Fair? Unfair? Legal? Illegal?


Recommended Posts

Ok.. today we had a back to school assembly and we basically went over the rules again for our school. In the middle of this, our VP said that "E-Bullying" was a concern of his(even though it doesn't really go on) and that he was going to check through every single kids' myspace(at least 9th grade[and our school is only about 600]) and report pretty much everything to the parents. (Vulgarity, people drinking, photos, anything). Do you guys think that this is right or better yet, legal?

P.S. He said that he had a webmaster so he can see even private profiles.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/665170-fair-unfair-legal-illegal/
Share on other sites

I still think e-bullying should just be reported by the victim just like any other case of bullying, the school is taking it to the extreme here. It's still a massive invasion of privacy. If my school did this I'd set my profile pic as a giant middle finger with the VP's name at the bottom. :laugh:

E-Bullying is something that typically happens to fellow students. Even if it happens on private property, the school has some responsibility to end the bullying.

They have nothing. It's like getting in a fight with a fellow student at a mall 20 miles from school and being suspended for it. It doesn't work.

EDIT: Yeah Stevo, we already have a bulletin going around telling him to eff off. lol and I'ma put his name in big letters and is gay next to it. haha

They have nothing. It's like getting in a fight with a fellow student at a mall 20 miles from school and being suspended for it. It doesn't work.

EDIT: Yeah Stevo, we already have a bulletin going around telling him to eff off. lol and I'ma put his name in big letters and is gay next to it. haha

Haha...except I've actually seen that happen.

P.S. He said that he had a webmaster so he can see even private profiles.

:laugh: Bunch of garbage right there. MySpace has patched any holes that allowed people to see private profiles and pictures, as I haven't seen anything about any vulnerabilities in ages. If you really want to be secure, just make sure your pictures are set to private as well as your profile.

However, this is completely fair and legal. If it's on the web, it's available for all to see, whether it be available intentionally or unintentionally. You put it up there, you can't completely expect it to be safe, even if you're told it will be. If you don't want somebody finding out things you've done, don't post it anywhere online. It's that simple.

Pupils punished over Facebook comments

Five Grade 8ers bumped from end-of-year trip after ridiculing their teachers

Apr 30, 2007 04:30 AM

THERESA BOYLE

STAFF REPORTER

At least five Grade 8 students from a Thornhill school have been banned from an end-of-the-year trip to Montreal after disparaging remarks about teachers appeared on the Internet.

"We were just joking around. Nothing we said was meant to cause others harm," Bram Koch, a 14-year-old student from Willowbrook Public School, said last week.

Last Dec. 11, Bram wrote a message to friends on the popular website Facebook.com, a social networking service, joking that he thought he'd seen a teacher masturbating.

"I could've sworn I saw ... sitting in the back of the room rubbing herself," the message said, naming a female science instructor.

Bram said there were up to 30 students conversing on the Facebook site. Some were on the site anonymously.

Other derogatory remarks were made about teachers, including one about a phys-ed teacher who "gives masturbating tips," he said.

Letters about "misuse of the Internet" were last week sent to parents of about 20 students at Willowbrook by principal Kelly Fassel. Parents were asked to meet with her about their children's conduct and that's where at least five of the students found out they were no longer welcome on next month's two-day trip to Montreal.

Bram said he had no idea that anyone else could read the remarks: "I didn't think it would be so public. I was just writing it to my friends. I didn't expect that the teachers would get involved and that they would be reading this."

Fassel did not return a call from the Star.

The Internet musings of students is a growing problem for school administrators.

Just last month, five students at Birchmount Park Collegiate in Scarborough were suspended for writing inappropriate remarks about staff at the school on Facebook. A subsequent protest over the suspensions led to the arrests of four others at the school when police were allegedly pelted with objects.

In February, 19 students from Robert F. Hall Catholic Secondary School in Caledon East were suspended after complaining about school policies on Facebook.

Robert Dunn, a superintendent with the York Region District School Board, said he could not discuss individual students, but noted that any violation of Willowbrook's safe schools policy is subject to discipline.

Students are made aware of the policy at the beginning of the school year, when they are asked to take it home, read it, sign it and have their parents do the same, he said.

A specific section of the policy deals with Internet use and reads: "Misconduct carried out over the Internet may be subject to school discipline, whether carried out at home, at a school or elsewhere."

Bram has written a letter of apology to the science teacher and his homeroom teacher, even posting it on the Internet.

His father, David Koch, said students that age aren't always aware that their conversations on the Internet are public. "These kids are not aware of what they're doing. They don't grasp the concept," he said.

"I don't think he sees himself in the middle of Yonge and Bloor, announcing to the world what's being said," Koch added.

Koch said the school has not done enough to educate students about Internet usage.

"They have not provided any protocol for the Internet, they have not provided any etiquette for the Internet," he said.

But Dunn said the school held a forum about cyber bullying this spring and it even included a play about Facebook.

"The thing about Facebook, of course, is that it becomes public space so it's just like taking out a billboard at Yonge and Steeles, except it's larger than that because everyone in the world gets to look at it," he said.

Koch acknowledged that what Bram wrote was "stupid," but said the school has overstepped its bounds by disciplining his child for an act carried out in his own home.

"He was not on school property, he was not using school equipment, it was not during school time," he said.

"The moment you've entered my house, my living room, you're taking over my role," he charged.

Meantime, Bram is upset about being excluded from the trip. "We've been waiting for it from the beginning of the year.

"Everyone has been psyched about it. Abruptly we've been kicked off," he said, noting the Grade 8 trip is a big deal because it's a social celebration that caps their elementary school years.

He said he'd prefer if the school suspended him rather than banning him from the trip.

"(The trip) is a lot bigger and I don't think they should have done that," he said.

"It's a once-in-a-lifetime trip with your friends," he added.

http://www.thestar.com/article/208693

I think it's fair to observe public profiles of students by school administrators. The students need to understand the real world complications involved with putting their personal life into a public domain, and that as potential job seekers, or college admissions may also anonymously view this information and form an opinion of them without their knowledge.

That's jsut about as bad as having everyone know your password... If you choose to have an online profile -private- then it SHOULD BE PRIVATE. This goes against pretty much every e-morale code, but people can be ignorant about the internet that way. Luckily I do not keep a manifestation of all of my wrong-doings on the internet. They sorta brought it upon themselves in a way, but having someone like that look at their Myspace is basically like having them listen in on every single word you say to some people. Some things are not meant to be discovered, this could cause MAJOR emotional trauma and social problems if, say a person says something insulting about someone and their parents contact the other's parents and so on until everyone knows. When profiles are private, they're meant to be hidden. It's like having a secret, except everyone can learn it.

In essence, your f*cking principal is a hypocrite. He's doing exactly what he wants to prevent.

Lol, every single profile I have is different, to some people I'm 17 (I can act like it if I want) and to you guys I'm 14 which I assure you that I am indeed 14... Google the name reconunit415, add all of my profiles together, find out whats right and whats wrong, and you still do not have a complete profile. Internet anonymity is everything.

I agree with Recon. haha

To all you saying it's perfectly fair and legal. How is it. If profiles are private...

And I haven't done anything illegal or stuff like that, but I do swear and will get in trouble for it. How does that work. It's none of his business.

And YES, my parents DO have a myspace.

Yeah apparently a lot of schools are doing this, and i dont know how it is able to slide by so easily.

Back in middle school, some student forgot to log off his myspace in a classrom, the teacher went on, and viewed all of his friends (other classmates, whose profiles were set to private) he then proceeded to print out the pages with offensive pictures (posing nude, gang signs, alcohol) and contacted the parents of these students and told them what they were doing.

Second story happened last year, where a student made a seperate Facebook account, and went on to make a Facebook group against a particular student. He did this in his own time, from the comfort of his own home. He was called in and threatened with suspension stating "yeah, we scanned the ip address and it pointed back to your house. there is no denying it, we need you to take it down" Facebook, does not give out these type of information just easily, and even more so in 48 hours.

I understand that it is wrong, but for the SCHOOL to step in to this particular area is wrong. Should an IRS officer be able to stop you on the street and ticket you for speeding? It doesnt make speeding right, but it is a different branch of the government and they should have no say in that department.

:blink: That's not right at all. No one has the right to invade your privacy, especially your VP. Schools shouldn't care about anything that happens outside of school.

I agree, but would like to add that the only time they should be involved/concerned is if something spills into the school environment/setting.

Yeah apparently a lot of schools are doing this, and i dont know how it is able to slide by so easily.

Back in middle school, some student forgot to log off his myspace in a classrom, the teacher went on, and viewed all of his friends (other classmates, whose profiles were set to private) he then proceeded to print out the pages with offensive pictures (posing nude, gang signs, alcohol) and contacted the parents of these students and told them what they were doing.

Second story happened last year, where a student made a seperate Facebook account, and went on to make a Facebook group against a particular student. He did this in his own time, from the comfort of his own home. He was called in and threatened with suspension stating "yeah, we scanned the ip address and it pointed back to your house. there is no denying it, we need you to take it down" Facebook, does not give out these type of information just easily, and even more so in 48 hours.

I understand that it is wrong, but for the SCHOOL to step in to this particular area is wrong. Should an IRS officer be able to stop you on the street and ticket you for speeding? It doesnt make speeding right, but it is a different branch of the government and they should have no say in that department.

The one in bold: That makes sense. He was at school and did it. The other one is completely wrong and illegal. IP Scanning. Unless you work for the FBI, that's illegal.

At Ninja: Exactly. Nothings happened yet with it...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!