what made it fun for me, i'm on my 3rd run through and still haven't found everything or completed all the missions. I'm hoping when csky pops through the letter box it'll be just as entertaining!

True the engine is impressive but thats not why you play a game, you play it to enjoy the whole thing.

I really liked Stalker, but it did have its flaws. It did run well on pretty high settings on my Mac Book Pro (BootCamped, not virtualized) so I look forward to trying Clear Sky. It is more of an add-on and not a prequel though right? I mean I understand this story takes place prior to the events of the original, but is it a full game game or more of a stand alone expansion?

I just spent 4 hours in the first STALKER, trying to finally beat it before I play the name game, but still not finished.

I guess it's a good thing Steam hasn't released Clearsky yet lmao

My mate loved the first STALKER but he said Clear Sky was basically a "half-game".

I loved the first game as well, mainly the story about it, and the story about the real thing. I watched and seen every different ending. This game I don't think is a half-game but I also wouldn't call it the second game, IE prologue.

I tried and tried to play through Stalker. I loved a lot of things about it, the atmosphere was great as were the RPG elements...heck I didn't even mind the gameplay which alot of people complained was too difficult and wonky. But in the end it had too many short comings. I have installed it at least a half dozen times, since I bought it when it was pretty well brand new, and still haven't been able to play the entire way through. Too many issues that bring the game down, from inconsistent performance and various bugs...one that was especially bad was that the last time I played quests would not complete.

Too bad, it had a lot of ambition but needed more time before being released imo.

At any rate I will avoid Clear Skies.

how the hell are you suppose to do the section where you come out the tunnel, and the guy says, that im outside an army base? i keep on getting gunned down by the turret gun

Go back to the swamps and walk north, there is another entrance there.

I tried and tried to play through Stalker. I loved a lot of things about it, the atmosphere was great as were the RPG elements...heck I didn't even mind the gameplay which alot of people complained was too difficult and wonky. But in the end it had too many short comings. I have installed it at least a half dozen times, since I bought it when it was pretty well brand new, and still haven't been able to play the entire way through. Too many issues that bring the game down, from inconsistent performance and various bugs...one that was especially bad was that the last time I played quests would not complete.

Too bad, it had a lot of ambition but needed more time before being released imo.

At any rate I will avoid Clear Skies.

Took me a long time and many installs to finish the game as well, but it was still an amazing game, and I enjoy the environment and story. (more the story of the real place but still).

how the hell are you suppose to do the section where you come out the tunnel, and the guy says, that im outside an army base? i keep on getting gunned down by the turret gun

Couldn't find the north entrance, but when I went back ain daylight it was easy. At night there were patrols out, daytime there weren't.

Took me a long time and many installs to finish the game as well, but it was still an amazing game, and I enjoy the environment and story. (more the story of the real place but still).

Yes, the setting is what first really intrigued me. That area has always held a a strange alure to me. Theres some great docu's on the surrounding area and Pripyat in particular. Theres still some people that live around there that refused to leave their homes...very eerie and a perfect setting for a game.

Well, to be honest i thought it was a great game, and i dont know what you mean by a lack of atmosphere, i finished it just today too, very good game, bit of a sudden ending but seeing as ive played SoC through im not disappointed by it. Im gonna play through again on the hardest setting for a bit of a laugh (And many many deaths). My one problem is the lack of underground 'Dungeon' style areas.

Wow, I downloaded this from steam and tried playing it, it barely runs on minimum settings for me.

I have an amd 3700 - overclocked to 2.6ghz, x1950 pro, etc.

But I turned everything to minimum, even sound, and it still lags. :/

Wow, I downloaded this from steam and tried playing it, it barely runs on minimum settings for me.

I have an amd 3700 - overclocked to 2.6ghz, x1950 pro, etc.

But I turned everything to minimum, even sound, and it still lags. :/

Yea many people having issues with it, some don't. I have a much better system than yours (older one then in my sig) and it has issues as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!