Recommended Posts

How do I delete the nightly build guys?

If you used the installer: Just run the uninstaller in Add/Remove Programs or Programs and Features. If it's from the ZIP, delete the folder. ;) Then remove your user folder from Local Settings\Application Data\Chromium or AppData\Local\Chromium.

Thanks a lot mate.

Now I am on Vista and update the nightly ever day with whatever is the latest build. Should I download the mini_installer or the zip file? Which one is better to update Chromium every day?

Also... Chomium does not appear in the Add/Remove Programs or Programs and Features.

Also how do I delete all my bookmarks and make sure that the new ones I add to IE don't get added to Chromium?

I'd just take the ZIP file. Last time I checked the mini_installer.exe files in build folders, the most recent build wasn't in there (this may have been fixed already).

By 'deleting all your bookmarks,' do you mean Chromium's? The bookmarks are also stored in the user folder...

Two things;

1. With the zip file, it does not install the browser just extracts it and then you can run it. With the mini_installer, I can install it once but I cannot update it properly with the mini_installer.

2. By bookmarks, I mean, I don't want my Internet Explorer Bookmarks to end up in Chromium!

Two things;

1. With the zip file, it does not install the browser just extracts it and then you can run it. With the mini_installer, I can install it once but I cannot update it properly with the mini_installer.

2. By bookmarks, I mean, I don't want my Internet Explorer Bookmarks to end up in Chromium!

1. If you want, you can constantly uninstall and reinstall Chromium via the mini installers. I choose not to do so as the silent installer Chrome/ium uses doesn't give any 'success' or 'failed' messages when it's done. With the ZIP, just overwrite your Chromium folder each time a new build is out.

(Actually, for the time being I'm back to the official Google Chrome builds.)

2. I believe Chrome/ium doesn't automatically import anything. It'll prompt you first before it does.

1. If you want, you can constantly uninstall and reinstall Chromium via the mini installers. I choose not to do so as the silent installer Chrome/ium uses doesn't give any 'success' or 'failed' messages when it's done. With the ZIP, just overwrite your Chromium folder each time a new build is out.

(Actually, for the time being I'm back to the official Google Chrome builds.)

2. I believe Chrome/ium doesn't automatically import anything. It'll prompt you first before it does.

1. I don't think overwriting the folder gives you any information on whether it was good or not? So manual uninstall and install is better!

2. Yeah. I went through that and I seem to have let it import. Now I don't want the bookmarks anymore. What shall I do?

2. Yeah. I went through that and I seem to have let it import. Now I don't want the bookmarks anymore. What shall I do?

According to this answer, bookmarks are stored in "History."

Now I just realized there's no bookmark manager. WTF. :pinch:

Dirhael of DonationCoder created a tiny program (a single exe) that checks the latest nightly build of Google Chrome giving you the choice of downloading either a zipped version or installer of the latest Chrome browser.

Download link to Chromium nightly updater: http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?lnlr71eu9sl

My blog post on this.

please, please, again, the "security hole" has nothing to do with the webkit engine, it's part of the UI shell, and it's about the design decision of defaulting to automatic start downloads, not about the rendering engine which is NOT responsible of handling file downloads.

Finally :

http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapsho...8/changelog.xml

Don't send queries when URL is like: - starts with http:// or https:// and includes username (e.g. http://[email protected]/) - starts with http:// or https:// and includes query (e.g. http://test.com/?q=x) - starts with https:// and includes path component (e.g. https://test.com/path) so as not to leak user data to the suggest server.

The Chromium project is promising ;)

Yeah they are definitely getting faster. Click-wheel probably isn't on their priority list right now. Trying to make it stable/faster/more secure is.

That is true , although its faster the scrolling is getting a bit iffy. At the first beta, it was smooth but too fast. Now it doesn't seem smooth but slightly slower. Bit choppy almost. That might just be me though :s

Dirhael of DonationCoder created a tiny program (a single exe) that checks the latest nightly build of Google Chrome giving you the choice of downloading either a zipped version or installer of the latest Chrome browser.

Download link to Chromium nightly updater: http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?lnlr71eu9sl

My blog post on this.

It would be nice if that application also had support for the changelogs, and perhaps even a list box to see a changelog history of the past builds.

It would be nice if that application also had support for the changelogs, and perhaps even a list box to see a changelog history of the past builds.

That wouldn't work right now. The changelogs don't always show all of the changes (revisions). I was doing a changelog per build (like the nightly threads on mozillazine) but it was too difficult due to having to look up every single revision between each build. Sometimes the changelog is blank, then look on the website and there are a crap load of changes.

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      212
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!