Recommended Posts

Yeah, who the hell needs competition? Would be best if all Windows user were stuck at IE6.

That's not my point. Competition between two browsers is already more than enough. We already have Opera, no? Imagine the web developers has to code for four different browsers. What works in one browser might not work fully in another.

well i read it and found it pretty informative. if you dont care, then just ignore the post rather than making another reply?

Only reason I mentioned it is because he's linked to his blog in every Chrome-related thread and article I've seen on here.

That's not my point. Competition between two browsers is already more than enough. We already have Opera, no? Imagine the web developers has to code for four different browsers. What works in one browser might not work fully in another.

Which is why a little thing called standards compliance is important.

Imagine the web developers has to code for four different browsers. What works in one browser might not work fully in another.

Now imagine the choice of five or six standard compliant browsers versus one or two non-compliant. The user base will naturally want to use the ones that are compliant, forcing the improvement of the other non-compliant ones.

The web developer won't need to code for "four different browsers" if they're all compliant. Competition is the only thing forcing them to improve, because no one wants users to switch from their browser to a "better one".

couple things.

how do i add a home button?

-speed wise i notice a very small difference.

-the ui gives the page more screen space and looks really smooth.

-any web developers on here right click on something and click the "inspect element" button.

so far i find it the greatest feature...i was stunned.

home button is under options > add home button to the tools bar

So, I will not be using Google Chrome. I despise programs that will take file associations (which yes I allowed) but then will not restore them if I ask it.

So you despise a program because its first beta release has bugs?

I don't like bad bugs like that, but I don't despise a program just because its first beta release has bad bugs.

So you despise a program because its first beta release has bugs?

I don't like bad bugs like that, but I don't despise a program just because its first beta release has bad bugs.

Firefox used to do this (in a pre 1.0 release), and so did Opera, it's a common annoyance which is always fixed (hopefully)

like safari, without the blurry font rendering and is quicker, simpler ui

My thts exactly!! I love the crisp font, spell checker and UI.. status bar is cool and it is faster overall compared to IE7, including the page loading speed. Chrome looks sooooooo cool with Aero!! :yes: Can't wait for the full version now..

My thts exactly!! I love the crisp font, spell checker and UI.. status bar is cool and it is faster overall compared to IE7, including the page loading speed. Chrome looks sooooooo cool with Aero!! :yes: Can't wait for the full version now..

What's with the crisp font everyone's talking about? It's the default Windows ClearType.

I think my expectations were too high. Its really quick and clean, but I was expecting more. Hopefully there will be more soon. Like the ability to save my passwords. That is key.

...it does save passwords, it uses the same prompt system as firefox 3.

Go to Google.com (so it stores the site name in history), and next time you try visiting it through the address bar just type the letter g, then press TAB and then your keyword. Same goes for Wikipedia and similar sites.

when I type letter w and press TAB, I got only wikipedia.org in the address bar, while the focus changed to some elements in the page. Same goes with typing g and press TAB, google.com shows in the address bar, and the focus changed to something in the page (just like a normal TAB navigation).

Any idea? :x

The search engine presets are win. I love how I can set each engine to a keyword and search for it faster.

For example, if I set Wikipedia to the keyword 'w', all I would have to type in the address bar is 'w Hillary Clinton' and it would take me to Hillary's Wikipedia article.

I just wish I could get a decent favorites list. I'm getting tired of pressing Ctrl+B just to see the list.

Edited by Ruiz
It doesnt like my router home page. 192.168.1.1. If I try to log in it just keeps asking for the username and password again. Firefox gets me in first time.

Work fine on me.

The search engine presets are win. I love how I can set each engine to a keyword and search for it faster.

For example, if I set Wikipedia to the keyword 'w', all I would have to type in the address bar is 'w Hillary Clinton' and it would take me to Hillary's Wikipedia article.

Sad, doesn't work on me (AH "keyword" i miss read! now i know)

The search engine presets are win. I love how I can set each engine to a keyword and search for it faster.

For example, if I set Wikipedia to the keyword 'w', all I would have to type in the address bar is 'w Hillary Clinton' and it would take me to Hillary's Wikipedia article.

I do agree that this is a rocking feature...

But you know that you can do that in FF too right?

Right click on a search box input field (e.g. Neowin up there in the right corner) and "Add a keyword for this search". The "Keyword" field then will be this "w" you mention for Wikipedia... It really is a huge usability win.

In other news, some German thread notices that Chrome seems to talk to this IP 74.125.97.22 which belong to Google. Not sure how valid this information is and the method used... Can you guys somehow confirm/deny this? Here is the original post for you German speakers: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/foren/S-74-...d/showthread-1/

I've read this post from Matt Cutts too http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-chrome-communication/ but it caught my attention.

Thoughts?

Indeed, the search feature is turning out to be really handy. Initial usage is turning out to be quite enjoyable.

Hey, its not Firefox (here I'm thinking of extensions) nor Internet Explorer (here I'm thinking, thank god), but the experience overall is good.

One little gripe (is it?) is that I can't find anywhere that indicates the status of the loading progress (You know 'Transferring Data', '15/483 pictures loaded', etc). With especially slow and shaky dial up connections where I am now, I can't trust the loading of a page until I see the status in the (hey) status bar.

Am I missing something here?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
    • OpenAI is making Codex more useful in Chrome and the cloud by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI's Codex now has more than 5 million users, up nearly 4x from earlier this year. To further accelerate Codex's growth among developers, OpenAI today announced that it has agreed to acquire Ona, a company that builds secure cloud execution and orchestration technology for developers. Ona will enable developers to run Codex with persistent and controlled cloud infrastructure for long-running agentic workflows. Right now, most Codex execution happens locally on developers' laptops and PCs, and the agents work continuously for hours. Through Ona, OpenAI aims to make Codex agents keep working for days without being tied to a user’s local machine or an active session. This will be an important capability for enterprises that want to deploy AI agents in production while maintaining control over infrastructure, data, security boundaries, credential scope, logging, and review workflows. Like any acquisition, the deal is still subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Until the deal closes, OpenAI and Ona will continue to operate as separate companies. After closing, Ona’s team will join the Codex team to improve developer workflows. Alongside the Ona acquisition announcement, OpenAI today introduced a few Codex updates. Developers can now save Codex rate limit resets and use them later instead of losing them when they are not needed immediately. OpenAI is also adding a referral option where users can invite a friend to Codex and get a saved rate limit reset. OpenAI today also announced a developer mode for browser use in Chrome and the Codex in-app browser. With this mode, Codex can use the Chrome DevTools Protocol to debug web apps, inspect pages, and work more directly with browser-based development workflows. Developers can use this when they want Codex to profile JavaScript, inspect console output and network traffic, examine web page states including the DOM and applied styles, and more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      186
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!