Recommended Posts

Well, it's been about forever and a day since I posted but here are my thoughts. :)

I actually really like it and it is fast on both my desktop and my laptop. I like how it looks and performs. I know it's only a short time before someone writes an ad-block type of add-in for it. I just can't surf the web without Firefox + Adblock.

I however don't like the part of the Chrome EULA that I have put below (specifically the bold part):

(The following was taken verbatim from the Google Chrome EULA.)

11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services.

11.2 You agree that this license includes a right for Google to make such Content available to other companies, organizations or individuals with whom Google has relationships for the provision of syndicated services, and to use such Content in connection with the provision of those services.

That is actually part of the EULA for any Google service, be it YouTube, Google Maps, GMail...

Hmm......so does that mean that Google could "modify" a blog that someone has on Blogger.com and and that person can't do jack about it? What if Google would then take someone's video from YouTube and modify it and repost it?

That would suck.

Hmm......so does that mean that Google could "modify" a blog that someone has on Blogger.com and and that person can't do jack about it? What if Google would then take someone's video from YouTube and modify it and repost it?

That would suck.

Well, it also gives them the rights to modify content for mobile devices and to insert ads.

That is actually part of the EULA for any Google service, be it YouTube, Google Maps, GMail...

*sigh*...which I didn't realize, and have now subsequently spent the better part of the afternoon transferring most of my subscriptions and account information to another email account. =/

I seriously doubt google monitors ALL people using chrome. They would need a second internet to handle all the meta-traffict! Besides, the EULA is very unclear, but I bet they can't "modify" your blog at their will, or read and reproduce your emails. That's part of your privacy, and the generic-EULA for "google services" (the one that you have to agree to download chrome) says that "unless specified otherwise by the agreements of the specific services". Surely there is a clause in the gmail EULA that prevents them from doing whatever they want with your emails.

I sincerely hope that they'll change the clause though. Knowing them, if enough buzz is generated against it, they will change it.

Before you guys get your panties in a bunch they are fixing the EULA:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080...-change-it.html

So, there you have it: a tempest in a (chrome) teapot. Not that it's the only one; as Ina Fried of News.com points out, Chrome's "Omnibar" can also access all keystrokes a user types, and Google will store some of this information along with IP addresses.

damn....i see a bad future in terms of privacy, in a general way.

so sad.

it's FAST.... I have a real problem with firefox and IE when it comes to speed... it's usually pretty good, but when i go to check my email (hotmail) they just slow me down soo much while browsing from folder to folder. chrome flies through them. I don't know if it's downloading the information in the background just incase I click on on the links, or what.... but t's really fast.

I would rate Chrome 2/10 for a beta.

I've been involved in many betas and I must say, this is the least exciting one I have seen.

Three features I was looking forward to in Chrome

1) Security

2) Totally separate threads

3) Compatibility with other google products.

Well, for security apparently there is a big security flaw that webkit suffers from that they didn't fix.

I was looking forward to being able to have multiple google accounts open on separate program threads, alas this is not so.

Cannot install google toolbar? What? Need I say more.

The only thing it has going for it is the fast startup loading.

Well when I installed it on my PC i thought it was okay.

Main bug I have with it, is that if I scroll down a webpage I cann't scroll up using mouse wheel :/

I'm using XP Home SP2.

Other problem i have with my laptops is that the installer won't open. Chrome setup loads then exits straight away, using XP Pro SP3 Samsung and XP Pro SP2 on an HP Laptop.

Yes I know it's beta, but I would never use it as a normal browser as Google can get away with problems saying "it's in beta what do you expect" but everything google has made (other then search engine) stays in beta for years and years, eg Gmail & Picasa and other things.

Think i'll be sticking with Firefox, but as I'm a web developer, i've got to use all browsers, boo :(

Pros for me

- Fast at rendering pages, JS etc

- Very clean UI

- Options are clear and concise

- Built in spell check (love it, so many typos which i make too often)

- Speed of application launch

- Create application shortcuts

- Search functionality

Wish list (as this is a beta after all)

- Extensions (which ties me to FF for now)

- Ad block

- Weather

- Gmail

- Ok every useful extension i can think off and FF has hundreds!

- Integrated Google Apps such as Gmail etc

- And i really really wish Google would release some official sync softwar for mobiles/cells so i can ditch Outlook/Sony Ericsson.......!

- Control over the UI, it needs to be thinner like FF so it lets me use folders as drop down favourites tool bars!

Other then that i think for a starter, my appetite is plenty wet!!!

-

post-15394-1220560264_thumb.jpg

Chrome looks promising but a few things are making me stay with Firefox, mainly Ubiquity and customization abilities. Oh, and I really don't like the default look under XP; those buttons at the top right look weird. I will definitly keep an eye on future releases though.

Will easily replace FF for me. Great speed, great UI. If your hobby is modding your browser with a bunch of extensions this isn't for you. Its all about getting back to basics.

Yeah but if you're old enough to remember the "basics" they didn't involve ads. I'm about the "old school" internet where there were no ads. If I can't block ads with a browser I don't want it. :)

Yeah but if you're old enough to remember the "basics" they didn't involve ads. I'm about the "old school" internet where there were no ads. If I can't block ads with a browser I don't want it. :)

You can block ads with chrome, you just have to be a bit more creative about it.

Hint: Hosts file and an app called "Homer" to serve up blank images in place of said ads.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They thought value of their goods would forever only drop like it used to and didn't account for sudden increase in price because of all the Ai hype. Tough luck Samsung, don't try to weasel this one out. Also American customer protection laws are a**. In Europe, you need to be compensated for a functioning product of same or better characteristics (not same price point as when it was originally bought!) if it can't be repaired and when you receive a replacement product your warranty starts from scratch because you received a different item than you previously had and old warranty thus cannot apply to it anymore. If your actual item was successfully repaired, warranty gets extended for the period the item was in service. If item is repaired to a significant extent, warranty also starts over from scratch because major part of it was replaced. Americans need to fight to get this kind of consumer protections because they are constantly getting screwed over.
    • Microsoft releases new Windows 11 Media Creation Tool with the latest updates by Taras Buria Patch Tuesday updates arrive every month, bringing users new features and security updates. To make sure customers have access to the most recent images, Microsoft also releases updates to the Media Creation Tool app, its official utility for Windows 11 installation. Today, the company pushed new ISOs to Media Creation Tool, allowing you to create images with the June 2026 Patch Tuesday updates. With the latest update, the Media Creation Tool now downloads KB5094126. It is Windows 11 version 25H2, build 26200.8655, which is also available via Windows Update. Note that the app itself remains on the previous version, which you can check in Properties > Details. The only change is that it now downloads a more recent Windows 11 build, so the only way to check is to download an ISO. The June 2026 Patch Tuesday update is a special release for Windows 11, as it brings a new performance profile to make the operating system more responsive and snappier when rendering various user interface surfaces, including the Start menu, quick settings, and more. It does so by spiking processor speeds for a brief moment, resulting in higher loads for a second or two. The so-called “Low latency profile” is rolling out gradually, but you can force-enable it with the ViVeTool app. Other changes include webcam improvements, Task Manager updates, shared audio support, and more. You can download the Media Creation Tool app from the official Microsoft website using this link. Besides MCT, Microsoft lets you download Windows 11 ISO as a file directly from the official Windows 11 website. However, you will need a third-party app to write it to your USB drive. Check out this guide if you want to know how to do that.
    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!